We went to the anti-Trump protests. Here’s what surprised us the most.

We went to the anti-Trump protests. Here’s what surprised us the most.

Alice Tecotzky,Lakshmi Varanasi, and Lloyd Lee – April 5, 2025

Elon Musk says "Tesla Takedown" demonstrators were paid to protest after seeing videos

  • Protesters turned out in large numbers to nationwide demonstrations against the Trump administration.
  • Trump has upended government agencies, fired thousands of federal workers, and shaken the economy.
  • Many protesters told Business Insider they were worried about their retirement savings.

Last week, nationwide protests targeted Elon Musk for his role in dismantling government agencies and firing federal workers through the White House DOGE Office.

This week, they are targeting the man who gave him that role: President Donald Trump.

In coordinated demonstrations that organizers said took place across all 50 states, the “Hands Off!” protest accused Trump and his administration of championing policies that benefit the rich while making life harder for everyone else.

Business Insider sent reporters to protests in different parts of the country to hear from them directly. Many said they were most worried about the economy and their retirement investments, which have dwindled in tandem with Trump’s tariff announcements.

Trump says the tariffs will help jump-start US manufacturing, promote US goods, protect jobs and ultimately create more of them. He has urged Americans to wait out the initial market volatility and price increases.

That has, however, so far done little to alleviate fears. Here’s what protesters told us and what surprised us the most.

New York City
Crowd of anti-Trump protesters in Manhattan
A large crowd protests the Trump administration in Midtown Manhattan.Bryan Bedder/Getty Images for Community Change Action

As I rode the train from Brooklyn to Midtown Manhattan, the subway car filled with protesters, their cardboard signs bumping up against umbrellas on a rainy Saturday in New York.

By 1 p.m., the 42nd Street station was even more crowded than usual. Older people clutched slippery canes, and young kids clutched their parents’ hands. One man wore a once trendy Harris Walz camo hat. Another waved a small American flag, an unusual display of patriotism at anti-Trump rallies.

The damp horde of protesters shuffled toward Bryant Park, and in some ways, it all felt familiar. There were chants about abortion, signs featuring the face of now-deceased Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a progressive icon, and a steady cacophony of car horns.

But some things were different this time.

For one, the crowd looked older, with middle-aged Americans seeming to outnumber the 20-somethings that dominated rallies during the pandemic. It makes sense since many Americans are watching their retirement savings dwindle in the face of crashing markets and worry that staff cuts to the Social Security Administration could impact the crucial safety net.

While the anti-government protests held during Trump’s first term focused on social issues — like abortion and civil rights issues — many of the signs today targeted the economy.

A protest sign in Manhattan.
A protest sign at the Manhattan demonstration.Alice Tecotzky/Business Insider

Most of the people I spoke to didn’t want to share their last names because they worried about their privacy in the current political environment. Yet they weren’t shy about their rage and despair.

Dorothy Auer, 62, told me she wished people would get angrier.

“I’ve been working for over 40 years, and I looked at my investments yesterday — my retirement plan — and I literally don’t think I’ll ever be able to retire,” she said, starting to choke up.

Wiping her eyes with her free hand — the other held a black and white sign bashing Musk — Auer told me it’s distressing to see a man of such wealth “turn around and crap on us.”

Jian, 33, held a sign that read, “Tariffs are killing my 401(k),” but he told me he’s most upset about what’s happening to his retired father.

“My dad just lost about 25% of his savings in the last three days because of the tariffs,” he said.

It’s not just the economy, of course, that brought thousands of people out to Midtown Manhattan.

Penny, 54, said the Trump administration affected virtually every issue she cares about. Even so, we ended up talking about Musk.

“I’m horrified that a person who wasn’t born here, wasn’t elected, seems to be getting carte blanche to do whatever he wants in our government,” she said. “How did he get a security clearance?”

Most of those I talked to as they slowly trudged toward Madison Square Park didn’t think the protest would change Trump’s mind.

A few said they hoped Congress would pay attention, but more than that, people said they felt they needed to do something.

“Even if it’s sort of hopeless right now, at least it’s showing people that we’re here,” Pyare, 49, told me. “And that we don’t like it.”

Novi, Michigan

Another week, another protest.

On Saturday, I attended the Hands Off! rally in Novi, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit where 55% of the vote went to Kamala Harris during the election. Thousands of people showed up.

The crowd was emotionally charged and united by the spirit of collective action. Many attendees said they were first-time protesters. The Tesla Takedown protests I attended last weekend seemed somber by comparison. Protesters here got loud.

charcoal drawing of statue of liberty
The artist calls herself the “Old Lady Army Fighting for Democracy” or “OLAFFD.”Lakshmi Varanasi

“Call me Old Lady Army Fighting for Democracy,” one 66-year-old woman, who didn’t want to give her real name, told me. She held up a sign she had made. It was a charcoal drawing of the Statue of Liberty, whose hands covered her eyes in shame.

“I just copied this off of Facebook,” she said. But to her it symbolized that “everything that our country stands for is being destroyed, and the world is looking at us.”

Liana Gettel.
A pin that said “Keep your laws off my body” was of several Liana Gettel, 58, was wearing at the Hands Off! rally in Novi, Michigan.Lakshmi Varanasi

Liana Gettel, 58, said she was outraged for several reasons, including the administration’s stance on abortion. She said she had an abortion 29 years ago.

“I had lost a child. The child would not come out on its own. So I had to have a procedure. Had I not had that procedure, I wouldn’t be here,” she said. “And that’s what they want to block, is things like that?”

Protesters targeted many different issues, including abortion, trans, and minority rights. One protester holding up a sign for trans rights said, “Trans people are just the appetizer, but everyone will be on the menu now.”

The line echoed remarks made by human rights advocate Channyn Lynne Parker at the Rally for Trans Visibility in Chicago last weekend.

Trans right
Protesters at the Hands Off! rally fought for many causes, including trans rights.Lakshmi Varanasi

Unlike protests during Trump’s first term, which focused on social issues, however, many people today were also worried about the president’s economic policies.

Matt Watts said he was protesting Musk’s takeover of Social Security and Trump’s tariffs on “countries that don’t deserve it.” After the stock market began to take a hit from all the talk of tariffs, Watts said he took his money out of his 401(k) and invested it into a more stable fund. “I’m getting ready to retire pretty soon. I’ve got to count on that savings,” he said.

Most protesters were middle-aged or older, but they captured some younger activists with their energy.

Novi protestors
Yajat Verma, 18, and Patricia, 53.Lakshmi Varanasi

Yajat Verma, 18, said he hadn’t known about the protest but was driving by with a friend when he saw the crowd. He decided to join in and started handing out water bottles to protesters.

“Everyone should be protesting,” he said.

San Francisco
Protesters in front of city hall building
Thousands of protesters gathered at Civic Center Plaza near San Francisco City Hall.Lloyd Lee

Protesters crowding together near the San Francisco City Hall had much to be angry about.

On one end of the 150,000 square-foot Civic Center Plaza, a man’s voice boomed through the microphone about the dangers of fascism and how it was time for people to go “on the offensive.”

On the other end was Michelle Gutierrez Vo, president of the California Nurses Association, warning folks about Trump’s move to strip federal workers of their union rights.

With so many grievances against the current administration in the air, some protesters resorted to bullet-point lists of the issues on large signs.

Protesters holding a sign
Protesters hold signs listing several issues they have with the Trump administration.Lloyd Lee

That spoke to one of the concerns for Maria, a 67-year-old San Francisco resident who declined to provide her last name.

“My focus has been a lot about the environment,” Maria told BI, later adding, “There’s so much going on right now, but I know it’s important to try and stay focused on one thing and hope other people are focused on the other things.”

Maria’s friend chimed in, saying she was worried about her Social Security, which she said she had been paying into for six decades.

For Frida Ruiz, 18, a student at the University of San Francisco who held a sign that read “Billionaire Cucks,” Trump’s stance on immigration hits close to home as a daughter of Mexican immigrant parents.

For George Chikovani, a 42-year-old SF resident, who came to protest with his wife Lisa Isola, 40, and their three-year-old and 10-months-old children, his most personal issue was the Ukraine war.

“My grandmother is from Ukraine and then I grew up in Georgia, so that cause has felt very personal to me. I still have family and friends there,” Chikovani said.

At least 7,500 people gathered near city hall on Saturday afternoon, according to an officer with the San Francisco Police Department. 

Protesters in costume
Some protesters were in full-body costumes.Lloyd Lee

As my colleague observed in New York, older millennials and seniors made up large swaths of the crowd. Some came out in full costumes, sticking true to SF’s colorful character.

Maria, who is also a member of Third Act, a left-leaning political advocacy group focused on mobilizing senior voters, said she was encouraged by people who came out to protest but was “hoping to see more.”

“We need more younger people to come,” she said.

More in U.S.
USA TODAY: US military takes an abrupt turn after decades of climate change research

Trump, Elon Musk ‘Hands Off’ protest in Palm Beach Gardens

Palm Beach Daily News

Trump, Elon Musk ‘Hands Off’ protest in Palm Beach Gardens

Maya Washburn and Jennifer Sangalang – April 4, 2025

More than one thousand people lined the north and south side of PGA Boulevard near Kew Gardens Avenue with handmade signs as part of the national Hands Off! protests in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., on April 5, 2025.

PALM BEACH GARDENS – People are taking to the streets to make one message clear to President Donald Trump and Elon Musk: “Hands off!”

According to USA TODAY, there are more than 1,000 protests across the nation against Trump and Musk scheduled for Saturday, April 5, 2025. Three of those protests are in Palm Beach County, including one in Palm Beach Gardens.

Trump returned to Florida on Thursday, April 3, with trips to three of his golf courses (including one in Jupiter) high on his agenda for his weekend trip to the Sunshine State – the same weekend that the nationwide protests are planned against him. Some will happen just down the road from his private club, Mar-a-Lago.

Many of these Hands Off Mass Mobilization rallies have “Hands Off!” plus the name of the city and state and “fight back!” in their titles. They are happening just days after April 2, what Trump called “Liberation Day,” when he imposed sweeping tariffs affecting all U.S. trading partners and imports.

Trump in Jupiter: What is Trump doing in Jupiter this weekend? What we know

Where is the Trump, Musk protest in northern Palm Beach County? Intersection near Barnes & Noble

There will be a Hands Off rally in Palm Beach Gardens on April 5 from 10 a.m. to noon at Campus Drive and PGA Boulevard near Barnes & Noble and Palm Beach County Library.

According to the Hands Off Mass Mobilization website, handsoff2025.comFlorida will host 45 rallies − including at least one in Spanish − on Saturday, April 5, 2025, at various times and locations.

Where are Trump, Musk protests in Palm Beach County?

There are three Hands Off rallies this weekend in Palm Beach County:

  • Boca Raton, Florida: Hands Off! Boca Raton Indivisible Fights Back rally will be from 1 to 2:30 p.m. EDT Saturday, April 5, 2025, at City Hall, 201 W. Palmetto Park Road, Boca Raton, near the Boca Raton Museum of Art, Brightline Boca Raton Station and Ichiyami Buffet and Sushi.
  • Palm Beach Gardens, Florida: Hands Off! Palm Beach County Fights Back rally will be from 10 a.m. to noon EDT Saturday, April 5, 2025, at Campus Drive and PGA Boulevard in Palm Beach Gardens near Barnes & Noble and Palm Beach County Library.
  • West Palm Beach, Florida: Hands Off! Palm Beach Fights Back rally will be from 3 to 5 p.m. EDT Saturday, April 5, 2025, at Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, near Clematis Street, Elisabetta’s Ristorante and West Palm Beach GreenMarket.

Trump, Elon Musk protests: Florida has 45 in one day, including some near Mar-a-Lago

What is Hands Off?

Hands Off is the title, filter and group behind the “mass mobilization” nationwide rallies and protests aimed at Trump and Musk, SpaceX and Tesla CEO who is leading the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE for short.

Most of the Hands Off Fight Back rallies on Saturday, April 5, 2025, have this message online: “Donald Trump and Elon Musk think this country belongs to them. We are fighting back! They’re taking everything they can get their hands on — our health care, our data, our jobs, our services — and daring the world to stop them. This is a crisis, and the time to act is now. On Saturday, April 5th, we’re taking to the streets to fight back with a clear message: Hands off!

“This mass mobilization day is our message to the world that we do not consent to the destruction of our government and our economy for the benefit of Trump and his billionaire allies. Alongside Americans across the country, we are marching, rallying, and protesting to demand a stop the chaos and build an opposition movement against the looting of our country.

“A core principle behind all Hands Off! events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values. Check out handsoff2025.com for more information.”

Why are people protesting Trump and Musk at Hands Off rallies?

Topics and signs will likely include:

Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, jobs, abortion, fair elections, personal data, public lands, veteran services, cancer research, NATO, consumer protections, clean air, clean energy, schools, libraries, free speech, LGBTQ+ rights, immigrants and courts, the rally site states.

The theme of the “fight back,” nonviolent, peaceful protest rallies are, “We must stop Trump and Musk’s illegal, billionaire power grab.”

Maya Washburn covers northern Palm Beach County for The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida-Network. 

NC Supreme Court race ruling is a dangerous attack on voters who followed the rules

The News & Observer – Opinion

NC Supreme Court race ruling is a dangerous attack on voters who followed the rules | Opinion

The Editorial Board – April 4, 2025

Hundreds of demonstrators rally at the North Carolina State Capitol on Monday, Feb. 17, 2025. The rally, organized by Common Cause, protested Republican state Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin’s challenge of 65,000 ballots in November’s election. He trails Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs.More

Roughly 65,000 votes are just a step away from being thrown out after the North Carolina Court of Appeals sided with Jefferson Griffin in his lawsuit seeking to overturn the state Supreme Court race he lost by 734 votes out of more than 5 million cast.

In a stunning decision that changes the rules of an election after that election has occurred, the court ruled that the vast majority of the votes in question must be recounted and verified, and voters will be given 15 days to “cure” their ballots by providing documentation to verify their identities.

The ruling creates a dangerous precedent for overturning an election result that the loser simply doesn’t like.

The decision by a three-judge panel broke along party lines, with two Republicans in support of Griffin’s appeal and Democrat Judge Toby Hampson issuing a lengthy dissent, rejects rulings by the State Board of Elections and a Wake Superior Court judge who found the board ruled correctly.

The case is now almost certain to go to the Republican-controlled state Supreme Court, where Griffin’s opponent in the race, Justice Allison Riggs, will recuse herself. If the state Supreme Court upholds the appeals court’s ruling, it will be a new extreme in judicial partisanship and a national embarrassment for North Carolina.

The ruling also places an extraordinary burden on voters who must now defend their legitimacy despite the fact that they did nothing wrong. In most cases, those voters simply did not have a driver’s license number or Social Security number attached to their voter registration. That could be because the directions on their registration form were unclear, or because there was a typo or other clerical error in the database. Republicans argue that means their identities cannot be verified, even though those voters were required to show ID in order to cast their vote.

Giving the affected voters the opportunity to cure their ballots does not make this decision any less an act of disenfranchisement. It’s fantastical to think that any meaningful share of those voters will provide the missing information in such a tight window, especially those living overseas who may not even receive notice until the 15 days are nearly over.

It’s worth noting that Griffin has not been able to prove that any of the voters he is challenging were actually ineligible to vote. Yet he — and the court — are fervent in their assertion that those votes may well be illegal.

As Hampson wrote in his dissent: “Petitioner has not established that any one of the ballots he challenges was cast by an unlawfully registered voter. Therefore, Petitioner has not met his burden of establishing probable cause to believe a violation of election law has occurred.”

Even more ridiculous is the fact that the new standard is not being evenly applied — the votes Griffin chose to challenge disproportionately belong to demographics or counties that lean Democratic. Only these specific ballots, in this specific race, are at risk of being thrown out. It undermines the public’s faith in our elections and in the judges that are apparently willing to overturn them.

Friday’s ruling sends the unwelcome message that the right to vote in North Carolina may be more fragile than ever. Even if you follow the rules, that right can still be taken away from you months later by judges who believe themselves more bound to partisanship than to the law. It’s a shame for democracy, and a shame for North Carolina.

Countries boost recruitment of American scientists amid cuts to scientific funding

NPR – National

Countries boost recruitment of American scientists amid cuts to scientific funding

Chandelis Duster – March 29, 2025

People walk past the faculty of economy of the Aix-Marseille University in Marseille on Oct. 4, 2023.

People walk past the faculty of economy of the Aix-Marseille University in Marseille on Oct. 4, 2023.Christophe Simon/AFP via Getty Images

As the Trump administration and Elon Musk’s DOGE seek to reduce the federal workforce and cut spending, some European countries are looking to capitalize on the opportunity by recruiting talent from the scientific community.

The administration’s actions, including eliminating programs and funding for scientific research, are prompting some researchers and scientists to consider leaving the U.S. to live in other countries, such as France, to continue their work.

According to a survey released by the journal Nature on Thursday, more than 1,200 respondents who identified as scientists said they were considering leaving the U.S. and relocating to Europe or Canada because of President Trump’s actions. Approximately 1,650 people completed the survey, which was posted on the journal’s website, social media and an e-mailed newsletter, according to the journal.

Jennifer Jones, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, tells NPR that she has spoken with scientists, some of whom currently work at federal agencies and others who have been fired. Many of them say they are looking for opportunities abroad due to a lack of options for conducting their research with the government or at universities, Jones says.

“There’s another bucket of folks as well, and those are folks who are just worried in general about the intimidation, fear and harassment that they are facing,” she says. “This could be a result of the kind of work that they’re doing. They might be doing work around issues of diversity, equity, [and] inclusion, trying to broaden participation in our STEM or science, technology, engineering, math fields. These could be folks working on issues of climate change, of vaccine safety.”

Jones also says she has spoken with scientists who said after the 2024 presidential election, they “began seeking and have acquired positions overseas.”

“They would have started that process before inauguration and before the last few weeks,” Jones says.

Helping as many scientists as possible

The U.S. has historically been viewed as a leading country for research, having actively recruited scientists from around the world for significant projects and studies. For example, when the Manhattan Project began in December 1941, it was a top-secret research initiative by the U.S. government that ultimately led to the development of the first atomic bombs. Scientists from Europe were specifically sought out to help with the project. Many of these European scientists were already living in the U.S. after being displaced because of the turmoil of WWII or fleeing from Nazism and fascism.Sponsor Message

American scientists conducting research in other countries is not a new phenomenon, and there are programs where American students and scientists can study abroad, Sudip Parikh, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, tells NPR. But the growing number of American scientists considering leaving the U.S. due to uncertainty in the U.S. is not normal, he says.

It’s something that’s ramped up and it has a different messaging, which is saying, ‘There’s uncertainty there. Come to us,’ ” Parikh says of efforts by other countries to recruit scientists and researchers from the United States.

In response to these recent developments, schools in France, including the prestigious CentraleSupélec, have established funds to support American scientists. The engineering school announced last week that it has allocated 3 million euros (around $3.2 million) to finance research projects that can no longer continue in the U.S. Additionally, earlier this month, Aix-Marseille Université — one of the oldest and largest universities in France, with roots tracing back to1409 and approximately 80,000 students — announced it is accepting applications for its Safe Place For Science program.

The program aims to offer “a safe and stimulating environment for scientists wishing to pursue their research in complete freedom” and will support about 15 American scientists with a total fund of up to 15 million euros (around $16.2 million) over three years. The university has already received more than 150 applications, according to a public relations agency representing the university.

“We are witnessing a new brain drain. We will do everything in our power to help as many scientists as possible continue their research,” Éric Berton, president of the university, said in a statement. “However, we cannot meet all demands on our own. The Ministry of Education and Research is fully supporting and assisting us in this effort, which is intended to expand at both national and European levels.”

Other countries are also actively seeking to attract American scientists. For instance, the Netherlands is also launching a fund to support American scientists as well as those from other countries. Minister of Education, Culture and Science Eppo Bruins informed the parliament in a letter last week that he requested the country’s science financier to set up a fund aimed at bringing top international scientists to the Netherlands as soon as possible.

“The world is changing. Tensions are increasing. We see that more and more scientists are looking for another place to do their work,” Bruins wrote in the letter. “I want more international top scientists to come and do that here. After all, top scientists are worth their weight in gold for our country and for Europe.”

While it remains unclear what funding will be available for scientific research from the U.S. government and for universities, Parikh says he is encouraging scientists working here not to leave.

“Over the last 80 years, we have built the greatest innovation engine that the world’s ever seen and it’s delivered cures and treatments for disease. It has delivered economic growth and jobs. And the other countries have paid attention and they wanna copy it and we shouldn’t make it easy for them,” he says.

NPR’s Geoff Brumfiel contributed to this report.

SHOTS – HEALTH NEWS
Trump wants to erase DEI. Researchers worry it will upend work on health disparity
TREATMENTS
National Science Foundation freezes grant review in response to Trump executive orders
POLITICS
Trump team revokes $11 billion in funding for addiction, mental health care

Donald Trump Fell for Elon Musk’s Big Con

The New Republic

Donald Trump Fell for Elon Musk’s Big Con

Ross Rosenfeld – April 1, 2025

Wednesday is Liberation Day, and one person might be even more excited about it than Donald Trump is: Elon Musk. While much of what the president will announce from the Rose Garden on April 2 remains a mystery, Trump has already declared that 25 percent tariffs will kick in this week on imported cars and light trucks—to be followed by tariffs on auto parts as well. Economistscar dealers, and consumers are sounding the alarm, and rightly so. “If the taxes are fully passed onto consumers,” the AP reports, “the average auto price on an imported vehicle could jump by $12,500.” But Trump said he “couldn’t care less” if that happens because then “people are gonna buy American-made cars. We have plenty.”

Well, not really. There is no such thing as a truly American-made car, if you take into account the origin of the parts. And even “American” brands, like General Motors and Ford, assemble a significant amount of their vehicles abroad. But when looking for the most American-made vehicles, one manufacturer stands out: Tesla. Its fleet is 100 percent assembled in the United States.

This is just the latest of many examples—almost too many to count—of Trump’s policies redounding directly to Musk’s benefit. From executive orders to foreign misadventures, much of what crosses Trump’s desk or flits through his birdbrain is in Musk’s material interest. Even Trump’s own political interests are taking a back seat to enriching Musk, who donated nearly $300 million last year to help Trump and his MAGA minions get elected. The generous (albeit still damning) interpretation is that the president is merely returning that favor; less favorably, he’s in Musk’s back pocket. Either way, the great con man Trump has met his match—now he’s the one being conned.

The Tesla CEO claimed last week that his company will also be significantly impacted by the tariffs because it imports some of its auto parts. But because Tesla’s vehicles are made in California and Texas, and it imports fewer parts by value than other manufacturers, it will have a tremendous competitive advantage.

And even if the tariffs do ding Tesla, well, Musk can take heart that he’s making off like a bandit in so many other respects under the Trump administration.

Last week, Trump sent JD Vance to Greenland, where the vice president said the territory’s mother country, Denmark, had “underinvested” in the island’s people and its “beautiful landmass.” It’s the latter that so intrigues Musk and others in Silicon Valley, since the resources there—an abundance of rare earth elements needed for lithium-ion batteries, on which Teslas run—could represent a major windfall for the tech industry. No wonder Musk tweeted earlier this year, “If the people of Greenland want to be part of America, which I hope they do, they would be most welcome!”

Of course, Trump’s obsession with critical minerals has also played a major role in the batshit negotiations over ending Russia’s war on Ukraine. The president twice mentioned the embattled country’s “rare earth” when he proposed a “deal” to end the war that was really more of an extortion attempt—asking Ukraine to pay the U.S. $500 billion in minerals in exchange for continued American aid. This eventually led to Trump and Vance’s embarrassing Oval Office ambush of Volodymyr Zelenskiy, for which Musk had helped set the stage by laying accusations against the Ukrainian president and repeatedly suggesting he be removed.

Other proposals have Musk’s fingerprints all over them as well. As Paul Waldman pointed out for TNR, a Biden-era program to improve broadband access and service in areas of the country that lack high-speed internet is now being revised in a way that will allow Musk’s satellite internet provider, Starlink, to underbid competitors and secure $20 billion in government funding—while also providing service that is inferior to the fiber connections that the program favored. Unsurprisingly, the advantages that Musk will receive have been presented as a win for the American people. The former head of the program hit the nail on the head: “Stranding all or part of rural America with worse internet so that we can make the world’s richest man even richer is yet another in a long line of betrayals by Washington.”

In fact, Starlink keeps showing up these days. What explains Musk’s animosity toward USAID, which his Department of Government Efficiency has been busy dismantling? Perhaps it stems from the agency’s investigation of its contract with the company to provide Ukraine with internet access. Starlink has also been installed throughout the White House campus and at the DOGE-allied General Services Administration.

Nothing Musk does runs contrary to his own ambition. Starlink is a wholly owned subsidiary of SpaceX, which Musk founded. He didn’t appreciate the Federal Aviation Administration’s probe of his company, so he launched an online campaign pressuring its head, Michael Whitaker, to resign and then axed many others at the agency—exacerbating a staffing crisis that has coincided with several deadly collisions. Not to worry: The FAA is going to be using Starlink for its soon-to-be upgraded technology networks. You can be sure the competition for the contract was fierce.

Must be a coincidence, too, that SpaceX engineer Theodore Malaska happens to be just the right person to serve at the FAA, where he’s been granted an ethics waiver to oversee projects that directly impact the company he works for. Ordinarily such a situation might raise ethics concerns, given the clear conflict of interest and lack of governmental impartiality, but it’s alright because we all know Musk wouldn’t engage in anything unethical, right? Otherwise we might also be suspicious of the fact that, while DOGE is going around infiltrating and cutting agencies, it’s essentially suggested no spending cuts to NASA or the Pentagon, both of which have massively increased their investments in SpaceX.ADVERTISEMENTAdvertisement

That wasn’t the case with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which has seen a 10 percent workforce reduction, possibly impeding the six investigations it was conducting into Tesla’s self-driving technology.

But we can trust Musk to oversee himself, we’re told. Just last week, he negotiated with himself so that his xAI company could purchase his X social media platform, claiming respective valuations of $80 billion and $33 billion—both undoubtedly inflated figures. In fairness, all that really matters in such an arrangement is the stock ratio for investors, but Reuters did note that it was “unclear … whether there would be regulatory scrutiny.” Such scrutiny would come from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which Musk’s DOGE team has invaded.

Similarly, Trump is attempting to eliminate the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which, if successful, would eliminate the government agency that had planned to regulate Musk’s proposed mobile payments service on X. Yet Musk’s ambitions go well beyond digital payments. Combining xAI with X and its Grok service will position him well to embark on an even bolder agenda that will leave the federal government more dependent on him and his companies than ever: Musk has instituted an AI takeover of government data, potentially making him and xAI indispensable to future government operations.

Even before Musk fully sinks his AI claws into our government, it’s hard to overstate the leverage Musk now has. Through his effective control of both the General Services Administration and the Office of Personnel Management, Musk oversees hirings and firings, data systems, federal buildings, and government vehicles. Perhaps that explains why the State Department is expected to spend around $400 million to purchase Teslas to transport diplomats. The question is whether any foreign representatives will want to be seen being shepherded around town in a vehicle that has become synonymous with cruelty and douchebaggery.

In fact, the one thing Musk didn’t seem to plan on when he spun his big con of Trump was the blowback he’d receive. The resistance, declared dead by many as Trump took office for his second term, has shown signs of life of late, as growing anti-Musk sentiment has been directed in part at Teslas—including large protests at its dealerships across the country. I guess that recent Tesla infomercial on the White House lawn, yet another example of Trump doing Musk a solid, has backfired.

The key to pulling off a big con, Henry Gondorff tells Johnny Hooker in 1973’s The Sting, is maintaining the façade: “He can’t know you took him.” Right now, that’s exactly what Musk is doing with Trump. For the low price of $288 million—chump change when you’re the world’s richest person, valued at $350 billion—Musk has been handed the keys to the U.S. government and given the run of the place, while Trump seems to have convinced himself that he’s still in charge. Meanwhile, angry crowds are storming Republican town halls, furious that DOGE is killing jobs, destroying vital services, and attacking the social safety net while enriching Musk. Elections are turning in Democrats’ favor, potentially imperiling Trump’s power to enact his agenda. And yet, there sits the duped president behind the Resolute Desk, grinning like a senile old lady who’s happily given out her bank card and Social Security number to a cunning younger man with an accent.

McConnell warns of ‘embarrassing naivete’ in Trump admin’s dealings with Putin while sharply criticizing Ukraine policy

CNN

McConnell warns of ‘embarrassing naivete’ in Trump admin’s dealings with Putin while sharply criticizing Ukraine policy

Morgan Rimmer and Manu Raju, CNN – March 28, 2025

Sen. Mitch McConnell arrives prior to the Senate Republicans weekly policy luncheon, in the US Capitol on March 25 in Washington, DC. - Al Drago/Getty Images
Sen. Mitch McConnell arrives prior to the Senate Republicans weekly policy luncheon, in the US Capitol on March 25 in Washington, DC. – Al Drago/Getty Images

Former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell sharply criticized the Trump administration’s Ukraine policy and pivot toward isolationism Thursday night, accusing President Donald Trump’s advisers of showing “their embarrassing naivete” in dealings with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

McConnell, a staunch supporter of Ukraine who delivered remarks while being awarded the US-Ukraine Foundation’s highest honor, warned that “some of the president’s advisers” are urging Trump to pull back from supporting the war-torn nation, and argued that such a move would be a sign of “weakness.”

“This war is a reminder that what happens in one region has implications in another. That weakness in the face of one adversary would invite aggression from another even closer to home. That our credibility was not divisible,” McConnell said. “Allies half a world away in Asia have told us the same – that Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression matters to those who live in China’s shadow.”

“America can’t afford to ignore these lessons. But that’s exactly what some of the president’s advisers are urging him to do.”

The pointed remarks from McConnell come as Trump has spoken with Putin twice since taking office – breaking a sustained period of silence between the White House and the Kremlin – and follow the president’s fiery Oval Office meeting with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky late last month.

McConnell’s desire for an active US role in deterring aggression from Russia in Ukraine has put him at odds with a growing share of the Republican electorate, which has embraced Trump’s more isolationist view. And while the Kentucky Republican has largely voted with Trump during his tenure, he recently put himself at odds with nearly all Senate Republicans when he cast a trio of votes against Trump’s Cabinet nominees – including for the critical defense secretary and director of national intelligence roles.

In turn, McConnell, the longest-serving leader in Senate history when he stepped down from the role in November, has drawn Trump’s ire.

McConnell on Thursday noted that the US’ allies and adversaries are watching closely as the administration praises Putin.

“When the president’s envoys trumpet the magnanimity of a thuggish autocrat, they do so under the watchful eyes of his friends in Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang. When his representatives in negotiations masquerade as neutral arbiters, or legitimize sham elections, or treat aggressor and victim as morally equivalent, they do so in full view of longtime partners across the globe – some who know the taste of aggression, and some who have good reason to fear its imminent arrival,” McConnell said.

“When American officials court the favor of an adversary at the expense of allies. When they mock our friends to impress an enemy. They reveal their embarrassing naivete.”

The former GOP leader pointed to former President Ronald Reagan’s military buildup and the end of the Cold War, and specifically what he said is “the most popular phrase in Washington today: peace through strength.”

“But too many of those who use it – particularly among the president’s advisers – don’t seem ready to summon the resources and national will it requires,” he argued.

McConnell ended with a stark warning: “To cut off Ukraine is to stab ourselves in the back. So is the denigration of allies who have fought and died alongside us.”

Ukraine’s spy agency says Russia believes it must end the war by 2026 or risk falling far behind the US and China

Business Insider

Ukraine’s spy agency says Russia believes it must end the war by 2026 or risk falling far behind the US and China

Matthew Loh – March 28, 2025

  • The deputy head of Ukraine’s GUR said the Kremlin forecasts a need to end the war by 2026.
  • Vadym Skibitsky said Moscow is likely concerned about its long-term ability to compete with the US.
  • If the war drags on, its relevance could be relegated just to Eastern Europe, Skibitsky said.

Ukraine’s intelligence agency said on Tuesday that Russia likely believes it must resolve its war with Kyiv by 2026, or eventually lose its chances of competing with the US and China on the world stage.

Maj. Gen. Vadym Skibitsky, a spokesperson for Ukraine’s military intelligence agency GUR, referenced forecast documents from the Kremlin at a press event in Kyiv about European security.

Business Insider could not independently verify the existence and authenticity of these documents.

“We can say that the Russian Federation has clearly defined in these documents that the Ukrainian issue must be resolved by 2026,” said Skibitsky, who is also deputy head of GUR.

Vadym Skibitskyi is seen giving an interview with Ukrainian news media in January 2024.
Skibitsky, pictured here during a separate January 2024 interview, is deputy head of the GUR.Global Images Ukraine/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

“Because if the war continues for another five to 10 years, Russia will never be able to catch up and reach the same level as the United States and China,” he added.

Should this happen, Russia could stand to “forever remain a regional player” in Eastern Europe, Skibitsky said.

“And the Russian Federation clearly understands this today. That is why it foresees this in the future,” he said.

Skibitsky said such Russian forecasts typically combine work from government ministries, federal agencies, and research institutions, and that the Kremlin’s plans had described war scenarios as far in the future as 2045. These included conflict scenarios with Northern European states, Poland, and the Baltics, Skibitsky said.

The deputy spy chief’s comments come as the White House has sought to push Ukraine and Russia toward a cease-fire. The effort has surfaced new questions about how long the war will last — and concerns in Ukraine that the resulting peace might only be achieved by giving Russia outsize concessions.

In early March, The Washington Post reported that an influential think tank in Moscow had assessed that a “peaceful resolution” to the war by 2026 would be impossible.

According to the Post, the analysis recommended a hardline, maximalist stance toward negotiations with the US and Ukraine. However, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told the outlet that the federal government “was not aware of such recommendations” and was working with “more considered options.”

Ukraine thinks Russia’s costs are too high

The head of GUR, Kyrylo Budanov, recently voiced a similar assessment of Moscow needing a 2026 deadline.

“If they don’t end this war by 2026, they lose even a chance for global leadership,” he told state broadcaster Ukrinform on February 27. “They will be left with, at most, a regional leadership level, which is absolutely unacceptable to them.”

Budanov said that a protracted war would undermine Russia’s ability to innovate in tech and compete with the US on the world stage, especially with its ability to contest the Arctic regions.

“The cost of the war is too high — the financial cost,” he told Ukrinform.

Washington’s leaders consider Russia as one of two near-peer competitors or potential adversaries, meaning that it has a chance of being comparable to US military might.

The other is China, which leaders in both the Biden and Trump administrations have repeatedly said is the Pentagon’s main priority for preparing against threats.

The Russian Defense Ministry and the Kremlin’s press office did not respond to requests for comment sent by BI.

Trump weighs in on House special election races in Florida as GOP fights to keep majority

ABC News

Trump weighs in on House special election races in Florida as GOP fights to keep majority

Oren Oppenheim – March 28, 2025

In a pair of back-to-back rallies held over the phone on Thursday night, President Donald Trump praised the two Republican candidates in the upcoming special elections for Florida’s 6th and 1st Congressional districts, amid recent concerns among Republicans over whether their candidate in the 6th Congressional District, State Sen. Randy Fine, can keep the seat in Republican hands.

Fine has lagged behind his Democratic opponent, Josh Weil, in fundraising, and Republicans have expressed concerns about his campaign, although many still believe he will be able to hold the seat in the ruby-red district.

The special election in Florida’s 6th Congressional District, which is on the state’s eastern coast and includes the city of Daytona Beach, is being held on Tuesday, April 1, to fill the vacancy created by former Rep. Mike Waltz when he resigned to become Trump’s national security adviser.

MORE: ‘Proud to be a team player,’ Stefanik says after Trump pulls UN nomination

PHOTO: President Donald Trump speaks to the media in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, March 26, 2025.  (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)
PHOTO: President Donald Trump speaks to the media in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, March 26, 2025. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

The tele-rallies also came amid broader concerns among Republicans about maintaining their razor-thin majority in the U.S. House, and on the same day that Trump asked Rep. Elise Stefanik to withdraw her nomination to be United Nations ambassador, citing “a very tight Majority” in the U.S. House.

House Republicans currently hold a narrow majority with 218 Republicans to 213 Democrats. Speaker Mike Johnson has a two-vote cushion for his majority.

Fine, at the start of the telephone rally for him, emphatically praised Trump and said he would serve in Congress as one of the president’s strongest allies.

PHOTO: Florida State Rep. Randy Fine, answers a question about his House Bill 3-C: Independent Special Districts in the House of Representatives, April 20, 2022, at the Capitol in Tallahassee, Fla.  (Phil Sears/AP, Files)
PHOTO: Florida State Rep. Randy Fine, answers a question about his House Bill 3-C: Independent Special Districts in the House of Representatives, April 20, 2022, at the Capitol in Tallahassee, Fla. (Phil Sears/AP, Files)More

“Mr. President, I’m immensely grateful for your unwavering support, trust and confidence in me. I believe that God saved your life in Butler, Pennsylvania, so that you could save the world,” Fine said, referencing the July assassination attempt Trump survived. “And it will be one of the most profound honors of my life to be one of your foot soldiers as you make America great again.”

Trump praised Fine’s early endorsement of him during the 2024 election cycle, adding, “that’s why Randy will always have a very open door to the Oval Office. He will be there whenever I need him, and he wants to be there whenever we need him. He wants to be there for you.”

MORE: Republicans raise concerns about Florida special election as candidates vie to replace Mike Waltz

“I’ve gotten to know him under pressure situations, and he can react well under pressure. So go vote for Randy,” Trump said later.

Fine reiterated he would work to carry out Trump’s agenda in Congress.

“It’s not overstating things to say that your agenda is at stake in this election, and this district can’t let you down. Your agenda is on the ballot on April 1,” he said.

MORE: Democrats push to emphasize ‘fight’ post-Signal scandal, but is that enough?: ANALYSIS

During the earlier telephone rally supporting the Republican candidate in the 1st Congressional District, Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, Trump praised Patronis’ work in Florida and framed the special election as important for his own agenda.

That special election, which will determine who takes the seat vacated by now-former Rep. Matt Gaetz, has gotten less concern from Republicans.

PHOTO: Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis speaks during a meeting between Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state cabinet at the Florida capitol in Tallahassee, Fla., Mar. 5, 2025. (Rebecca Blackwell/AP, Files)
PHOTO: Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis speaks during a meeting between Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state cabinet at the Florida capitol in Tallahassee, Fla., Mar. 5, 2025. (Rebecca Blackwell/AP, Files)More

“The 1st Congressional District is special, and I won it by a lot, and Jimmy is going to win it by a lot. And remember, you’re five days away from this all important special election taking place in your district on Tuesday, April 1, so April Fool’s Day. So it’s going to be the fool for the Democrat candidate, who happens to be terrible,” Trump said of Patronis’ Democratic opponent Gay Valimont, a gun violence prevention activist.

Praising Patronis, Trump said, “Jimmy’s done an outstanding job as the chief financial officer of the state of Florida, helping to guide your state to tremendous economic success. And now he wants to keep on fighting for Florida in Congress.”

‘Something stinks’: Elon Musk, congressional Republicans target Democrats’ main fundraising machine

CNN

‘Something stinks’: Elon Musk, congressional Republicans target Democrats’ main fundraising machine

Fredreka Schouten, CNN – March 28, 2025

This 2018 photo shows an ActBlue office in Somerville, Massachusetts. - Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe/Getty Images
This 2018 photo shows an ActBlue office in Somerville, Massachusetts. – Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe/Getty Images

ActBlue, a fundraising juggernaut for liberal candidates and causes, is facing stepped-up scrutiny and criticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill and allies of President Donald Trump – as the GOP flexes its new power in Washington and targets one of the key pillars of the Democratic Party’s financial infrastructure.

Three Republicans in Congress – including the chairmen of the House Oversight and Administration panels – are urging Trump’s Treasury Department to share with lawmakers reports of suspicious financial transactions related to ActBlue. Other GOP lawmakers are demanding probes by Treasury and the FBI into whether the fundraising platform has helped organizations engaged in terrorism or violated federal campaign finance laws.

And billionaire Trump donor Elon Musk – who is overseeing the administration’s controversial effort to rapidly shrink the federal government – has criticized ActBlue, seeking to tie it to protests and acts of vandalism against his electric-vehicle company Tesla. He has argued, without evidence to substantiate his claims, that some prominent Democrats – including one who died in 2019 – were funding ActBlue and the protests.

“Something stinks about ActBlue,” Musk posted earlier this month on his social media platform, X.

Officials with ActBlue deny any wrongdoing.

“ActBlue has always dealt with attacks and baseless claims from the Right that are designed to undermine the power of the small-dollar donors who rely on our platform,” spokesperson Megan Hughes said in a statement in CNN. “This new, coordinated attack is different only in scale, and our team remains steadfast in defending against these bad-faith attacks.”

She said the platform would continue its “mission to expand access to political giving and ensure people-powered movements continue to thrive.”

ActBlue, a nonprofit organization, is a fundraising powerhouse for Democrats and progressive groups – helping to funnel small-dollar donations to candidates, party committees and others. In all, it has collected more than $16 billion since its founding in 2004, according to a running tally on its website.

Although it has competitors, it has long dominated processing payments online for the party. According to the platform, more than 14 million users have saved their contact and payment information with the group, allowing contributors to easily make one-click donations.

But the ramped-up criticism from Republicans comes as ActBlue has faced internal tumult – including the recent departure of several high-level staffers as first reported by The New York Times – and criticism from some Democratic consultants and others in liberal circles over whether the platform is doing enough to protect donors from deceptive tactics.

Last December, for instance, dozens of individuals and progressive groups signed an open letter to ActBlue, urging reforms – including prohibiting political committees that raise money on the platform from using misleading language in fundraising solicitations.

But some Democrats worry that – with Republicans now controlling all the levers of government in Washington – the increased scrutiny could serve as a precursor to a Republican attempt to shut down the platform entirely and undermine Democratic fundraising in future elections.

Josh Nelson, the CEO of the ad platform Civic Shout and one of the signatories of last year’s letter recommending changes to ActBlue’s policies, said his concerns about its internal practices have taken a back seat this year to his growing alarm over what he views as “illegitimate attacks” from the GOP.

“I think Republicans know that ActBlue has been an extremely effective fundraising platform for thousands of Democratic campaigns and progressive groups,” Nelson said. “They’re just trying to use power to harm their political opponents in future elections.”

“The question is how far will Republicans go?”

GOP lawmakers in recent years have increased their scrutiny of ActBlue, questioning how it guards against fraud and prevents foreigners from illegally contributing to US campaigns. Among the issues raised: ActBlue did not always require donors to add the CVV number – or card verification value – on every credit card transaction.

(ActBlue has added the CVV requirement but has said it has long used several reliable means to prevent fraud and prohibit illicit foreign contributions, including an address verification system to ensure cardholder addresses match those at the banks that issued the cards. Americans living abroad, for instance, also must include a copy of their passport photo.)

But this month has seen a slew of fresh ActBlue activity from GOP lawmakers, who are seeking executive branch probes or access to sensitive documents from Treasury, such as the “suspicious activity reports” or SARs, which financial institutions file with the agency to flag suspected cases of money laundering, fraud or other suspicious transactions.

Wisconsin GOP Rep. Bryan Steil, who oversees the House Administration Committee, and others have complained that the Biden administration provided only limited information in response to requests for the reports involving ActBlue.

He recently joined House Oversight and Accountability Committee chairman, Kentucky Rep. James Comer, and New York Rep. Nick Langworthy in a letter that seeks all suspicious activity reports mentioning ActBlue filed at any point from January 1, 2023.

It’s not clear whether Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will cooperate.

Currently, the House Administration Committee “is in communication with the Treasury Department about reviewing SARs,” a source familiar told CNN this week. A Treasury spokesperson did not comment.

Other GOP lawmakers pushing for probes of the fundraising platform include Trump allies, California Rep. Darrell Issa and Arizona Rep. Andy Biggs.

In the meantime, Democrats are trying to use the GOP scrutiny to bring in more political contributions.

“Republicans are attacking ActBlue because small-dollar donations from people like you are a major advantage for Democratic campaigns up-and-down the ballot,” read a recent fundraising email from the Democratic National Committee.

The appeal then links users to ActBlue to help Democrats “fight back.”

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Elon Musk has a dodgy plan to gut Social Security and please billionaires

USA Today

Elon Musk has a dodgy plan to gut Social Security and please billionaires | Opinion

EJ Montini, Arizona Republic – March 27, 2025

America’s co-president Elon Musk has referred to Social Security as “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”

The leader of the Department of Government Efficiency told Fox Business, “Most of the federal spending is entitlements. That’s the big one to eliminate.”

Musk and his helper Donald Trump want to gut the system. After all, billionaires have no need for Social Security.

However, they know that if they tried a direct approach and simply slashed Social Security benefits, even their most ardent sycophants in Congress would balk, knowing they’d be booted from office in the next election.

DOGE cuts make it tough to access Social Security benefits
White House Senior Advisor, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk attends a cabinet meeting held by U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on March 24, 2025 in Washington, DC.
White House Senior Advisor, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk attends a cabinet meeting held by U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on March 24, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Instead of drastically cutting benefits, the plan seemingly is to make it more and more difficult for people who have earned those benefits to get them.Advertisement

That’s why Musk and his DOGE bros want to cut thousands of jobs from Social Security’s workforce, close regional offices and limit phone service by “requiring recipients to show up in person to verify certain changes to their accounts,” according to The Washington Post.

Opinion: Trump turns Republicans into liars and enablers. Will they ever admit the truth?

As a result, The Post reported, “the Social Security Administration website crashed four times in 10 days this month because the servers were overloaded, blocking millions of retirees and disabled Americans from logging in to their online accounts.”

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., succinctly outlined the plot to gut Social Security at a hearing in Washington, D.C.

Not just retirees rely on Social Security

She said, “DOGE is considering slashing up to 50% of the Social Security Administration’s workforce. That means longer lines, more errors, and for everyone who gives up or who dies before they get their benefits sorted out, those delays and errors also turn into benefit cuts.”

Warren added, “The law is to deliver the benefits that people are legally entitled to. If you don’t have the staff. If you don’t answer the phones. If you don’t fix the mistakes. People don’t get what they’re legally entitled to.”

Opinion: Trump has signed more than 100 executive orders already. Is that too many? Tell us.

The list of people who will be most at risk includes retirees, of course. But also individuals with disabilities, patients in hospitals, people who live in remote areas, even children, many living in foster homes.

It goes on.

Long lines, confusion and delay hurt us all

Already, legitimate Social Security recipients are feeling it. Very long wait times for callers. Confusion. Uncertainty.Advertisement

Delays in receiving Social Security benefits can be catastrophic for some recipients. Many people rely on the money to help take care of their most basic needs.

A survey published in January found that, without their benefits, 42% of Americans 65 and older reported, “I would not be able to afford the basics, such as food, clothing, or housing.”

Former Social Security Administration Commissioner Martin O’Malley said recently at a briefing, “I can tell you that democracy is waking up to this very, very real threat that they are coming for Social Security.”

Coming?

I believe they’re already here.

More in Politics
HuffPost: Critics Bring Receipts After Musk Claims They ‘Can’t Point To Any’ Controversial DOGE Cuts
Exactly: ‘Something stinks’: Elon Musk, congressional Republicans target Democrats’ main fundraising machine