Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed

Associated Press

Supreme Court on ethics issues: Not broken, no fix needed

Jessica Greskow – April 26, 2023

FILE - Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts arrives before President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol, Feb. 7, 2023, in Washington. Roberts has declined a request from the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify at a hearing on ethical standards at the court, instead providing the panel with a statement of ethics reaffirmed by the court's justices. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)
Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts arrives before President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol, Feb. 7, 2023, in Washington. Roberts has declined a request from the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify at a hearing on ethical standards at the court, instead providing the panel with a statement of ethics reaffirmed by the court’s justices. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)
FILE - The Supreme Court is seen on Friday, April 21, 2023, in Washington. While the court’s six conservatives and three liberals have been deeply divided on some of the most contentious issues of the day including abortion, gun rights and the place of religion in public life, they seem united on this particular principle: on ethics they will set their own rules and police themselves. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
The Supreme Court is seen on Friday, April 21, 2023, in Washington. While the court’s six conservatives and three liberals have been deeply divided on some of the most contentious issues of the day including abortion, gun rights and the place of religion in public life, they seem united on this particular principle: on ethics they will set their own rules and police themselves. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
FILE - Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., speaks with reporters about reproductive rights for U.S. veterans, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, April 19, 2023, in Washington. Durbin, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary, has invited Supreme Court Justice John Roberts to testify next month at a hearing on ethics standards. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., speaks with reporters about reproductive rights for U.S. veterans, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, April 19, 2023, in Washington. Durbin, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary, has invited Supreme Court Justice John Roberts to testify next month at a hearing on ethics standards. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken.

The justices’ response on Tuesday struck some critics and ethics experts as tone deaf at a time of heightened attention on the justices’ travel and private business transactions. That comes against the backdrop of a historic dip in public approval as measured by opinion polls.

Deeply divided on some of the most contentious issues of the day — including abortiongun rights and the place of religion in public life — the court’s six conservatives and three liberals seem united on this particular principle: on ethics they will set their own rules and police themselves.

Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor and legal ethics expert, said everything the justices detailed Tuesday evening about ethics was essentially outlined in Chief Justice John Roberts’ annual year-end report from 2011, more than a decade ago.

“They’re basically saying … What we’ve been doing is just fine. Let’s just re-say it for those of you at the back…That just strikes me as, you know, pretty empty,” Geyh said.

The most recent stories about the questionable ethics practices of justices began earlier this month. First came a ProPublica investigation that revealed that Thomas has for more than two decades accepted luxury trips nearly every year from Republican megadonor Harlan Crow without reporting them on financial disclosure forms. Thomas responded by issuing a statement saying that he was not required to disclose the trips.

A week later, ProPublica revealed in a new story that Crow had purchased three properties belonging to Thomas and his family, a transaction worth more than $100,000 that Thomas never disclosed. Politico reported more recently that when Justice Neil Gorsuch sold property he co-owned shortly after becoming a justice, he disclosed the sale but omitted that the property was purchased by a person whose firm frequently has cases before the high court.

And earlier this year, there were stories about the legal recruiting career of Chief Justice John Roberts’ wife and whether it raised ethical concerns that she was paid large sums for placing lawyers at firms that appear before the court.

The series of revelations has provoked outcry and calls for reform particularly from Democrats. On Wednesday, Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Angus King, the independent from Maine, announced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to create a code of conduct and appoint an official to oversee potential conflicts and public complaints. Next week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Supreme Court ethics reform.

“The time has come for a new public conversation on ways to restore confidence in the Court’s ethical standards. I invite you to join it,” wrote Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., in a letter.

Roberts declined in his own letter made public Tuesday evening. He wrote that testimony by previous holders of his office before Congress is “exceedingly rare, as one might expect in light or separation of powers concerns and the importance of preserving judicial independence.”

To his letter, however, Roberts attached a “Statement on Ethics Principles and Practices” signed by all nine justices describing the ethical rules they follow about travel, gifts and outside income. “This statement aims to provide new clarity to the bar and to the public on how the Justices address certain recurring issues, and also seeks to dispel some common misconceptions,” the statement read.

But ethics experts and other court observers said the statement that followed and ran just over two pages was nothing new, just “the rehashing of things we already knew and found insufficient,” said Gabe Roth of the watchdog group Fix the Court in a statement.

The statement signed by the justices essentially said that they consult a wide variety of sources to address ethical issues, decide for themselves when a conflict requires that they step away from a case and file the same annual financial disclosure reports as other judges.

The justices have previously resisted calls to write a formal code of conduct.

Kathleen Clark, a legal ethics professor at Washington University in St. Louis, said in her view the problem is that the justices “have not been subjected to basic accountability that just about everybody else in the federal government has to comply with.”

What was striking to her about the statement, she said, was “a failure to grapple with the fundamental problem of lack of accountability.” The justices “seem to be utterly clueless about the problem they have … They’re in a bubble apparently. They don’t see what a big problem they have with the lack of accountability,” she said.

Mark Sherman contributed to this report.

Trump allies who stole from border wall donors sentenced to prison

The Hill

Trump allies who stole from border wall donors sentenced to prison

Lauren Sforza – April 26, 2023

Two founders of an online fundraising scheme to help former President Trump build a border wall were sentenced to prison Wednesday for participating in a fraud scheme that stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from donors.

Brain Kolfage and Andrew Badolato were sentenced for their alleged involvement in the scheme, which siphoned the money from hundreds of thousands of people that donated to their “We Build the Wall” campaign. The campaign promised the donors that their funds would go toward the construction of a wall at the border with Mexico, which is part of Trump’s core platform.

The fundraising campaign raised more than $25,000,000 from thousands of donors, with Kolfage promising that “100% of the funds raised … will be used in the execution of our mission and purpose,” according to court documents. The court documents said this was false, alleging that Kolfage alone took more than $350,000 for personal funds.

Kolfage was sentenced to 51 months in prison, and Badolato was sentenced to 36 months in prison, according to a press release from the Southern District of New York U.S. attorney’s office. Kolfage and Badolato both pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, with Kolfage also pleading guilty to tax and wire fraud charges.

“Brian Kolfage and Andrew Badolato abused the trust of donors to We Build the Wall and stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations to line their own pockets,” U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in a statement. “The defendants have now been held accountable for their criminal conduct.”

District Judge Analisa Torres also said at the sentencing that “the fraud perpetrated by Mr. Kolfage and Mr. Badolato went well beyond defrauding individual donors. They hurt us all,” the release stated.

Kolfage was ordered to three years of supervised release and to forfeit $17,872,106, as well as to pay restitution of $2,877,414, in addition to the prison sentence. Badolato was ordered to three years of supervised release and to forfeit $1,414,368 and pay restitution in the same amount.

Trump’s former top political adviser Steve Bannon was also allegedly involved in the scheme, but the case was halted after the former president pardoned him. He will likely stand trial for his alleged involvement in the scheme in November 2023.

The third co-founder, Timothy Shea, will have his sentencing on June 13 after being convicted of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering and obstruction of justice.

These old white dudes need to step aside: Sen. Tommy Tuberville, ex-UC coach, blocked 184 military promotions in abortion fight

Cincinnati.com – The Enquirer

Sen. Tommy Tuberville, ex-UC coach, blocked 184 military promotions in abortion fight

Candy Woodall, Cincinnati Enquirer – April 26, 2023

Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama blocked 184 military promotions Tuesday in the latest chapter of his protest against the Pentagon’s new abortion policy.

The drama unfolded in the Senate as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, moved a request to allow the promotions and Tuberville blocked the action.

“I warned Secretary Austin that if he did this and changed this, I would put a hold on his highest-level nominees. Secretary Austin went through with the policy anyway in February of this year, so I am keeping my word,” Tuberville said on the Senate floor.

He has been blocking military promotions in objection to the Department of Defense providing leave and covering expenses for service members who travel to have abortions. Tuberville claims the policy is a violation of federal law.

Tuberville is a former University of Cincinnati and Auburn head football coach. The first-time candidate’s campaign focused on Tuberville pledging his loyalty to President Trump.

Tuberville was head coach at the University of Cincinnati for four seasons before he resigned in December 2016, a short time after telling a heckling fan to “go to hell” and “get a job.”

Tommy Tuberville is in his second year as a U.S. senator from Alabama.
Tommy Tuberville is in his second year as a U.S. senator from Alabama.

Tuberville vs. DOD:Lloyd Austin warns Senate of ‘ripple effect’ from blocking nominees over abortion policy

Warren and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin say the promotions are critical to military readiness, and Tuberville is blocking pay raises and preventing key leaders from taking their posts.

“One senator is jeopardizing America’s national security,” Warren said on the Senate floor.

The promotion of Shoshana Chatfield to vice admiral and as the U.S. representative to the NATO military committee is especially urgent, Warren said.

“At this critical juncture of Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, we need her leadership in NATO now more than ever,” she said.

Blocking military promotions leaves America more vulnerable, Austin said last month during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

“There are a number of things happening globally that indicate that we could be in a contest on any one given day,” he said. “Not approving the recommendations for promotions actually creates a ripple effect through the force that makes us far less ready than we need to be.”

Candy Woodall is a politics editor for USA TODAY. 

Russian troops digging trenches in Ukraine reportedly infected with anthrax

The Telegraph

Russian troops digging trenches in Ukraine reportedly infected with anthrax

Joe Barnes – April 26, 2023

The Russian unit was probably digging trenches as part of an effort to reinforce their defences in the Zaporizhia region, ahead of the long-awaited Ukrainian counter-offensive - @30brigade/Newsflash
The Russian unit was probably digging trenches as part of an effort to reinforce their defences in the Zaporizhia region, ahead of the long-awaited Ukrainian counter-offensive – @30brigade/Newsflash

Russian troops were reportedly infected with anthrax after unearthing a burial site for cattle while digging defensive trenches in southern Ukraine.

The unit was ordered into immediate quarantine, after doctors diagnosed cases of the deadly disease in at least two soldiers, according to Ivan Fedorov, the exiled Ukrainian mayor of Melitopol.

Two Russian servicemen were admitted to a hospital in Melitopol, which has been under occupation since March last year, before being discharged and sent to an unknown location, Fedorov wrote on the Telegram messaging app.

“The enemy unit is now in quarantine,” he said.

“Two Russian servicemen were first brought to Melitopol hospital, but after the diagnosis was confirmed they were quickly discharged and taken to an unknown destination.”

The Russian unit was probably digging trenches as part of an effort to reinforce their defences in the Zaporizhia region, ahead of the long-awaited Ukrainian counter-offensive.

Anthrax is a bacterial infection that can be spread via infected animal carcasses and food. Symptoms include diarrhoea and vomiting blood.

The disease was endemic across much of the Soviet Union in the 20th century because of intense cattle farming.

More than 10,000 cases of anthrax were registered in humans each year at the beginning of the century, but this has decreased drastically because of improved health standards.

Exposed to radiation

It is not the first time the environment in Ukraine has wreaked havoc with Russian troops since their invasion last February.

When Moscow’s troops captured the areas around the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, units were forced to dig trenches in highly radioactive soil in the exclusion zone.

At the time, Ukraine’s state nuclear agency, Energoatom, said the Russian troops would have been exposed to “significant doses of radiation” as they were not wearing protective clothing.

Officials claimed the soldiers were transported to a hospital in Gomel, Belarus, to be treated for radiation sickness, although this was never confirmed by the Belarusian or Russian authorities.

Fresh Ukrainian troops are ready to smash Putin

The Telegraph

Fresh Ukrainian troops are ready to smash Putin

David Axe – April 26, 2023

Ukrainian tanks - Kateryna Klochko/AP
Ukrainian tanks – Kateryna Klochko/AP

Russia’s winter offensive is grinding to a bloody halt in the ruins of Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region. That assault was Russia’s best chance at spoiling a long-anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive.

Now there are just two things the Russians can do: stockpile ammunition, and wait for the coming attack. The assault could come as soon as the deep mud that’s typical of Ukrainian springtime finally dries up.

Even before a braggadocious young US Air National Guard airman leaked classified intelligence on Ukrainian preparations, it was widely known that Kyiv planned a powerful counteroffensive. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other leaders in Kyiv have spoken openly about the coming attack: perhaps to inspire their countrymen, perhaps to spook the Russians. Perhaps both.

It’s one thing to talk up a risky, complex and potentially costly military offensive. It’s another to actually pull it off. And there are two key issues that could constrain just how successful the Ukrainian attack might be. Kyiv’s military probably has enough troops, tanks and artillery. But shortages of artillery shells and air-defence missiles could leave the attacking brigades exposed, and vulnerable to Russian defenses.

The Kremlin actually began preparing for the coming Ukrainian onslaught shortly after the previous Ukrainian counterattack, which kicked off in southern and northeastern Ukraine late last summer. Exploiting gaps between exhausted Russian regiments, two dozen powerful Ukrainian brigades rolled south toward occupied Kherson and east from the free city of Kharkiv, ultimately liberating thousands of square miles from Russian occupation.

After stabilizing the new front line, the Russians dug in.

“Digging trenches, setting up defenses-in-depth,” was the Pentagon description of Russia’s efforts since. The Russian lines are now defended by minefields, concrete anti-tank obstacles and earthen berms. On the far side, Russian troops await.

Penetrating the fortifications, in one or more places somewhere along the 600-mile front line, will be the Ukrainians’ first task, once they’ve decided conditions are right for an attack. In military parlance, this is called a “breach.” Achieving a breach is one of the most complex and riskiest missions in land warfare.

First, engineers have to clear a path through the mines. Then, they must blow up the concrete obstacles, fill in the trenches and blast or dig through the berms – all while under enemy fire. If they succeed in opening up a breach, tanks and infantry can pour through into the enemy’s undefended rear areas.

Ukraine’s attack last year succeeded in part because Russian forces hadn’t yet prepared extensive fortifications – that made it easier for the Ukrainians to punch through. Russia’s offensive this past winter failed because it never succeeded in fully breaching Ukraine’s own defensive fortifications in and around Bakhmut, Vuhledar and other key eastern towns. Soon we will find out if the Ukrainians can do better.

In many ways Zelensky’s troops are well equipped. Thanks to aid from its allies, Ukraine has plenty of equipment for making a breach, including mine-clearing gear and specialized armoured engineering vehicles. It’s also got hundreds of British-, German- and Polish-made tanks, many of them more advanced than their Russian opponents, and missile- and gun-armed fighting vehicles from France, Germany, Sweden and the United States.

Nato and other allied nations have trained tens of thousands of fresh Ukrainian troops to operate this equipment, and Ukraine has organized them in around 20 new brigades overseen by two new headquarters. Kyiv has managed to keep these untouched heavy brigades in reserve even as fighting in Bakhmut escalated earlier this year, cleverly balancing the need to hold the Russians against maintaining their striking power for a future counteroffensive.

The problem for the Ukrainians is that a breaching assault – and the exploitation of the breach once made – is practically suicide without a lot of artillery fire support and solid air defences. Big guns need to hammer the defending enemy troops and gunners in order to keep their heads down and give the attacking engineers time to work. Surface-to-air missile batteries need to ward off helicopters and warplanes the enemy sends to strike the forces assaulting the breach.

Ukraine is short of ammunition for both. If the Ukrainian attack kicks off with inadequate air defence and insufficient supplies of shells, its chance of success drops. A lot.

The ammo problem has been a long time in the making. When Russia widened its war on Ukraine in February 2022, Kyiv’s military still mostly operated ex-Soviet equipment. The factories which make ex-Soviet pattern missiles and shells are in Russia.

At the same time, the fighting has been more intensive than most observers anticipated. Ukrainian artillery has fired as many as 8,000 shells per day, every day, for more than a year. Over the same span of time, Ukrainian air defences have fired dozens of their best missiles every day. Every Soviet-made shell or missile the Ukrainians fired was a shell or missile they couldn’t readily replace.

The main solution, of course, was for Kyiv to reequip its artillery and air defence batteries with Western-made guns and launchers firing Western-made shells and missiles. While the guns and launchers have been forthcoming, supplies of ammo aren’t keeping up. The documents leaked by that young US airman suggest that Ukraine’s medium- and long-range air defences will run out of missiles in April and May respectively – assuming no changes in supplies.

Last month, Ukrainian defense minister Oleksii Reznikov said Ukrainian forces needed “munitions, munitions and more munitions,” including a million 155-millimeter artillery shells for Nato-pattern guns, in order for the coming counteroffensive to succeed. That’s on top of the 1.5 million 155-millimeter shells the United States alone has already donated, many of which have already been fired.

More ammo is on the way, including an unspecified number of additional shells that the Biden administration pledged on April 19. Two days later, US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin III told reporters the USA and other allies “continue to rush in ground-based air-defense capabilities and munitions to help Ukraine control its sovereign skies.”

But it can take weeks for aid to arrive after it’s announced. And Ukraine can’t wait forever to launch its counteroffensive. Every day of delay is another day the Russians have to dig in deeper and add to their own artillery stockpile.

Zelensky, Reznikov and Ukraine’s front-line commanders face a difficult decision of timing. What’s the earliest date when the mud is dry enough and Kyiv’s forces have just enough ammo to execute a breach? Go too soon, and the assault gets stuck in mud and pummeled by Russian artillery and warplanes. Go too late, and Russian fortifications could be even more daunting than they are now.

What’s clear is that if Westerners want to see Ukraine win and the murderous Putin humbled, we should dig deeper yet into our own stockpiles. The Ukrainians are fighting not just bravely but skilfully: building up a powerful strategic reserve while holding a long front line against heavy attacks has taken guts and generalship. Zelensky and his troops have a genuine opportunity to push the Russians back, if we just get them the munitions they need as soon as we can.

First Republic handed out billions in ultra-low-rate mortgages to the wealthy. It backfired horribly.

Business Insider

First Republic handed out billions in ultra-low-rate mortgages to the wealthy. It backfired horribly.

Matt Turner – April 25, 2023

brownstone stoop
Lucas Jackson/Reuters
  • First Republic is teetering, with the stock down 93% in 2023 and the bank exploring strategic options.
  • The bank won wealthy clients with the offer of jumbo mortgage loans that required no principal payments for a decade.
  • The bank is now reversing course as it fights for survival. 

First Republic is racing to strengthen itself.

The bank said Monday that it will cut as much as 25% of staff, and is pursuing strategic options after revealing that deposits plunged by more than $100 billion in the first three months of the year.

That sent the stock as much as 48% lower on the day, with First Republic now down 93% for the year to date. Gillian Tan and Matthew Monks at Bloomberg subsequently reported that the bank is exploring an asset sale in the range of $50 billion to $100 billion.

First Republic first moved into focus back in the March banking crisis that claimed Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and Silvergate.

Like SVB and Signature, a large percentage of First Republic deposits were not insured by the FDIC, making it especially susceptible to deposit flight. Like SVB, First Republic had seen deposits boom in the low-rate pandemic era. And like SVB, First Republic has been sitting on large unrealized losses, as the value of the bonds it’s marked as being held-to-maturity has dropped as rates have gone up.

But while the FDIC seized SVB and Signature, a group of major banks parked $30 billion in deposits with First Republic, helping to shore it up in a period of where depositors opted to move their money to the biggest banks.

One of the causes of First Republic’s troubles is a strategy to woo rich clients with huge mortgages that offer sweet terms, as detailed in this story from Noah Buhayar, Jennifer Surane, Max Reyes, and Ann Choi at Bloomberg.

In particular, First Republic would offer interest-only mortgages, where the borrower didn’t have to pay back any principal for the first decade of the loan. In 2020 and 2021, it extended close to $20 billion of these loans in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York alone, per Bloomberg’s analysis.

Many of these loans went to ultra wealthy types in finance, tech, and media. For example, one of the most senior executives at Goldman Sachs took out an $11.2 million mortgage with First Republic with no principal payments in the first 10 years and an interest rate below 3%, per Bloomberg.

The quality of these loans isn’t in question, as the borrowers are extremely safe bets.

But the loans are worth a lot less now than when First Republic wrote these deals, with the average mortgage rate on a thirty-year fixed rate loan now at around 6.3%. (Bond prices go down as interest rates go up, and vice versa.)

Wealthy clients can easily move their deposits away from First Republic while keeping their mortgage with the firm, which creates a liquidity challenge.

And these loans are hard to sell to other lenders, given Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are limited to only purchasing mortgages up to just over $1 million. Should they successfully sell, it would also create a hole in First Republic’s balance sheet. The bank would be forced to recognize the current value of these loans, and what are currently unrealized losses could suddenly wipe out the bank’s capital.

First Republic is now backtracking from this strategy, saying it will focus on writing loans that are guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie.

More immediately, the bank is trying to find a way to convince buyers to take on some of its assets, including finding ways to sweeten the deal with equity-like instruments so buyers pay a higher price for the loans, according to Tan and Monks at Bloomberg.

The coming days will show whether First Republic was successful.

first republic stock chart 4-25-23
Markets Insider

What is the healthiest fruit? This one is high in antioxidants and has cognitive and cardiovascular benefits.

USA Today

What is the healthiest fruit? This one is high in antioxidants and has cognitive and cardiovascular benefits.

Clare Mulroy, USA TODAY – April 25, 2023

An apple a day keeps the doctor away, right?

We grew up hearing the cliched expression, but do you know how much fruit you should actually be eating per day? The recommended intake depends on a number of factors, but adults should generally consume 1.5 to 2 cups of fruit daily, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. One cup of fruit could be an apple, a banana, a cup of blueberries, three medium-size plums or seven slices or chunks of mango, for example.

Here’s your guide to the health benefits of fruit, plus tips for including more in your diet.

What is the healthiest fruit?

While all fruits are healthy, registered dietitian nutritionist Danielle Crumble Smith recommends one nutrient-packed fruit in particular – wild blueberries.

Blueberries contain lots of fiber, which keeps you fuller for longer. They also rank among the fruits and vegetables with the highest antioxidant content. Antioxidants prevent or delay cell damage.

“From a cognitive standpoint, there are a lot of benefits in terms of memory, and some studies show cardiovascular benefits or cancer-fighting compounds,” Crumble Smith says. “Overall, [they] decrease inflammation.”

Still, Crumble Smith says eating wild blueberries is not essential to getting the healthy nutrients of fruits. Eating fruit of any kind will yield healthy results, though some fruits have nutrients that serve different purposes.

For example, apples contain pectin, a fiber that acts as a prebiotic that can aid colon function and digestion.

Vitamin C-rich fruits should also be on your radar, including citrus (oranges, grapefruit and lemons, to name a few) and strawberries.

“Vitamin C helps with collagen production, and in our generation, people are concerned about decreasing wrinkles and hair, skin and nail health,” Crumble Smith says. “Vitamin C is actually really crucial for that.”

Is V8 good for you?: What to know before swapping real fruits and veggies for juice

What is the healthiest vegetable?: Check out these great nutrient-dense options

Is the sugar in fruit OK for you?

Some fruit fears come from their sugar content. Does the high amount of sugar mean fruit is bad for you? Absolutely not, says Crumble Smith.

“Fruit has so many vitamins, minerals, fiber, water and other nutrients that our body needs,” she says.

In fact, fruit can combat the afternoon slump when most people reach for another cup of coffee. Because natural sugar is a healthy source of energy, pairing fruit with protein will give you a similar boost you’d get through caffeine.

Crumble Smith does recommend caution for people with diabetes, insulin resistance or blood sugar issues. In that case, be mindful of portion size or try to pair your afternoon raspberries with a protein, like yogurt or cheese.

Fruit smoothies are an easy and accessible way to get your daily fruit content. Crumble Smith recommends making them at home rather than grabbing one from a smoothie bar or a pre-packaged drink from the store. If you’re going for bottled juice, make sure to read the nutritional label and ingredients thoroughly.

“Just because something says 100% fruit … oftentimes that’s not the best choice,” Crumble Smith says. “Because in that case, all the concentrated fruit tends to be really high in sugar and don’t have any protein to help stabilize blood sugar levels.”

Cutting back on ultra-processed foods?: Tips to avoid poor eating habits

How much caffeine is dangerous?: What to know before reaching for another cup

Is the fat in avocados good for you?

Contrary to popular belief, yes, avocados are fruits and yes, their fat content is an important part of a healthy, balanced diet.

“People sometimes fear fat, but healthy fats coming from avocados, nuts, seeds, olives, olive oil, fatty fish, they have so many anti-inflammatory benefits,” Crumble Smith says.

Avocados are rich in potassium, which can help lower blood pressure and cholesterol. They also contain large amounts of fiber, which can keep you feeling satisfied for longer and help with blood sugar regulation, according to Crumble Smith.

“Oftentimes fruits and veggies can be great sources of fat-soluble vitamins A, E and K,” Crumble Smith says. “With fat-soluble vitamins, we need a fat source for our body to be able to actually absorb them. So having an avocado with a salad enhances your body’s absorption of those nutrients.”

How to incorporate fruit into your diet

Other than upping your smoothie and fruit salad intake, an easy way to get yourself to eat more fruit is to experiment at the grocery store. Crumble Smith says she tells her clients to put a fruit they’ve never tried in their basket every week when they go to the store.

“It’s a great way to expose yourself to that which you’ve never tried and potentially find something you love,” Crumble Smith says. “And it’s not overwhelming; you’re not coming home with all of these different things that you’re afraid are going to go bad.”

But if you’re hesitant to try something new, there’s no harm in eating the same ol’ fruit every day. You’ll still get a host of benefits. And once you’re feeling more adventurous, you can try swapping – maybe blueberries in your oatmeal instead of a banana, or snack on an orange instead of an apple.

Surprise Exit Catches Trumpworld By Surprise

The New York Times

Surprise Exit Catches Trumpworld By Surprise

Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman – April 25, 2023

From left: Eric Trump, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Tucker Carlson, Donald Trump Jr. and former President Donald Trump at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, N.J., July 31, 2022. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
From left: Eric Trump, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Tucker Carlson, Donald Trump Jr. and former President Donald Trump at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, N.J., July 31, 2022. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)

The announcement on Monday that Fox News was parting ways with its top-rated prime-time host, Tucker Carlson, stunned people in Donald Trump’s orbit. The former president himself was surprised by the news, according to a person with direct knowledge, and his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., who is a close friend of Carlson’s, described the network’s decision as “mind-blowing.”

“I think it changes things permanently,” Donald Trump Jr. said on “The Charlie Kirk Show,” adding that Carlson was “an actual thought leader in conservatism” and a “once-in-a-generation type talent.”

The casual news observer would be forgiven for thinking that Trump and his family no longer had a relationship with Carlson, given recent disclosures of the Fox host’s scathing private text messages, which emerged as part of the conservative network’s legal battle against Dominion Voting Systems.

In early 2021, as Trump desperately tried to overturn the 2020 election, Carlson texted a confidant that he hated the president “passionately.” He also described Trump as a “demonic force.”

When the texts were released in March, Trump was wounded and called Carlson to talk about them, according to a person familiar with the outreach. But the two men patched it up quickly. Since then, they have talked regularly, exchanged text messages and appeared to have a closer relationship than at any time before, according to two people close to Trump who are familiar with their relationship and who did not want to be identified to discuss their private interactions.

In an interview with Greg Kelly of Newsmax that was recorded shortly after Carlson’s departure became public, Trump offered support for the former anchor. “I’m shocked. I’m surprised,” Trump said. “I think Tucker’s been terrific. He’s been, especially over the last year or so, he’s been terrific to me.”

Carlson did not respond to a request for comment.

Last year, some of Trump’s advisers had worried that Carlson seemed poised to support the potential presidential candidacy of Trump’s top rival, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida. Carlson had given DeSantis plenty of airtime and praised his policies. But over the past six weeks, as Trump and Carlson spoke more often, the Trump team felt increasingly confident that Carlson would not be weighing in for DeSantis, who has been heavily promoted by Rupert Murdoch’s media properties including Fox News.

The Trump team liked their odds even more when they learned that Carlson was disgusted with DeSantis’ decision, in late March, to call President Vladimir Putin of Russia a “war criminal.”

Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, a close ally of both Trump and Carlson, described the Fox News host’s ousting as a shock.

“Tucker is a giant, and the most powerful voice against idiotic wars and an economy that placed plutocrats over workers,” Vance said in a text message. “This is a huge loss for a conservative movement that hopes to be worthy of its own voters. I assume he’ll land on his feet and continue to have a powerful voice. If he doesn’t it will be terrible for the country.”

“The best decision I ever made was leaving Fox. Good for you, @TuckerCarlson. You’re free & uncensored!” Kari Lake, a Republican who lost the governor’s race in Arizona last year, wrote in a tweet. Lake left her job as an anchor at a local Fox channel in 2021.

Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., struck an upbeat tone in a Monday tweet: “Wherever Tucker Carlson goes, America will follow!”

Joe Kent, a Republican who ran unsuccessfully for Congress in Washington state, tweeted, “Standing by for the launch of the Tucker news network, the people demand it!”

One close ally of Trump said he was happy that Carlson would not be able to give rocket fuel to any other candidate on Fox’s airwaves. Yet for some candidates in the Republican primary field, the loss of Carlson could mean a minefield they would have to navigate is now gone from a prominent platform.

For instance, DeSantis’ statement to Carlson weeks ago describing the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a “territorial dispute” set off alarm bells and a wave of criticism among Republicans in Washington and some donors. It represented the beginning of what has been a period of concern about DeSantis’ expected candidacy from some who had seen him as the best option to stop Trump.

A Trump adviser, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the sense in Trump’s world was that any pro-Trump host at Fox News had something of a target on their back after the Dominion lawsuit.

Trump’s longest-serving adviser, Roger Stone, who is also an old friend of Carlson’s, said in an interview that Fox News had “essentially canceled the single most influential conservative commentator in the country, at the same time killing a cash cow for the network.”

He predicted that Carlson would take his “massive audience” wherever he ends up next.

Top Kremlin propagandist tells Tucker Carlson he should run for president and ‘You are always welcome in Russia and Moscow’

Insider

Top Kremlin propagandist tells Tucker Carlson he should run for president and ‘You are always welcome in Russia and Moscow’

Nicholas Carlson – April 24, 2023

ucker Carlson speaks during the Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC) Feszt on August 7, 2021 in Esztergom, Hungary.
Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.Janos Kummer/Getty Images
  • Vladimir Solovyov is a notorious Russian propagandist.
  • He says Tucker Carlson should run for President of the United States.
  • Back when Carlson had a Fox News show he would often parrot Kremlin talking points.

The US Department of State describes Vladimir Solovyov as perhaps “the most energetic Kremlin propagandist around today.”

Solovyov is also, apparently, a Tucker Carlson fan.

On Telegram, Solovyov says that after he learned that Carlson and his long time cable network, Fox News, were parting ways, he sent him an email.

“You have our admiration and support in any endeavor you choose for yourself next, be it running for president of the United States (which you should totally do, by the way) or making an independent media project. We’ll happily offer you a job if you wish to carry on as a presenter and host!”

Soloyvov also welcomed Carlson to visit Russia.

You can read it here:

RT, the Russian state television network focused on a US audience, also appeared to offer Carlson a job today.

Carlson is popular with Russian propagandists because, back when he had a show on Fox News, he would regularly use his air time to share points of view on the war in Ukraine that were eerily similar to Russian talking points.

Last year, he said the war, which was started by Russia when it invaded a neighboring independent country, was “designed to cause regime change in Moscow” and was also “payback for the 2016 election.”

In March 2022, Mother Jones obtained a directive the Kremlin gave to state-friendly media outlets in Russia: “It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson.”

Now that Carlson doesn’t have a show, that directive will be more difficult for the next little while. 

Harry Belafonte, Calypso King Who Worked for African American Rights, Dies at 96

Variety

Harry Belafonte, Calypso King Who Worked for African American Rights, Dies at 96

Chris Morris – April 25, 2023

Singer, actor, producer and activist Harry Belafonte, who spawned a calypso craze in the U.S. with his music and blazed new trails for African American performers, died Tuesday of congestive heart failure at his Manhattan home. He was 96.

An award-winning Broadway performer and a versatile recording and concert star of the ’50s, the lithe, handsome Belafonte became one of the first Black leading men in Hollywood. He later branched into production work on theatrical films and telepics.

More from Variety

As his career stretched into the new millennium, his commitment to social causes never took a back seat to his professional work.

An intimate of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Belafonte was an important voice in the ’60s civil rights movement, and he later embarked on charitable activities on behalf of underdeveloped African nations. He was an outspoken opponent of South Africa’s apartheid policies.

Among the most honored performers of his era, Belafonte won two Grammy Awards (and the Recording Academy’s Lifetime Achievement Award in 2000), a Tony and an Emmy. He also received the Motion Picture Academy’s Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award at the Governors Awards ceremony in 2014.

Harold George Belafonte Jr. was born in New York but was sent to live with his grandmother in Jamaica at age 5, returning to attend high school in New York. But Jamaica’s indigenous calypso and mento would supply crucial material for his early musical repertoire.

After serving in the war, Belafonte gravitated to the New York theatrical scene. An early mentor was the famed Black actor, singer and activist Paul Robeson. He studied acting with Erwin Piscator and attended Broadway shows — on a single ticket he would hand off at intermission — with another struggling young actor, Sidney Poitier. Like Poitier, he performed at Harlem’s American Negro Theater.

Belafonte first made his mark, however, as a nightclub singer. Initially working in a pop and jazz vein, Belafonte began his singing career at New York’s Royal Roost and made his recording debut in 1949 on Roost Records. He soon developed a growing interest in American folk music.

A national tour and dates at New York’s Village Vanguard and Blue Angel followed. A scout for MGM spotted him at the latter venue and, following a screen test, Belafonte secured a role opposite Dorothy Dandridge in “Bright Road” (1953).

The same year, Belafonte made his Rialto debut in the revue “John Murray Anderson’s Almanac,” for which he received the Tony for best performance by a featured actor in a musical.

Ironically, while Belafonte was cast as a lead in Otto Preminger’s 1954 musical “Carmen Jones” — based on Oscar Hammerstein II’s Broadway adaptation of Bizet’s opera “Carmen” — his singing voice was dubbed by opera singer LeVern Hutcherson. Belafonte would soon explode in his own right as a pop singer.

He made his RCA Records debut in 1954 with “Mark Twain and Other Folk Favorites”; he had performed the titular folk song with his guitarist Millard Thomas in his Tony-winning Broadway turn. The 1956 LP “Belafonte,” featuring a similar folk repertoire, spent six weeks at No. 1.

Those collections were a mere warm-up to “Calypso.” The 1956 album sparked a nationwide calypso craze, spent a staggering 31 weeks at No. 1 and remains one of the four longest-running chart-toppers in history. It spawned Belafonte’s signature hit, “Banana Boat Song (Day-O),” which topped the singles chart for five weeks. A parody of that ubiquitous number by Stan Freberg reached No. 25 in 1957. Director Tim Burton employed the tune to bright effect in his 1988 comedy “Beetlejuice.”

Belafonte would cut five more top-five albums — including two live sets recorded at Carnegie Hall — through 1961. His 1960 collection “Swing Dat Hammer” received a Grammy as best ethnic or traditional folk album; he scored the same award for 1965’s “An Evening With Belafonte/Makeba,” a collaboration with South African folk artist Miriam Makeba.

He also supplied early employment for a future folk icon: His 1962 album “Midnight Special” featured harmonica work by Bob Dylan.

A frequent guest on TV variety shows, Belafonte became the first Black performer to garner an Emmy with his 1959 special “Tonight With Belafonte.”

Belafonte made his first steps into film production with two features he toplined: end-of-the-world drama “The World, the Flesh, and the Devil” (1959) and the heist picture “Odds Against Tomorrow” (1960). However, discontent with the roles he was being offered, he would remain absent from the big screen for the remainder of the ’60s and busied himself with recording and international touring as his involvement in the civil rights movement deepened.

Closely associated with clergyman-activist King, Belafonte provided financial support to the civil rights leader and his family. He also funded the Freedom Riders and the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee and was a key figure in the organization of the historic March on Washington of August 1963.

The racial tumult of the ’60s hit close to home: In 1968 he became the center of a furor when he appeared as a guest star on an NBC special hosted by British pop singer Petula Clark. During a performance of an anti-war ballad, Clark clutched Belafonte’s arm. Doyle Lott, VP for sponsor Chrysler-Plymouth, was present at the taping and demanded the number be excised, saying the “interracial touching” might offend Southern viewers. But Clark, who owned the show, put her foot down and the show aired as recorded, while exec Lott was fired by the automaker.

Belafonte returned to feature films in 1970 in the whimsical “The Angel Levine” alongside Zero Mostel. He co-starred with old friend Poitier in the comedies “Buck and the Preacher” (1972) and “Uptown Saturday Night” (1974), both directed by Poitier.

His acting appearances would be sporadic for the remainder of his career. Notably, he appeared opposite John Travolta in “White Man’s Burden” (1995), an alternate-universe fantasy-drama about racism; Robert Altman’s ensemble period drama “Kansas City” (1996); and “Bobby” (2006), Emilio Estevez’s account of Sen. Robert Kennedy’s 1968 assassination.

In 1985, Belafonte’s activism and musicianship intertwined when he helped organize the recording session for “We Are the World,” the all-star benefit single devoted to alleviating African famine. His appearance on that huge hit led to “Paradise in Gazankulu” (1988), his first studio recording in more than 10 years.

His latter-day production work included the 1984 hip-hop drama “Beat Street” and the 2000 miniseries “Parting the Waters,” based on historian Taylor Branch’s biography of Martin Luther King Jr.

In 2002, “The Long Road to Freedom: An Anthology of Black Music,” an immense collection of African and African-American music recorded and compiled by Belafonte over the course of a decade and originally set for release by RCA in the ’70s, was finally released as a five-CD set on Universal’s Buddha imprint. It garnered three Grammy nominations.

In later years, Belafonte remained as outspoken as ever, and his views sometimes courted controversy. He was a foe of South African apartheid, opposed the U.S.’s Cuban embargo and denounced George W. Bush’s military incursion into Iraq.

Belafonte was the son of a Jamaican housekeeper and a Martiniquan chef, spending the early and late parts of his childhood in Harlem but the crucial middle period in Jamaica. He enlisted in the Navy in 1944; during his service, he encountered the writing of W.E.B. DuBois, co-founder of the NAACP and a key influence.

He was accorded the Kennedy Center Honor in 1989 and the National Medal of the Arts in 1994.

Belafonte published his memoir “My Song,” written with Michael Shnayerson, in 2011. Susanne Rostock’s biographical documentary “Sing Your Song” was released in early 2012.

He is survived by his third wife Pamela; daughters Shari, Adrienne and Gina; son David; stepchildren Sarah and Lindsey; and eight grandchildren.