Woman With Dementia at 59 Shares the Symptoms Her Doctors Dismissed as Stress

Best Life

Woman With Dementia at 59 Shares the Symptoms Her Doctors Dismissed as Stress

Zachary Mack – December 15, 2022

The first signs of age-related illness such as cognitive decline can be challenging to spot, unlike cardiovascular disease or other primarily physical ailments such as diabetes. But the problem can be particularly challenging to identify when it starts progressing at a younger age, especially as it can often get mistaken for other issues. Unfortunately, such was the case for one 59-year-old woman in the U.K. who was recently diagnosed with dementia after doctors first dismissed her symptoms as stress. Read on to see how she first noticed the condition and what she’s doing about it now.

READ THIS NEXT: These 5 Popular Medications Have Been Linked With Alzheimer’s, Research Shows.

A woman diagnosed with dementia in her 50s says doctors first dismissed her symptoms as stress.

The pressures of everyday life can sometimes take a toll on our mental clarity and well-being. But for Jude Thorp, a 59-year-old mother of two living in Oxford, England, it became clear that something was seriously wrong when she first started noticing a change in her abilities while on the job, The Independent reports.

After years of experience in a career in theater, Thorp realized she had more difficulty completing simple tasks or focusing on her work. She soon noticed she was also repeating questions, forgetting important conversations, feeling fatigued, and having difficulty coming up with the right words during conversations.

Despite the changes, Thorp didn’t seek medical attention until her wife convinced her to book an appointment with a specialist in November 2016. But upon examination, she said her doctors quickly wrote her symptoms off as the result of stress and said “she had too much going on” in her life.

“Imagine, you know, just being told that you’re a bit daft,” she told The Independent, describing it as a “humiliating” experience. “That was my first time going to the doctors for something serious in my life, and it was horrendous, and afterward they said there’s nothing wrong with me.”

Thorp was eventually diagnosed with young-onset dementia.

Despite her first experiences, Thorp says she continued to visit different specialists over the following years. But it wasn’t until doctors performed a lumbar puncture and she underwent an MRI scan that she finally received a diagnosis of early-onset dementia caused by Alzheimer’s disease in January 2021, The Independent reports.

According to the Mayo Clinic, young-onset dementia is the term used to describe anyone under the age of 65 who begins showing signs of the condition. In the case of Alzheimer’s, the health organization says that five to six percent of people with the disease develop it in middle age—meaning that there could be anywhere between 300,000 to 360,000 people in the U.S. living with the condition.

Doctors say early-onset dementia has multiple causes but can be difficult to spot or diagnose.

Early-onset dementia can be caused by a number of conditions, including frontotemporal dementia (FTD), vascular dementia, or Lewy body dementia, according to the Alzheimer’s Society. However, the foundation says atypical Alzheimer’s disease is the most likely cause for anyone who begins experiencing their first symptoms between the ages of 30 and 60.

Different forms of the condition can manifest with varying sets of signs. They include posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), which can make it difficult to interpret visual information such as reading a sentence or gauging distances; logopenic aphasia, which can make it hard to find the right words while speaking or taking long pauses mid-sentence; and dysexecutive Alzheimer’s disease that can make planning more difficult and lead to inappropriate behavior in social situations, according to the Alzheimer’s Society.

Unfortunately, it can be difficult to identify these problems as early-onset dementia in middle-aged people. “Complaints about brain fog in young patients are very common and are mostly benign,” David S. Knopman, MD, a neurologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, told The New York Times in an interview. “It’s hard to know when they’re not attributable to stress, depression, or anxiety or the result of normal aging. Even neurologists infrequently see patients with young-onset dementia.”

Getting the correct diagnosis can help you treat and manage early-onset dementia.
At doctors appointment physician shows to patient shape of brain with focus on hand with organ. Scene explaining patient causes and localization of diseases of brain, nerves and nervous system
At doctors appointment physician shows to patient shape of brain with focus on hand with organ. Scene explaining patient causes and localization of diseases of brain, nerves and nervous system

Despite the challenges in identifying it, correctly diagnosing early-onset dementia can be absolutely vital. Besides being able to rule out any other treatable causes for the symptoms, knowing what they’re facing can help someone get the appropriate care and planning started so they can focus on improving their quality of life, according to the Mayo Clinic.

For Thorp, the diagnosis first felt like a heavy burden—especially when she had to break the news to her two young daughters. But she said the process ultimately brought her to a better place. “You have to mourn, you have to be cross or angry or upset. I mean, that’s part of grieving for something, isn’t it? But for me, I’m so lucky that I’ve got this diagnosis because I can still live well with it,” she told The Independent.

Since identifying her dementia, Thorp has been put in touch with support groups and found new fulfillment in charity work and outreach about the disease. “I think accepting a diagnosis of anything allows you to blossom in a way. And I think it’s really important that life can be rich,” she said. “I think it’s about living your best life and doing what you can.”

DeSantis blasted for ‘Orwellian’ vaccine investigation

Yahoo! News

DeSantis blasted for ‘Orwellian’ vaccine investigation

Alexander Nazaryan, Senior W. H. Correspondent – December 15, 2022

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaking at a news conference in Miami.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis at a news conference in Miami on Dec. 1. (Ronen Tivony/SOPA Images via ZUMA Press Wire)

One day after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced a push to investigate alleged harms caused by coronavirus vaccines, Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical adviser, criticized the move as a pointless exercise that would only undermine public confidence in efforts to boost and maintain protection against the circulating pathogen.

“We have a vaccine that, unequivocally, is highly effective and safe and has saved literally millions of lives,” Fauci said Wednesday on CNN. “What’s the problem with vaccines?”

The problem is vaccines have become part of America’s polarized politics. Since the advent of COVID-19 vaccines late in the Trump administration, skepticism of the established medical science has become a kind of creed for many conservatives, as well as for some on the far left. Political disagreements about lockdowns, mask mandates and vaccine requirements have hardened into antipathy toward the vaccines themselves.

Seizing on rare adverse side effects and diminishing effectiveness — the result of new variants and low booster uptake — vaccine critics have dismissed inoculation as ineffective and potentially dangerous.

Some have also embraced outlandish conspiracy theories about vaccines as a form of government and corporate control.

An anti-vaccination activist at a rally holds a sign that reads: No mandates. My body, my choice.
Anti-vaccination activists at a rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., in January. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

During a pandemic-related hearing in the House, Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland progressive, called the proposed grand jury an “Orwellian” development. “These actions are transparently designed to falsely suggest that coronavirus vaccines, and not the coronavirus itself, are dangerous,” he said Wednesday.

DeSantis, who is widely expected to seek the Republican presidential nomination in 2024, played open to those concerns on Tuesday, when he announced he would call for Florida’s Supreme Court to empanel a grand jury “to investigate crimes and wrongdoing committed against Floridians related to the COVID-19 vaccine.” He is also seeking “further surveillance into sudden deaths of individuals that received the COVID-19 vaccine in Florida.”

Such deaths are rare, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, whose vaccine surveillance statistics indicate that 17,868 people — or 0.0027% of vaccine recipients — died after their shots. Those reports unquestionably include thousands of deaths that happened after vaccination but had nothing to do with the vaccines themselves.

Vaccine skeptics have often used reports of supposed side effects — such as those to a vaccine database that does not require confirmation — to exaggerate supposed dangers. And such critics invariably downplay the fact that vaccines are exceptionally effective at stopping serious and critical COVID-19 illness, which has killed more than 6.6 million people globally.

A health care worker administers an injection to someone sitting in a car.
A health care worker administers a COVID-19 vaccine at a drive-through site in Miami in December of last year. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

And with online misinformation and partisan politics exercising strong pressures on the American public, vaccine fears have been easily exploited, leading to low uptake among Republicans. As a consequence, heavily Republican areas have had higher death rates than Democratic ones.

In Florida, more than 83,000 people have died from COVID-19, and cases there have been rising recently. DeSantis, who has decried what he describes as “Faucism” (the echoes of “fascism” are difficult to miss), downplayed the seriousness of the pandemic from the start, though he has also been credited for opening schools and other businesses well before Democratic counterparts, some of whom remained in a cautious crouch well into 2021.

Earlier this year, DeSantis clashed with former President Donald Trump for supporting vaccination, refusing to say whether he had received a booster shot. Trump shot back by calling DeSantis “gutless.”

DeSantis has also regularly attacked Fauci in personal terms. “Someone needs to grab that little elf and chuck him across the Potomac,” he said earlier this year of Fauci, who has been the face of the pandemic for both the Trump and Biden administrations. (He was eventually sidelined by the former in favor of experts closer in line with DeSantis’s views.)

In late 2021, DeSantis hired Dr. Joseph Ladapo as Florida’s surgeon general. Ladapo has had no experience with infectious diseases and has routinely attacked vaccination and masking. “With these new actions, we will shed light on the forces that have obscured truthful communication about the COVID-19 vaccines,” Ladapo said after Tuesday’s event.

Florida’s surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo speaking from a podium as Gov. Ron DeSantis looks on.
Florida’s surgeon general, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, with DeSantis looking on, in Brandon, Fla., in November 2021. (Chris O’Meara/AP)

The announcement by DeSantis comes days after new Twitter owner Elon Musk attacked Fauci on Twitter, calling for his prosecution. A supporter of DeSantis, Musk has argued that prior to his ownership, Twitter executives suppressed information on the coronavirus that presumably undermined public health messaging.

Last week, he invited Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya — an outspoken critic of pandemic precautions — to Twitter’s headquarters. Bhattacharya, who has advised DeSantis in the past, will be on the governor’s new public safety committee, along with Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard (a co-author, with Bhattacharya, of the pro-reopening Great Barrington Declaration) and Bret Weinstein, a quasi-celebrity on the so-called Intellectual Dark Web with no professional experience in vaccinology.

“I’m not sure what they’re trying to do down there,” Fauci said in the Wednesday CNN interview. Though he is about to retire after four decades of federal service, he is likely to face calls to testify from House Republicans, who continue to accuse him of making misleading statements on masks, vaccines and the origins of the coronavirus.

As his retirement has approached, Fauci has been increasingly vocal and defiant about the challenges revealed by the nation’s faltering coronavirus response, which has left more than a million people dead in the U.S.

In a New York Times essay, Fauci lamented the role that “disinformation and political ideology” have played in sowing doubt about masks, vaccines and other measures.

The silhouette of Dr. Anthony Fauci against a blue background.
Dr. Anthony Fauci on Dec. 9 during a virtual event to urge Americans to get vaccinated ahead of the holiday season. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

Rep. Adam Kinzinger in final House floor speech says ‘limited government’ for GOP now means ‘inciting violence against government officials’

Business Insider

Rep. Adam Kinzinger in final House floor speech says ‘limited government’ for GOP now means ‘inciting violence against government officials’

Bryan Metzger – December 15, 2022

Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois at a January 6 committee meeting on December 1, 2021.
Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois at a January 6 committee meeting on December 1, 2021.Stefani Reynolds for The Washington Post via Getty Images
  • GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger spoke on the House floor for the last time, having declined re-election.
  • He condemned his own party on Thursday, saying it has “embraced lies and deceit.”
  • He also criticized Democrats for boosting election-denying candidates in GOP primaries this year.

Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois spoke on the House floor for the final time on Thursday after declining to seek re-election.

Kinzinger, a member of the January 6 committee and one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump for incitement of insurrection following the Capitol riot, has emerged as a key critic of the GOP from within the party.

In his farewell speech, Kinzinger declared that “our democracy is not functioning” and said Republicans have “embraced lies and deceit.” Despite not mentioning Trump by name, he made numerous references to the assault on the Capitol.

“Republicans once believed that limited government meant lower taxes and more autonomy,” he said. “Today, limited government means inciting violence against government officials.”

He also criticized the leadership of the Republican National Committee, which used the phrase “legitimate political discourse” as it moved to censure him and Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming for their participation in the January 6 committee.

“Our leaders today belittle, and in some cases justify attacks on the US Capitol as ‘legitimate political discourse,'” Kinzinger added. “We shelter the ignorant, the racist, who only stoke anger and hatred to those who are different than us.”

Kinzinger also criticized Democrats for helping to boost election-denying candidates in Republican primaries this year in order to produce weaker general-election nominees, a controversial tactic that some top Democrats publicly defended.

“To my Democratic colleagues, you must too bear the burden of our failures. Many of you have asked me: where are all the good Republicans? ” he said. “Over the past two years, Democratic leadership had the opportunity to stand above the fray.”

“Instead, they poured millions of dollars into the campaigns of MAGA Republicans, the same candidates Biden called a national security threat, to ensure these good Republicans did not make it out of their respective primaries,” Kinzinger continued. “This is no longer politics as usual. This is not a game.”

Zelenskyy: Occupiers destroy every town and village in Donbas so there are no buildings for defense

Ukrayinska Pravda

Zelenskyy: Occupiers destroy every town and village in Donbas so there are no buildings for defense

Ukrainska Pravda – December 15, 2022

Atrocious Russian attacks continue in Donbas, the occupiers are physically destroying towns and villages in order for Ukrainian soldiers not to have buildings that can be used for defence.

Source: President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in his evening address

Quote: “Today in Donbas, as in all previous weeks, brutal Russian attacks continue. The occupiers throw everyone and everything they have into the offensive.

They cannot defeat our army, so they physically destroy every town and village so that there are no buildings, not even walls, that can be used for any kind of defence…”

Details: According to Zelenskyy, the only way to stop this is pushing Russian terrorist out of Ukrainian land step by step and “continuing the pressure on Russia, finding new ways to hold every Russian terrorist, every Russian oligarch who helps the terrorist state and all Russian officials and propagandists accountable for everything they are doing against Ukraine and against freedom as such.”

Dictionary.com announces word of the year: ‘woman’

The Guardian

Dictionary.com announces word of the year: ‘woman’

Erum Salam – December 14, 2022

<span>Photograph: Nathan Posner/Rex/Shutterstock</span>
Photograph: Nathan Posner/Rex/Shutterstock

The website Dictionary.com has named its word of the year for 2022: woman.

In a statement, the website said: “Our selection of woman … reflects how the intersection of gender, identity and language dominates the current cultural conversation and shapes much of our work as a dictionary.”

Related: Biden signs landmark law protecting same-sex and interracial marriages

It also said: “Searches for the word woman on Dictionary.com spiked significantly multiple times in relation to separate high-profile events, including the moment when a question about the very definition of the word was posed on the national stage.”

That was a reference to a supreme court confirmation hearing in March, when the nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson, was asked by Marsha Blackburn, a Republican senator from Tennessee, to define the word woman.

Jackson said: “No I can’t.”

Soon after, Jackson became the first Black woman confirmed to the court.

Searches for woman increased by 1,400% after the hearing, Dictionary.com said, the highest spike for the word this year.

According to Dictionary.com, the definition of woman is “an adult female person”.

Other key moments that led to the word being chosen included the supreme court voting to overturn Roe v Wade and thereby revoke the constitutional right to abortion; the death of Queen Elizabeth II; tennis player Serena William’s retirement announcement; freedom protests led by women in Iran; and more.

Referring to the supreme court abortion decision, Dictionary.com said: “Unsurprisingly, it resulted in both polarization and galvanization. That dynamic played out in November’s midterm elections, which upended trends and expectations.

“The outcome has been attributed in part to an electorate, and particularly women, voting in reaction to the Dobbs ruling. The election also added to the ranks of the nation’s women governors, resulting in what will be a record number of women – 12 – serving as governors in 2023.”

Dictionary.com’s senior director of editorial, John Kelly, said that to qualify as word of the year, a word must see “a significant increase in searches” and “capture the major cultural themes and trends in language” for the 12 months in question.

In 2022, shortlisted words included inflation, quiet quitting, democracy, the Ukraine flag emoji and Wordle – the last a popular word game bought by the New York Times.

In 2021, Dictionary.com named allyship as its word of the year. Previous words of the year were pandemic (2020), existential (2019), misinformation (2018), complicit (2017), xenophobia (2016), identity (2015), exposure (2014), privacy (2013), bluster (2012), tergiversate (2011), and change (2010).

Are We in the West Weaker Than Ukrainians?

Nicholas Kristof – December 14, 2022

Three women in military fatigues try on boots in a room with gray walls and a stack of black shoe boxes in the corner.
Credit…Emile Ducke for The New York Times

“We will beat the Ukrainian out of you so that you love Russia,” a Russian interrogator told one torture survivor I spoke to in Ukraine, before he whipped her and raped her. That seems a pretty good summation of Vladimir Putin’s strategy.

It isn’t working in Ukraine, where Putin’s atrocities seem to be bolstering the will to fight back. That brave woman triumphed over her interrogators, albeit at horrific personal cost.

But I worry that we in the West are made of weaker stuff. Some of the most momentous decisions the United States will make in the coming months involve the level of support we will provide Ukraine, and I’ve had pushback from some readers who think President Biden is making a terrible mistake by resolutely helping Ukraine repel Russia.

A woman named Nancy protested on my Facebook page that I was more interested in securing Ukraine’s border than the American border. She argued that we should focus on our own challenges rather than Ukraine’s.

“We’re over our head in debt but funding a war that we shouldn’t be involved in,” she said. “Enough is enough.”

Polls find American support for aid to Ukraine still robust but slipping, especially among Republicans. And almost half of Americans want the United States to push Ukraine “to settle for peace as soon as possible,” even if it loses territory — a finding that must gladden Vladimir Putin’s heart.

The exhaustion with Western support for Ukraine may continue to gain ground in the coming months as people grow weary of high energy prices and, in the case of some European countries, possible rolling power cuts.

So let me make the case, to Nancy and others, for why we should continue to provide weaponry to Ukraine.

The fundamental misconception among many congressional Republicans (and some progressives on the left) is that we’re doing Ukraine a favor by sending it weapons. Not so. We are holding Ukraine’s coat as it is sacrificing lives and infrastructure in ways that benefit us, by degrading Russia’s military threat to NATO and Western Europe — and thus to us.

“They’re doing us a favor; they’re fighting our fight,” Wesley Clark, the retired American general and former supreme allied commander of NATO forces in Europe, told me. “The fight in Ukraine is a fight about the future of the international community.”

If the war ends in a way favorable to Russia, he argues, it will be a world less safe for Americans. One lesson the world would absorb would be the paramount importance of possessing nuclear weapons, for Ukraine was invaded after it gave up its nuclear arsenal in the 1990s — and Russia’s nuclear warheads today prevent a stronger Western military response.

“If Ukraine falls, there will certainly be a wave of nuclear proliferation,” Clark warned.

For years, military strategists have feared a Russian incursion into Estonia that would challenge NATO and cost lives of American troops. Ukrainians are weakening Russia’s forces so as to reduce that risk.

More broadly, perhaps the single greatest threat to world peace in the coming decade is the risk of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait that escalates into a war between America and China. To reduce that danger, we should help Taiwan build up its deterrent capacity — but perhaps the simplest way to reduce the likelihood of Xi Jinping acting aggressively is to stand united against Russia’s invasion. If the West falters and allows Putin to win in Ukraine, Xi will feel greater confidence that he can win in Taiwan.

Putin has been a destabilizing and brutal bully for many years — from Chechnya to Syria, Georgia to Moldova — partly because the world has been unwilling to stand up to him and partly because he possesses a powerful military force that Ukraine is now dismantling. Aside from energy, Russia’s economy is not substantial.

“Putin and Russia are weak,” Viktor Yushchenko, a former Ukrainian president who challenged Russia and then was mysteriously poisoned and disfigured, told me. “Russia is a poor country, an oil appendage to the world, a gas station.”

The world owes Ukraine for its willingness to finally stand up to Putin. If anything, I’d like to see the Biden administration carefully ratchet up the capabilities of the weaponry it supplies Ukraine, for it may be that the best way to end the war is simply to ensure that Putin finds the cost of it no longer worth paying.

I don’t mean to suggest that everyone backing peace negotiations is craven, fatigued or myopic. Gen. Mark Milley and other Pentagon officials are understandably worried that the Ukraine conflict could spiral out of control into a nuclear war. That’s a legitimate concern, and it’s always good to peer through the fog of war for off-ramps. But bowing to nuclear blackmail and rewarding an invasion would create their own risks for many years to come, and on balance those dangers seem greater than those of maintaining the present course.

In arguing for the West to stand with Ukraine, I’ve emphasized our national interest in doing so. But we have values at stake as well as interests, for there is also a moral question to face.

When one nation invades a neighbor and commits murder, pillage and rape, when it traffics in thousands of children, when it pulverizes the electrical grid to make civilians freeze in winter — in such a blizzard of likely war crimes, neutrality is not the high ground.

Let’s not let Russia beat the Ukrainian out of us: The world could use a spinal transplant from brave Ukrainians.

Nicholas Kristof joined The New York Times in 1984 and has been a columnist since 2001. He has won two Pulitzer Prizes, for his coverage of China and of the genocide in Darfur. 

Drought emergency declared for all Southern California

Los Angeles Times

Drought emergency declared for all Southern California

Hayley Smith, Ian James – December 14, 2022

A woman waters her garden in Los Angeles on August 18, 2022. - Residents and businesses in Los Angeles County, and surrounding San Bernardino and Ventura Counties, have had to limit outdoor water usage since June 1 to one or two days a week due to ongoing drought water restrictions. (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP) (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)
A woman waters her garden in Los Angeles in August. (Frederic J. Brown / AFP via Getty Images)

As California faces the prospect of a fourth consecutive dry year, officials with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California have declared a regional drought emergency and called on water agencies to immediately reduce their use of all imported supplies.

The decision from the MWD’s board came about eight months after officials declared a similar emergency for 7 million people who are dependent on supplies from the State Water Project, a vast network of reservoirs, canals and dams that convey water from Northern California. Residents reliant on California’s other major supply — the Colorado River — had not been included in that emergency declaration.

“Conditions on the Colorado River are growing increasingly dire,” MWD Chairwoman Gloria Gray said in a statement. “We simply cannot continue turning to that source to make up the difference in our limited state supplies. In addition, three years of California drought are drawing down our local storage.”

Officials said the call for conservation in Colorado River-dependent areas could become mandatory if drought conditions persist in the coming months, which some experts say is likely. By April, the MWD will consider allocating supplies to all of its 26 member agencies, requiring them to either cut their use of imported water or face steep additional fees. The agencies together serve about 19 million people.

“Since this drought began, we have been steadily increasing our call for conservation. If we don’t have an extremely wet winter, we will need to elevate to our highest level — a water supply allocation for all of Southern California,” said MWD General Manager Adel Hagekhalil. “Substantial and immediate conservation now and in the coming months will help lessen the potential severity of such an allocation.”

MWD member agencies, which include the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the Municipal Water District of Orange County and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, will implement voluntary and mandatory conservation measures at the local level based on their particular circumstances, officials said. Those with local supplies or other alternative options may be able to rely on them in the interim.

The DWP, which imports state and federal water as well as water from the Owens Valley via the Los Angeles Aqueduct, has been under Level 3 of its water shortage contingency plan since June, including two-day-a-week outdoor watering limitations.

During a board meeting Tuesday, DWP senior assistant general manager Anselmo Collins said MWD’s decision was “setting the stage” for the entire region to see similar rules should the Colorado order become mandatory.

“We already have a budget that’s been given to us, so to us [in Los Angeles] it’s probably not going to be any different,” he told the board. “It is going to be for the other 20 member agencies that are currently not under a water supply allocation. … They would too be put on some kind of volumetric budget, or one-day-a-week requirement.”

About half of the MWD’s imported water comes from the State Water Project and half from the Colorado River — both of which have become “extraordinarily stressed by prolonged drought exacerbated by climate change,” the agency said.

The Colorado River has fallen to such historic lows that Lake Mead and Lake Powell — the nation’s two largest reservoirs — could reach “dead pool”, or the point at which water no longer passes downstream from a dam. California and six other states that rely on the river have been under pressure from the federal government to drastically reduce their use.

In October, some California water agencies, including the MWD, pledged usage reductions of up to 400,000 acre-feet per year, or about 9% of the state’s total 4.4 million water allotment from the river, through 2026. Still, other states are demanding that California do more to cut usage.

The drought emergency declaration came as representatives of the MWD and other water districts gathered in Las Vegas with officials from all seven states, the federal government and tribes for the annual conference of the Colorado River Water Users Assn. Attendees are discussing various issues about how the river is managed, including measures to address the severe shortage.

“It’s a good step for sure,” conference attendee Daryl Vigil, water administrator of the Jicarilla Apache Nation in New Mexico, said of the MWD’s declaration.

The willingness of the district’s officials to “take part in mitigating the risk in terms of reduction in use is really big coming from California,” Vigil said. “And hopefully others will follow suit.”

Scott Houston, vice president of the West Basin Municipal Water District, a wholesale supplier for nearly 1 million people in 17 cities and unincorporated areas in Los Angeles County, said the move is necessary.

“We are in a critical time with the Colorado River,” Houston said. “This is a very serious situation, as we’ve seen the conditions escalate over the last few months. This is an all-hands-on-deck moment.”

The State Water Project has been under similar strain. The driest three water years on record in California resulted in record-low deliveries to Southern California, and earlier this month, state officials said they may allocate only 5% of requested supplies next year if drought conditions do not significantly improve.

Madelyn Glickfeld, co-director of the UCLA Water Resources Group, said the MWD’s decision was a “warning shot” for what could lie ahead — and a reminder of how important it is for communities to invest in alternative supplies such as recycled water and, in some cases, groundwater and desalination.

“We’ve been working hard toward this, but I don’t think anyone expected — or they didn’t look carefully enough — to expect that this was going to happen right now,” she said. “There were a lot of places where people could have taken the warning before now, but they have not.”

The MWD underscored that it has been making big investments in sustainable local supplies for the region, including the development of what could be one of the world’s largest recycled water facilities, Pure Water Southern California.

But many such projects are years if not decades away, and action is critical now, Glickfeld said. For the time being, conservation and “a complete transition in the way we do landscaping” are among the region’s best bets.

Indeed, many agencies, including the DWP and the West Basin Municipal District, have been offering rebates for residents to replace their grass with drought-resilient landscaping.

“One of the biggest areas where we use water is outdoor irrigation,” Houston said. “That’s really one of the best tools in our toolbox right now to reduce the need for some of that imported water.”

As officials continue to weigh their options for the Colorado River, the mandatory measures in State Water Project-dependent areas will continue through at least June and possibly longer, the MWD said.

“Some Southern Californians may have felt somewhat protected from these extreme conditions over the past few years,” Gray said. “They shouldn’t anymore. We are all affected.”

Nation’s largest water supplier declares drought emergency

Associated Press

Nation’s largest water supplier declares drought emergency

December 14, 2022

FILE – A sprinkler waters the lawn of a home on Wednesday, May 18, 2016, in Santa Ana, Calif. T On Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2022, the Metropolitan Water District declared a regional drought emergency for all of Southern California. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The nation’s largest water supplier has declared a drought emergency for all of Southern California, clearing the way for potential mandatory water restrictions early next year that could impact 19 million people.

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California provides water to 26 different agencies that supply major population centers like Los Angeles and San Diego counties.

It doesn’t rain much in Southern California, so the district imports about half of its water from the Colorado River and the northern Sierra Nevada via the State Water Project — a complex system of dams, canals and reservoirs that provides drinking water for much of the state.

It’s been so dry the past three years that those water deliveries have hit record lows. Earlier this year, the district declared a drought emergency for the agencies that mostly depend on the State Water Project, which covers about 7 million people.

On Tuesday, the board voted to extended that declaration to cover all Southern California water agencies. They called on agencies to immediately reduce how much water they import. By April, the board will decide whether to make those cuts mandatory if the drought continues.

“Some Southern Californians may have felt somewhat protected from these extreme conditions over the past few years. They shouldn’t anymore. We are all affected,” said Gloria D. Gray, chair of the Metropolitan Water District’s Board.

State officials recently announced that water agencies like Metropolitan will only get 5% of their requested supplies for the start of 2023 due to lower reservoir levels. Some agencies may get a little bit more if its necessary for drinking, sanitation or other health and safety concerns.

The drought declaration comes as Colorado River water managers are meeting in Las Vegas to discuss growing concerns about the river’s future after more than two decades of drought. Scientists say climate change has contributed to sustained warmer and drier weather in the West, threatening water supplies. The river’s two largest reservoirs — Lake Mead on the Nevada-Arizona state line and Lake Powell on the Arizona-Utah border — are each about one-quarter full.

In California, despite a recent run of storms that have dumped heavy rain and snow in the Sierra Nevada and Central Valley, reservoirs are all well below average for this time of year.

“I think Metropolitan is being very proactive in doing this,” said Dave Eggerton, executive director of the Association of California Water Agencies. “It’s really the right thing to do.”

Up to 75% of all water used in Southern California is for irrigating yards and gardens. Water agencies dependent upon imported water from the state have had restrictions for much of the year, including limiting outdoor watering to just one day per week.

Last year, California Gov. Gavin Newsom called for residents and businesses to cut their water use by 15%. But since then, residents have reduced water use by just 5.2%, according to the State Water Resources Control Board.

Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Water District is investing in what could become the world’s largest water recycling system. Known as Pure Water, the initiative would recycle wastewater instead of sending it out into the ocean.

Trump and his MAGA political movement are done. Republicans need their version of Biden.

USA Today

Trump and his MAGA political movement are done. Republicans need their version of Biden.

Rex Huppke, USA TODAY – December 14, 2022

If we’ve learned anything from the past three national elections it’s this: Donald Trump and his “MAGA movement” have nothing to sell but crazy, and Americans aren’t buying it.

The 2022 midterm elections should’ve been a Republican blowout. They weren’t – at all – and it’s clear voters cared little about bizarre 2020 presidential election conspiracies and wanted nothing to do with fearmongering over drag queen shows or whatever other weird nonsense the MAGA-dominated Republican Party was peddling.

Add to that the GOP failures in the 2018 midterms and in the 2020 presidential election and it’s safe to say anyone who thinks Trump carries a popular message is allergic to popularity.

Trump’s MAGA movement failed, bigly

MAGA, as a winning political movement, is dead. And the results of an exclusive USA TODAY/Suffolk University Poll show a growing number of Republicans see Trump as a dead candidate walking.

Less than half of Republicans – 47% – now want him to run again, down considerably from July, when 60% wanted Trump to take another shot at the White House.

Don’t get your hopes up that GOP sanity will prevail

Before you spend a moment thinking the party faithful are breaking toward sanity, consider this from USA TODAY’s report on the same poll: “By 2-1, GOP and GOP-leaning voters now say they want Trump’s policies but a different standard-bearer to carry them. While 31% want the former president to run, 61% prefer some other Republican nominee who would continue the policies Trump has pursued.”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signs his "Stop Woke" bill in Hialeah Gardens on April 22, 2022.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signs his “Stop Woke” bill in Hialeah Gardens on April 22, 2022.

So rather than blame the message – which clearly doesn’t resonate with the masses – many Republican voters are blaming the messenger. And who is their next-in-line choice? Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a guy who, like Trump, has made snarling cruelty his brand by focusing on culture war issues like “critical race theory” and “wokeness,” all while scapegoating LGBTQ kids and painting school teachers as malevolent forces of liberal indoctrination.

No, no, no. Here’s a tip, Republicans. You don’t need a Trump-esque figure like DeSantis. You need your own version of Joe Biden.

Let me explain.

Cruelty just ain’t the political calling card it was back when Trump won

DeSantis’ war on “wokeness” and his faux-tough-guy stunt flying migrants to Martha’s Vineyard appeals to a narrow band of American voters, people who get a kick out of meanness and “owning the libs.”

That’s effectively what Trump did, and while he caught lightning in a bottle and won the 2016 presidential election, he and that whole jerk-ish attitude have been broadly rejected ever since:

People cheer as former President Donald Trump announces a third run for president as he speaks at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2022.
People cheer as former President Donald Trump announces a third run for president as he speaks at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2022.
  • Kari Lake tried it in the Arizona gubernatorial race. She lost.
  • Herschel Walker tried it in the Georgia U.S. Senate race. He lost.
  • Doug Mastriano tried it in the Pennsylvania gubernatorial race. He lost.
‘We choose sanity over chaos’

Katie Hobbs, the Democrat who won the Arizona governor’s race, put it perfectly in this recent tweet: “In this election, we chose solving our problems over conspiracy theories. We chose sanity over chaos. We chose unity over division.”

A crowd of supporters of former president Donald Trump on Nov. 15, 2022, in West Palm Beach, Fla.
A crowd of supporters of former president Donald Trump on Nov. 15, 2022, in West Palm Beach, Fla.

Voters chose sanity, as they did in the previous two election cycles. The noise and rancor and outrage that nourishes the 24-hour conservative media ecosystem resonates only in that bubble. Elsewhere, people don’t want bullies and fabulists. They want reasonable people who might actually stand a chance of getting something done.

Biden wasn’t many Democrats’ first choice, but …

In the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, liberal voters coalesced around Biden not because he was everyone’s favorite candidate but because he provided a sane counter to Trump. Democratic voters knew Biden would likely appeal to independents, who are often key to winning.

President Joe Biden speaks during a bill signing ceremony for the Respect for Marriage Act on Dec. 13, 2022.
President Joe Biden speaks during a bill signing ceremony for the Respect for Marriage Act on Dec. 13, 2022.

They were right. Biden won not by being some supercandidate or having a pop-culture-driven cult of personality. He ran by being the adult in the room.

Go on, Republicans! Go get yourself a RINO to return you to relevancy!

So if Republicans want a chance at appealing to a broader electorate, they need to find their own Biden. And it sure as heck isn’t an uncharismatic grump like DeSantis.

At the peak of Trump’s popularity with the Republican base, he would regularly lambaste members of his own party – like Rep. Liz Cheney and Sen. Mitt Romney – as RINOs, or Republicans In Name Only. It was stupid, of course – Cheney and Romney are closer to true conservatives than Trump could ever hope to be.

But if that’s how a RINO is defined by today’s Republican Party, then the party desperately needs to find itself a RINO to run for president.

R.I.P. MAGA. You will not be missed, not even a little.

Trumpism, the MAGA movement or whatever you want to call it has been thrice rejected. Younger voters in particular are repelled by culture-war fearmongering.

So Republicans need to offer more than bitterness toward liberals and performative acts of spite. Americans have clearly had it with pugilistic frauds.

The party that has developed an almost cult-like devotion to hating Biden and spinning him and his family into perverse conspiratorial narratives needs to recognize that nobody outside noisy social-media circles gives a hoot about Hunter Biden’s laptop.

In a fine bit of irony, the thing Republicans who loathe Joe Biden need right now, more than anything, is not Trump, not the MAGA movement and not Ron DeSantis.

It’s to find themselves a Joe Biden they can call their own.

These Are the 3 Supplements That Actually Boost Heart Health, New Study Shows

Martha Stewart – Living

These Are the 3 Supplements That Actually Boost Heart Health, New Study Shows

Nashia Baker – December 13, 2022

woman pouring vitamin supplements into hand
woman pouring vitamin supplements into hand

Jay Yuno / Getty Images

To live a long, active life, it’s important to care for your heart. And while that absolutely involves excellent nutrition and regular exercise, new research has discovered that you can further boost your heart health with three types of supplements. A study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, which reviewed 900 clinical trials and 27 types of micronutrients, found that there are certain supplements that have the biggest impact on the heart: They include omega-3 fatty acids, folic acid, and the antioxidant coenzyme Q10, Insider reports.

Per the research, omega-3 fatty acids, also known as fish oil, lower mortality risks from heart disease, while folic acid cuts an individual’s chances of experiencing a stroke. The antioxidant coenzyme Q10 reduces mortality risks from cardiovascular disease overall.

Related: Consuming More Omega-3s Can Improve Cognition and Brain Health in Your 40s and 50s, New Study Says

The team’s broad approach to supplement research helped them determine the best ones for heart health, said Simin Liu, MD, MS, MPH, ScD, professor of epidemiology and medicine at Brown University and a lead researcher for the study. “Research on micronutrient supplementation has mainly focused on the health effects of a single or a few vitamins and minerals,” Liu said. “We decided to take a comprehensive and systematic approach to evaluate all the publicly available and accessible studies reporting all micronutrients, including phytochemicals and antioxidant supplements, and their effects on cardiovascular risk factors as well as multiple cardiovascular diseases.”

Beta carotene, a naturally occurring pigment, proved to be a supplement that did not benefit the heart, the researchers’ findings uncovered. The pigment converts to vitamin A in the body, and can boost heart disease risks based on its toxicity; it can also cause bone aches, nausea, and hair loss, according to the US Preventive Services Task Force. The team also reported that vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, and selenium all had no direct correlation to reducing the risks of long-term cardiovascular disease.