Public skeptical of the president who cried exoneration

MSNBC

The Rachel Maddow Show / The MaddowBlog

Public skeptical of the president who cried exoneration

By Steve Benen             April 1, 2019

Image: US-POLITCS-FBI-MULLER
Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI)Director Robert Mueller testifies during a hearing of the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Commerce, Justice, Science,…    Brendan Smialowski

 

Most have probably heard the story of the boy who cried wolf. The moral of the story applies nicely to the president who cried exoneration.

Donald Trump has spent the last several months lying about being exonerated in the Russia scandal. It happened, by my count, at least six times in response to separate and unrelated developments, each of which did not absolve the president, his bogus claims to the contrary notwithstanding.

With this in mind, it felt familiar last week when Trump said Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in a report the president has neither seen nor read, had “totally” exonerated him, specifically on the question of obstruction of justice, despite Mueller writing that his report “does not exonerate” the president. The Associated Press explained this morning, “President Donald Trump is taking his interpretation of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation well beyond the facts.”

Why lie, repeatedly, about being absolved? It’s likely that Trump hoped to deceive the public so that he could try to reap some political and electoral rewards. The trouble is, the president who cried exoneration a few too many times clearly has a credibility problem.

Even as the White House claims vindication from the summary of special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings in the Russia probe, the American public does not see a clear verdict about whether President Donald Trump has been cleared of wrongdoing.

According to a new NBC News/ Wall Street Journal poll, 29 percent of Americans say they believe Trump has been cleared of wrongdoing, based on what they have heard about Mueller’s findings, while 40 percent say they do not believe he has been cleared.

Similarly, the latest Washington Post poll asked respondents, “Mueller’s report states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him’ of obstructing justice. Trump said the report was a ‘complete exoneration.’ Who do you believe more – Trump or Mueller?”

Only 32% sided with the president.

There’s also the latest NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll, released late last week, which pointed in the same direction: “Almost six in 10 (56 percent) said that questions still exist, with just 36 percent saying Trump is clear of any wrongdoing.”

It’s possible more Americans would see this story the way the White House has told them to if the president were more trustworthy. It’s also possible the American mainstream is resisting the rush to judgment and wants to see the Mueller report before drawing conclusions about its contents.

Whatever the cause, if Trump assumed the public would accept his spin at face value, he’s probably disappointed that more people expect to see some proof before embracing White House talking points.

White House makes a health care promise it can’t keep

MSNBC

The Rachel Maddow Show – The MaddowBlog

White House makes a health care promise it can’t keep

By Steve Benen             April 1, 2019

A doctor measures the blood pressure of a patient. (Photo by Carsten Koall/Getty)
A doctor measures the blood pressure of a patient. Photo by Carsten Koall/Getty

 

In the debate over health care policy, Donald Trump and his team have already left a long trail of broken promises, but the White House nevertheless continues to make commitments it will never be able to keep.

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday that if the Trump administration succeeds in striking down the entirety of the Affordable Care Act in court, he can guarantee every person who has health coverage because of the Obama-era health law will not lose their coverage.

On “This Week,” ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl asked Mulvaney whether he could provide such a guarantee for the millions of people who enrolled through HealthCare.gov, including those with pre-existing conditions and the people under the age of 26 enrolled under their parents’ plans.

“Yes and here’s why,” Mulvaney said Sunday. “Let’s talk about pre-existing conditions, because it gets a lot of the attention and rightly so. Every single plan that this White House has ever put forward since Donald Trump was elected, covered pre-existing conditions.”

The list of problems with this isn’t short. If the president’s scheme succeeds and the courts tear down the Affordable Care Act in its entirety, millions of families will lose their coverage. It’s an unambiguous fact. To hear the acting White House chief of staff tell it, none of those people should worry, however, because those Americans would maintain coverage in a post-ACA landscape.

No one should take this seriously – because there is no Plan B. Mulvaney boasted, for example, “Every single plan that this White House has ever put forward since Donald Trump was elected, covered pre-existing conditions.” That might be reassuring if (a) the White House had ever put forward a health care plan of its own; and (b) the White House hadn’t endorsed a variety of proposals from congressional Republicans that would’ve gutted protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions.

But stepping to look at all of this in the larger context, the root of the problem remains unchanged: GOP policymakers have spent a decade trying to craft an alternative to “Obamacare,” and they’ve failed repeatedly.

Trump and his Republican brethren seem to think this time will be different. They’re wrong – and it’s important to understand why.

On the surface, GOP officials are offering familiar rhetoric, repeated periodically since 2009, that the party’s blueprint is well on its way and will be available sometime soon. “There is a plan,” Kellyanne Conway told Fox News yesterday, adding that the Republican blueprint is “manifold.”

Reality, however, keeps getting in the way. As the Washington Post reported over the weekend, not only do Republicans not have a plan, “there are no plans to make such a plan.”

What about the Senate working group the president pointed to the other day? It now appears the group may not actually exist. Capitol Hill is looking to the White House to lead, the White House is looking to Capitol Hill to lead, and the result is a comedy of errors.

Stepping back, however, there’s a larger point that’s often overlooked. It’s easy to ridicule Republicans over their broken promises, bogus boasts, and imaginary plans, but the fact remains that there is no compelling GOP alternative to the Affordable Care Act because it’s an unobtainable goal.

Bloomberg News had a good report last week that noted in passing, “The problem for GOP lawmakers is the paucity of free-market policy ideas for health care that are politically popular.”

It’s an important detail. For 10 years, Republicans have tried to come up with a health care plan – which voters would actually like – that would bring coverage to millions and protect Americans with pre-existing conditions, without extensive regulation of private insurers, spending a lot of money, raising taxes, or increasing the deficit.

They’ve failed, not simply as a matter of governance, but also as a matter of logic. GOP officials are effectively trying to create a square circle. It can’t be done. It won’t be done.

Republicans are constrained in ways Democrats are not. When Dems began work on the Affordable Care Act, they set out to solve a problem. When GOP policymakers tried to address the same challenge, they set out to solve a problem in an ideologically satisfying way that honored conservative principles about taxes, regulation, and the size of government.

Those self-imposed limits necessarily made their task impossible. After a decade of Republican effort, nothing has happened because nothing can happen.

If GOP officials were sincere about coming up with a model that might meet muster, it would look an awful lot like the Affordable Care Act – which, despite a decade of hysteria, is already the centrist model based entirely on bipartisan principles.

Postscript: There are some reports this morning that Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah)) is in “preliminary discussions” about coming up with an ACA replacement plan for his party. Since Romney helped create the first-ever statewide coverage plan, that might seem like a sensible strategy.

The trouble, however, is that Romney’s model served as the basis for “Obamacare,” which Republicans have convinced themselves is unacceptable.

Medicare for All is a good deal for American business!

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and Business Leaders for Medicare for All

March 30, 2019

Watch Business Leaders for Medicare for All Chairman Richard Master, CEO of a $200 million a year company, explain why Medicare for All is such a good deal for American business.

Medicare For All Is Good For Business

This CEO of a $200 million a year company wants the business community to know: Medicare for all is good for business.

Posted by U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders on Wednesday, March 27, 2019

An emotional plea for a woman’s right to choose

NowThis Politics

March 30, 2019

‘I’ve been pregnant 10 times. But I have only given birth twice.’

‘I have seen what many of you in here have called a heartbeat 10 times.’ — This lawmaker made an emotional plea for a woman’s right to choose by sharing her own emotional journey with pregnancy

Georgia State Senator Shares Personal Struggles with Pregnancy in Emotional Plea Against Severe Abortion Ban

'I have seen what many of you in here have called a heartbeat 10 times.' — This lawmaker made an emotional plea for a woman’s right to choose by sharing her own emotional journey with pregnancy

Posted by NowThis Election on Friday, March 29, 2019

Secrets of the world’s blue zones; places where people grow older and stay healthier.

EcoWatch
March 31, 2019

There are 5 Blue Zones in the world; places where people grow older and stay healthier than in any other place.

The secrets of the world's blue zones: how to grow old, healthy

There are 5 Blue Zones in the world; places where people grow older and stay healthier than in any other place.👵🏽 👴🏽BrightVibes

Posted by EcoWatch on Monday, March 25, 2019

No surprise: Trump appointee does not understand the basics of consumer protection

NowThis Politics

March 31, 2019

This rep exposed a Trump appointee for not understanding the basics of consumer protection.

This rep whipped out the textbook she wrote to school a Trump official on the basics of consumer protection and the dangers of payday loans.

Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) Uses Her Own Textbook to School Director of the CFPB on The Basics

This rep whipped out the textbook she wrote to school a Trump official on the basics of consumer protection and dangers of payday loans

Posted by NowThis Election on Friday, March 29, 2019

Why the sharing economy hurts workers!

Robert Reich
March 31, 2019
Corporations are trying to kill protections for workers in the gig economy. It’s estimated that soon over 40 percent of the American labor force will be in such temporary or contract work. Here’s what we must do to ensure their rights are protected.

Why the Sharing Economy Hurts Workers

Corporations are trying to kill protections for workers in the gig economy. It’s estimated that soon over 40 percent of the American labor force will be in such temporary or contract work. Here's what we must do to ensure their rights are protected.

Posted by Robert Reich on Sunday, March 31, 2019

India wants to use flesh eating turtles to rid the Ganges of decomposing bodies.

Vice News posted an episode of Vice News Tonight.

March 31, 2019

“The situation is worsening, and in the last 24 years I have seen no improvement at all.”

India wants to use flesh eating turtles to rid the Ganges of decomposing bodies.

India Wants to Use Flesh Eating Turtles to Rid the Ganges of Decomposing Bodies

“The situation is worsening, and in the last 24 years I have seen no improvement at all.”India wants to use flesh eating turtles to rid the Ganges of decomposing bodies.

Posted by VICE News on Friday, March 29, 2019

What are the Koch brothers hiding?

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders

March 31, 2019

The Koch-brothers funded Mercatus Center might not like that their report revealed Medicare for all will save Americans $2 trillion. But numbers don’t lie.

What the Koch Brothers Are Hiding

The Koch-brothers funded Mercatus Center might not like that their report revealed Medicare for all will save Americans $2 trillion. But numbers don't lie.

Posted by U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders on Saturday, March 30, 2019