Medicaid cuts: How many millions could your Monmouth or Ocean County hospital lose?

App.com Asbury Park Press

Medicaid cuts: How many millions could your Monmouth or Ocean County hospital lose?

Michael L. Diamond, Asbury Park Press – March 3, 2025

LONG BRANCH — The Jersey Shore’s health care providers could see millions of dollars in cuts — and thousands of its residents could lose insurance coverage — under a plan by Republican lawmakers to scale back Medicaid, U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone and advocates argued Friday.

The proposed cuts of at least $880 billion nationwide over the next decade would ripple through the Shore’s hospitals, nursing homes and home health programs — just as the giant baby boomer population continues to retire and is expected to need more care, they said.

“This is simply unacceptable,” Pallone said. “We can’t have this level of cuts.”

Pallone, speaking Friday at a press conference at the Long Branch Senior Center, is the ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid.

The U.S. House of Representatives last week narrowly passed a budget resolution that called for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over the next 10 years and directed Pallone’s committee to make billions of cuts to partially offset them.

President Donald Trump has ruled out cuts to Social Security and Medicare, leaving policymakers few places to turn for savings other than Medicaid.

It shines a spotlight on a program that in New Jersey is known as NJ Family Care, which provides health insurance for 1.8 million New Jerseyans, or 18% of the population. They include: low- and moderate-income adults and children; people with disabilities; and seniors in long-term care facilities.

Ocean County has the state’s second-highest Medicaid population, with 168,437 adults and children covered by the program. Monmouth County has 83,117 Medicaid recipients, according to state data.

U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., holds as a news conference at the Long Branch Senior Center in Long Branch to call attention to the impact of potential cuts to Medicaid. Friday, February 28, 2025.
U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., holds as a news conference at the Long Branch Senior Center in Long Branch to call attention to the impact of potential cuts to Medicaid. Friday, February 28, 2025.

Dr. Kate Aberger, medical director for Visiting Physician Services at VNA Health Group, said Medicaid has been invaluable. The program covers more than half of New Jerseyans who are in long-term care facilities. And it pays for medicine, equipment and home health care aides for the aging population.

“Medicaid makes it possible to deliver this high-quality health care to patients in their homes, helping them manage their chronic conditions, avoid hospitalization and maintain their independence,” Aberger said. “Without this funding, many would have no choice but to enter a nursing home or go without care altogether.”

Dr. Kate Aberger, medical director of Visiting Physician Services, Parker Advanced Care Institute, of VNA Health Group speaks at a news conference at the Long Branch Senior Center in Long Branch to call attention to the impact of potential cuts to Medicaid. Friday, February 28, 2025.
Dr. Kate Aberger, medical director of Visiting Physician Services, Parker Advanced Care Institute, of VNA Health Group speaks at a news conference at the Long Branch Senior Center in Long Branch to call attention to the impact of potential cuts to Medicaid. Friday, February 28, 2025.More

Signed into law 60 years ago by President Lyndon B. Johnson, Medicaid is funded by both the federal and state governments. The program in New Jersey has a $24 billion budget this fiscal year, with $14 billion coming from the federal government and $10 billion coming from the state’s $56.6 billion budget.

Republican lawmakers have said they can reach the savings they need by stamping out waste, fraud and abuse and adding a requirement that recipients work. In 2023, Medicaid fraud units secured more than 1,100 convictions and recovered $1.2 billion, according to a Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General report issued last MarchUSA TODAY reported.

U.S. Rep. Chris Smith, a Republican whose district includes parts of Monmouth and Ocean counties, voted for the House budget resolution, which essentially set out a blueprint for the mix of tax and spending cuts, but leaving it to committees to hash out the details. He didn’t respond to requests for an interview.

Smith bucked his party in 2017 when he voted against its bid to repeal the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. He cited the $880 billion in proposed cuts to Medicaid that would hurt people with disabilities — a group he has been known to support during his career.

Democrats and health care advocates, however, said the GOP’s new plan calls for extending tax cuts that largely benefit the wealthy and partially offsetting them with cuts to a health care program that benefits lower-income Americans. Among the options: reduce federal matching grants, and restrict eligibility.

Health providers worry that the state couldn’t make up for losses in federal funding, leaving hospitals, for example, facing steep cuts. The New Jersey Department of Health and Human Services said Monmouth and Ocean County hospitals could lose a total of $104.7 million to $332.3 million, depending on the scenario.

(Scroll down to see the potential impact on each hospital).

It isn’t clear what percentage of overall revenue is at risk. But the New Jersey Hospital Association, a trade group, said one in four patients in the state are covered by Medicaid.

“The proposed Medicaid cuts would have a catastrophic impact not only on New Jersey families, but for the hospitals and long term care residences that we all count on,” Cathy Bennett, president and chief executive officer of the New Jersey Hospital Association, said in a statement.

Potential Medicaid cuts to Monmouth and Ocean county hospitals
  • Bayshore Community Hospital, Holmdel: $5.2 million to $16.4 million
  • CentraState Medical Center, Freehold Township: $6.7 million to $21.3 million
  • Community Medical Center, Toms River: $13.8 million to $43.7 million
  • Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune: $27.6 million to $87.5 million
  • Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch: $22.3 million to $70.9 million
  • Monmouth Medical Center Southern Campus, Lakewood: $8.3 million to $26.5 million
  • Ocean University Medical Center, Brick: $9.2 million to $29.3 million
  • Riverview Medical Center, Red Bank: $5.6 million to $17.7 million
  • Southern Ocean County Medical Center, Stafford: $6 million to $19 million

Source: New Jersey Department of Health and Human Services

Staff writer Scott Fallon contributed to this story.

Michael L. Diamond is a business reporter at the Asbury Park Press. He has been writing about the New Jersey economy and health care industry since 1999.

Who does Medicaid cover? How Congress’ proposed budget cuts could be felt

NBC News

Who does Medicaid cover? How Congress’ proposed budget cuts could be felt

Berkeley Lovelace Jr. – March 2, 2025

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 25, 2025. (Andrew Harnik / Getty Images file)
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said on CNN that lawmakers were going to cut “fraud, waste and abuse” out of the Medicaid program.

budget resolution adopted Tuesday by House Republicans could jeopardize the health insurance coverage of millions of low-income and disabled people who rely on Medicaid if lawmakers follow through with their proposed spending cuts, experts warn.

The budget plan instructs the Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, to identify at least $880 billion in mandatory spending cuts over the next 10 years. The savings are expected to be used to extend President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, which are set to expire at the end of this year.

While the resolution doesn’t specifically mention Medicaid, experts say it would be unfeasible for Republicans to hit that target without significant cuts to the health program, since it’s one of the largest sources of federal spending, costing more than $600 billion per year, according to government data.

“The way the math would work is that those cuts would largely need to come out of Medicaid,” said Robin Rudowitz, director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured at KFF, a nonprofit group that focuses on health policy. “Medicare is off the table, and there just aren’t any other sources of funding for the Energy Commerce to look at.” (During his presidential campaign, Trump vowed to preserve Medicare.)

The possible cuts are expected to extend beyond those who benefited from the 2014 Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, potentially affecting nearly all of the people in the program.

“Everyone who relies on Medicaid would be at risk,” said Edwin Park, a research professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.  “Specifics of the proposal will matter — each state will be hit, and how hard they’ll be hit will vary — but certainly they’re all at risk.”

Who does Medicaid cover?

Medicaid provides health insurance primarily to people with low incomes, although it covers other groups including some older adults, pregnant women and people with disabilities. That includes about 72 million people.

In 2023, Medicaid covered nearly 4 in 10 children, including over 8 in 10 children in poverty, 1 in 6 adults, and almost half of adults in poverty, according to KFF. The program covers more than 1 in 4 adults with disabilities and provides coverage for 41% of all births in the U.S.

“There’s a sense that Medicare and Social Security are sort of these sacrosanct programs and Medicaid is often not lumped into the category,” said Allison Orris, the director of Medicaid policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a think tank. “Polling over the last few years shows that two- thirds of adults in the U.S. have some connection to Medicaid, and almost three- quarters of the population have a generally favorable view of the program. And that’s because Medicaid really touches people and provides health care at all stages of life.”

The program is jointly funded by states and the federal government. States cover the upfront cost of care and then are reimbursed by the federal government for at least 50%.

When the Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid to more people, the federal government committed to paying at least 90% of the total costs for the people who enrolled due to the expansion in each state.

The share of people on Medicaid varies by state, but the states with the highest number of enrollees include California, New Mexico, Arkansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, West Virginia and New York, according to KFF. The program covers nearly half of Puerto Rico residents, the largest share among states and territories. Only 10 states, including Florida and Texas, don’t participate in Medicaid’s expansion.

With fewer dollars coming from the federal government, states would bear a larger share of Medicaid costs, which many would likely struggle to afford, Orris said.

“Capping federal spending doesn’t make health care needs go away,” Orris said. “It just shifts the risk of higher spending to states and makes states make choices about: do they cut coverage, do they cut eligibility, do they cut provider rates?”

What about fraud in Medicaid?

The GOP House budget plan is only the first step in a series of negotiations between House and Senate lawmakers before a bill can reach Trump’s desk.

Republican leaders have argued that the proposed budget cuts would eliminate fraud in Medicaid, but Park, of Georgetown, said there’s no data to support the claim that fraud is more prevalent in Medicaid than in other parts of the health care system, including Medicare and private insurance.

On Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said on CNN that lawmakers were not going to make cuts to Medicaid benefits. “We’re going to take care of those who are rightful beneficiaries of the program,” Johnson said. “We’re going to cut the fraud, waste and abuse and that’s where we’re going to get the savings to accomplish this mission.”

Park said that’s misleading.

“The fraud argument is being used as a frame to justify Medicaid cuts, but the major proposals that are under consideration today to achieve this $880 billion target are the same major Medicaid cuts that were included in the [2017] Affordable Care Act repeal and replace bills that ultimately failed,” Park said. “Back then, there was no talk about combating fraud or waste or abuse.”

“Republicans are saying, ‘We’re not going to hurt enrollees, we’re not going to hurt people, we’re just going to deal with waste, fraud and abuse,’” Orris said. “But I think we need to unpack that and understand that just like any health care program, there are some improper payments in Medicaid, which generally result from paperwork not being filled out. That happens across all programs.”

The argument, experts say, shifts the focus away from the harms that would come to people across age and income spectrum if Medicaid gets cuts.

“Congress is very unlikely to say, ‘Dear states, you need to cut coverage for people with disabilities,’” Orris said. “All of those hard decisions are going to be left for states to make and it’s hard to say that any population would be spared, especially if you get into the realms of cuts that are big enough that lead to hospitals closing and impacting access to care.”

Without Medicaid coverage, people often don’t have any other options.

“Medicaid is such a complicated program, and it covers so many different facets of the health care system, many of which people don’t fully appreciate,” Rudowitz said. “We know that most people who lose Medicaid would likely become uninsured and then would still need health care services, and may still show up to clinics, and those providers would likely not be reimbursed.”

Sanders Eviscerates Musk for Calling Social Security a ‘Ponzi Scheme’

Daily Beast

Sanders Eviscerates Musk for Calling Social Security a ‘Ponzi Scheme’

Will Neal – March 3, 2025

Senator Bernie Sanders speaks with NBC's Kristen Welker on Meet the Press on March 2, 2025.
NBC / NBC

The nation’s second-oldest senator tore chunks out of Elon Musk after hearing how the world’s richest man thinks welfare payments for the elderly are basically just fraud.

NBC’s Kristen Welker was joined by veteran left-winger Bernie Sanders when the topic came up on Sunday’s broadcast of Meet the Press, with the host asking the Vermont senator what he thought of Musk describing Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” during a recent appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience.

Sanders, for his part, was having none of it. “What Musk, the wealthiest guy in the world, just said is totally outrageous,” the 83-year-old erupted. “That’s a hell of a Ponzi scheme when for the last 80 years, Social Security has paid out every nickel owed to every eligible American.”

The Tesla founder’s recent comments put him at odds with the position taken by President Donald Trump, who repeatedly assured elderly voters on last year’s campaign trail he had no desire whatsoever to interfere with Social Security payments.

During his interview with Rogan, Musk, who just welcomed his 14th known child, also lamented that “people are living way longer than expected [while] there are fewer babies being born,” suggesting that an aging U.S. population has threatened to create an unmanageable financial burden for the federal government in future.

Visibly seething at the SpaceX CEO’s perceived hypocrisy, Sanders went on to dismantle Musk’s argument by pointing out that support for senior U.S. citizens would potentially only prove unmanageable if the state was opposed to actually tapping all available financial resources.

“Right now, Musk, worth $400 billion, contributes the same amount into the Social Security trust fund as somebody making $170 million,” he said, proposing that a lift to taxable thresholds for the nation’s wealthiest would enable the government to “extend the solvency of Social Security for 75 years.”

CNN Poll: Public remains negative on Trump ahead of address to Congress

CNN

CNN Poll: Public remains negative on Trump ahead of address to Congress

Jennifer Agiesta, CNN – March 2, 2025

CNN Poll: Public remains negative on Trump ahead of address to Congress

The American public’s view of Donald Trump’s presidency and the direction he’s leading the country is more negative than positive just ahead of his first formal address to Congress since returning to office, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.

The survey finds that across three basic measures of Trump’s performance on the job – his approval rating, whether he has the right priorities and whether his policies are taking the country in the right direction – the negative side outpaces the positive.

Overall, 52% disapprove of Trump’s performance in office, with 48% approving, about the same as in a CNN poll in mid-February. The poll was completed before Friday’s angry exchange in the Oval Office between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and does not reflect public opinion on that event.

Trump continues to be broadly popular with Republicans (90% of whom approve of his handling of the job) and unpopular among Democrats (90% disapprove), while disapproval among independents is approaching 6 in 10: 41% approve and 59% disapprove. Earlier in February, a similar 43% of independents approved and 56% disapproved.

Trump’s 48% approval rating ahead of his initial address to Congress is higher than it was in 2017 before that year’s speech at the Capitol. Trump’s appearances before Congress during his first term did little to move the needle on his approval rating: None of his four speeches resulted in a change to his approval rating of more than 3 percentage points. Trump will be addressing a country that is largely greeting his policy proposals with skepticism. More Americans see Trump’s policy proposals as taking the country in the wrong direction (45%) than the right one (39%), with 15% expressing no opinion on the question. In early March of 2017, just after that first-term initial address to Congress, Americans split about evenly over whether Trump’s policies would lead the right way or the wrong one, but by the following January, they said by a 12-point margin that his policies were pointing the nation in the wrong direction.

A majority also say Trump has not paid enough attention to the country’s most important problems (52% feel that way), with 40% saying he has had the right priorities and another 8% unsure. Doubts about the president’s priorities extend to a small but notable share of those who express support for the president on other measures in the poll: 12% of those who approve of the way Trump has handled the presidency and 9% of those who say his policies move the country in the right direction say his priorities haven’t yet been in the right place. And among his own partisans, 18% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say he hasn’t yet focused on the most important issues. Fewer than 1 in 10 who align with the Democratic Party see him as focused on the right things.

Demographic trends in views of the president have largely held steady since earlier in the month. Overall, Trump’s approval rating remains deeply underwater among younger adults (41% of those ages 18 to 34 approve), Hispanic adults (41% approve) and Black adults (28% approve). Women break sharply negative (57% disapprove to 42% approve), while men generally approve (54% approve to 46% disapprove). Trump maintains an approval rating north of 60% among Whites without college degrees (61% approve).

Younger Americans are among those most likely to see Trump as taking the country the wrong way: 51% of those age 18 to 34 feel that way vs. 31% who say he’s taking it in the right direction, and 61% in this group say he hasn’t paid enough attention to the country’s most pressing problems. Just 14% of Black adults and 31% of Hispanic adults see Trump’s policies as going in the right direction, with roughly two-thirds or more in each group saying Trump’s priorities are off (69% among Black adults, 64% among Hispanics). Independents also break negative on Trump’s policies and are 20 points more likely to say Trump is taking the country down the wrong path than the right one.

Opinions of his policies among these groups, though, remain less than fully settled. Roughly one-quarter of independents currently say they don’t have an opinion on how Trump’s proposals will affect the nation, as do 21% of Americans of color and 18% of those younger than 45.

The CNN Poll was conducted by SSRS from February 24-28 among a random national sample of 2,212 adults drawn from a probability-based panel. Surveys were either conducted online or by telephone with a live interviewer. Results among the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.4 percentage points.

CNN’s Ariel Edwards-Levy and Edward Wu contributed to this report.

More in Politics
Fox News: Trump should ‘stew in his own juice’ during congressional address, Pelosi advises Dems
HuffPost: Jasmine Crockett Sums Up GOP Lawmakers In 1 Damning Word Regarding Trump And Musk

GOP Sen. James Lankford defends Zelenskyy as Trump officials question his leadership

NBC News

GOP Sen. James Lankford defends Zelenskyy as Trump officials question his leadership

Megan Lebowitz – March 2, 2025

Sen. Lankford: ‘I don’t agree’ with calls for Zelenskyy to resign

Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., said Sunday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is “rightfully concerned” about Russia reneging on agreements, as some Trump administration officials took to the airwaves to criticize the leader of the longtime U.S. ally.

“I understand Zelenskyy is rightfully concerned that Putin has violated every single agreement he’s ever signed and that he can’t be trusted,” Lankford said in an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

His comments come after an explosive exchange in the Oval Office between President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Zelenskyy, in which the U.S. leaders berated the Ukrainian president for his approach to diplomacy and argued that he didn’t sufficiently thank the U.S. for its support, despite Zelenskyy having thanked the U.S. numerous times. Current and former Russian officials praised Trump after the confrontation.

Zelenskyy pointed out during the Oval Office exchange that Russia has previously broken ceasefires, adding that Russian President Vladimir Putin “killed our people and he didn’t exchange prisoners.”

Asked Sunday about Putin’s not keeping previous agreements, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told ABC News’ “This Week” anchor George Stephanopoulos that “moving forward is the question, not the past,” before adding that the United States wanted to engage Russia in negotiations.

Lankford was asked on “Meet the Press” whether he was concerned that the United States was turning its back on Ukraine, a longtime ally. Lankford said “no.”

“No, we’re not turning our back on Ukraine, nor should we,” he said. “Putin is a murderous KGB thug that murders his political enemies and is a dictator.”

The Trump administration has ushered in a new chapter of foreign relations. The president has falsely called Zelenskyy a dictator and cast blame on Ukraine for the start of the war, which began when Russia invaded its democratic neighbor in 2022. In February, the administration sided with Russia in a vote on a United Nations resolution that called for Russia’s withdrawal from Ukraine.

U.S. officials have discussed whether to pause military aid to Ukraine after the Oval Office confrontation, according to two administration officials.

Lankford also defended Trump during the interview, saying the president “is trying to get both sides to the table.” He added that both countries needed to work toward a resolution to the war.

“We need to get these two folks at the table, get to some kind of resolution, to something that may look like North and South Korea for a long time and have a line where people are looking at each other but not an active war,” he said.

Trump administration officials criticize Zelenskyy

Trump said Friday that Zelenskyy has “got to say I want to make peace,” and several of the president’s allies have suggested Zelenskyy should resign, marking a rare public push by top U.S. officials for the end of a long-standing U.S. ally’s leadership.

Trump administration officials fanned out across Sunday news shows to criticize Zelenskyy and cast doubt on his ability to participate in a U.S.-led peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Criticism of Putin, a U.S. adversary, took a back seat.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said in a video recorded Wednesday that the Trump administration is “rapidly changing … all foreign policy configurations,” according to a Reuters translation.

“This largely coincides with our vision,” Peskov added in the video, which was published Sunday.

In an interview on ABC News’ “This Week,” Rubio accused Zelenskyy of disrupting a push for parties to come to a negotiating table. He went on, arguing that Zelenskyy “found every opportunity to try to Ukraine-splain on every issue” and criticizing his comments with Vance.

National security adviser Mike Waltz said Sunday on CNN that “we need a leader that can deal with us, eventually deal with the Russians and end this war.”

“If it becomes apparent that President Zelenskyy’s either personal motivations or political motivations are divergent from ending the fighting in his country, then I think we have a real issue on our hands,” Waltz said. He added that ending the war would take concessions on both sides, including on territory and security guarantees.

Separately, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Fox News that Zelenskyy’s requests of the United States, including requests for security guarantees, were “ridiculous.”

“Zelenskyy needed to hear it directly from the funding mouth of the United States of America: We’re not going to give you money unless you’re here for peace,” Lutnick said.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Fox News that “Trump recognizes the urgent need to end this war,” adding that “Zelenskyy has different aims in mind.”

“He has said that he wants to end this war, but he will only accept an end, apparently, that leads to what he views as Ukraine’s victory,” Gabbard added. “Even if it comes at an incredibly high cost of potentially World War III or even a nuclear war.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., had initially suggested that Zelenskyy step aside, saying after the Oval Office meeting that the Ukrainian president “either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with, or he needs to change.”

Lankford rejected GOP suggestions for Zelenskyy to resign, saying Sunday that he thinks “that would spiral Ukraine into chaos right now, trying to find who is the negotiator to bring an issue to peace.”

A handful of Republicans in Congress have objected to the United States’ foreign policy realignment, though most have remained mum or echoed the Trump administration’s perspective.

Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, said he was “deeply troubled” by the United States’ United Nations vote, and Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., said after the vote that the “Trump Administration royally screwed up today on Ukraine.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, slammed the administration’s perspective on Saturday, saying she was “sick to my stomach as the administration appears to be walking away from our allies and embracing Putin, a threat to democracy and U.S. values around the world.”

Waltz on Sunday cast doubt as to whether the administration could negotiate an end to the war.

“I don’t know that we can get both sides to the table at this point,” he said on CNN.

Trump had previously said he could end the war in Ukraine in one day, or even before taking office.

More in Politics
HuffPost: Trump Social Security Commissioner Suggests Anger At Janet Mills Contributed To Contract Cancellations
Daily Beast: Stephen Miller Loses His Cool on Fox News: ‘Absolute Moron’
HuffPost: ‘Shocking, Insulting’: Karoline Leavitt’s France Remark Stuns Critics

Today marks the 3-year anniversary of the Ukraine-Russia war. Here’s the latest

Live Now

Today marks the 3-year anniversary of the Ukraine-Russia war. Here’s the latest

Daniel Miller – February 24, 2025

Monday marks the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as leaders from Europe and Canada visited Ukraine’s capital.

Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 and as negotiations continue for a resolution to end the war, here’s what you need to know.

US abstains from voting on resolution

In the U.N. General Assembly, the U.S. joined Russia in voting against a Europe-backed Ukrainian resolution that called out Moscow’s aggression and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops.

The U.S. then abstained from voting on its own competing resolution after Europeans, led by France, succeeded in amending it to make clear Russia was the aggressor. The voting was taking place on the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion and as Trump was hosting French President Emmanuel Macron in Washington.

It was a major setback for the Trump administration in the 193-member world body, whose resolutions are not legally binding but are seen as a barometer of world opinion.

Also on Monday, the president expressed hope that Russia’s war in Ukraine would near an endgame after he met with Macron.

“It looks like we’re getting very close,” Trump told reporters of the minerals deal before his meeting with Macron. He said Zelenskyy could potentially visit Washington this week or next to sign it.

<div>U.S. President Donald Trump (R) and French President Emmanuel Macron hold a joint news conference following a meeting at the White House on Feb. 24, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)</div>
U.S. President Donald Trump (R) and French President Emmanuel Macron hold a joint news conference following a meeting at the White House on Feb. 24, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)More
Trump, Macron press conference

Local perspective

President Donald Trump met with French President Emmanuel Macron at the White House for talks on Monday with Trump adjusting American foreign policy as he attempts to end Russia’s war in Ukraine.

What they’re saying

The pair spoke at a joint press conference Monday afternoon.

Macron said their talks were productive and acknowledged that European nations must do more to bolster defense on the continent. But Macron also warned against capitulating to Russia.

″This peace must not mean a surrender of Ukraine,” Macron said. “It must not mean a ceasefire without guarantees. This peace must allow for Ukrainian sovereignty.”

Earlier, in broad-ranging comments, Trump said he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin would accept European peacekeepers in Ukraine to keep the peace.

UN votes on dueling Russia-Ukraine resolutions

In a win for Ukraine, the United States failed to get the U.N. General Assembly to approve its resolution urging an end to the war without mentioning Moscow’s aggression.

Dig deeper

This marks a setback for the Trump administration in the 193-member world body, whose resolutions are not legally binding but are seen as a barometer of world opinion. But it also shows some diminished support for Ukraine, whose resolution passed 93-18, with 65 abstentions. That’s lower than previous votes, which saw over 140 nations condemn Russia’s aggression.

The Russia-Ukraine war
<div>A ceremony is held at the Lychakiv Cemetery to honor the memory of fallen soldiers on the 3nd anniversary of the Russian-Ukrainian war, marking three years since the conflict began, on February 24, 2025, in Lviv, Ukraine. (Photo by Michael Sorrow/Anadolu via Getty Images)</div>
A ceremony is held at the Lychakiv Cemetery to honor the memory of fallen soldiers on the 3nd anniversary of the Russian-Ukrainian war, marking three years since the conflict began, on February 24, 2025, in Lviv, Ukraine. (Photo by Michael Sorrow/Anadolu via Getty Images)More

The backstory

Russian President Vladimir Putin sent troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, amid Kyiv’s bid to join NATO, which he cast as a major threat to Russia. He asked for NATO’s guarantee that it would never offer membership to Ukraine.

Putin expected a quick victory but was met by steadfast Ukrainian resistance and a flow of Western weapons. As of negotiations, Russia controls about a fifth of the Ukrainian territory.

Russia-Ukraine ceasefire

What we know

Russian President Vladimir Putin has demanded that Ukraine withdraw its troops from the four regions that Russia has seized but never fully controlled, renounce its bid to join NATO and protect the rights of Russian speakers.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has previously rejected these demands.

What we don’t know

Details of the ceasefire proposal weren’t immediately available.

Moreover, it’s also unclear how involved Zelenskyy and other allies may have been in drafting the proposal. In pushing for a resolution, President Donald Trump has been noncommittal about how involved Ukraine would be in the peace talks, leading world policy experts to believe a deal could be negotiated behind Kyiv’s back.

The Source

More in World
Reuters: Finnish President to Trump: If Putin wins in Ukraine, the US loses
Business Insider: Russia is relying so heavily on North Korea that it’s getting 50% of its ammo from Pyongyang, Ukraine’s spy chief says
The Guardian: More than 200,000 Canadians sign petition to revoke Musk’s citizenship

Maddow Blog | Rachel Maddow: Republicans silent after Trump reportedly slashes funds for Alzheimer’s center

MSNBC

Maddow Blog | Rachel Maddow: Republicans silent after Trump reportedly slashes funds for Alzheimer’s center

Rachel Maddow – February 21, 2025

Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK); Rachel Maddow

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what’s in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

This is an adapted excerpt from the Feb. 20 episode of “The Rachel Maddow Show.”

For 26 years, the state of Missouri was represented in Congress by Republican Roy Blunt. He began as Rep. Blunt, serving in House Republican leadership for years, before becoming a senator.

Blunt, among everything else he did during his time in office, was a persistent advocate for funding Alzheimer’s research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). When Blunt announced in 2021 that he was retiring from office, the NIH decided to dedicate their very important Alzheimer’s research center to him. They called it the Roy Blunt Center for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Research.

At the dedication ceremony, in 2022, Blunt talked about the importance of NIH funding and Alzheimer’s research funding specifically. A bunch of other Republicans from Congress showed up as well and stressed how important it was to fund that specific program. Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma told the crowd, “To be able to do what we’ve done, a fivefold increase in Alzheimer’s and dementia research is a very special thing.”

“This is our most expensive disease,” he continued. “And you can look at the trendline of what it costs to pay for Alzheimer’s and you’ll pretty quickly make the point that it’s cheaper to try and cure it, or at least manage it and delay it, than it is to deal with it. And that has really guided the investments here more than anything else.”

Cole made the point that funding this specific Alzheimer’s center is not just a good thing to do, it also saves the government money in the long run. But, you can probably guess where this is headed.

This week, The New Republic reported that the Trump administration has now slashed funding to that Republican-beloved Alzheimer’s center. Approximately one-tenth of the center’s workers have now been let go, including its incoming director, “a highly regarded scientist credited with important innovations in the field,” people familiar with the situation told The New Republic.

On Wednesday, Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, senior member of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, said senior scientists and the center’s acting director were fired by the Trump administration.

Cole’s office did not respond to a request for comment about these reported cuts, but Michael Greicius, a neurologist at Stanford University, explained to The New Republic the devastating impact closing the center would have on Alzheimer’s research. “[The center] has developed infrastructure and a brain trust that’s really unmatched in the world, in terms of its advances in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s,” he said. “Weakening [it] will set Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s research back substantially.”

If you’re looking for a poster child for something this administration is doing that has no apparent support from anyone — and that can be expected to have not just public opposition and expert opposition but specifically Republican opposition — I think you’ve got your winner.

This is not the time for presidential deference, the Huns are at the gates of our Constitutional Democracy: Ex-Presidents Under Fire for Silence on Trump: ‘The Time Is Now’

Daily Beast

Ex-Presidents Under Fire for Silence on Trump: ‘The Time Is Now’

Liam Archacki – February 20, 2025

Former U.S. Vice Presidents Al Gore and Mike Pence, Karen Pence, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former U.S. President George W. Bush, Laura Bush, former U.S. President Barack Obama, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and Melania Trump.
Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Some Democratic are dismayed that the living former U.S. presidents have largely fallen silent amid the whirlwind first month of Donald Trump’s presidency.

Despite each offering some degree of criticism against Trump in the past, the four other presidents—Bill ClintonGeorge W. BushBarack Obama, and Joe Biden—have kept quiet during the Trump White House’s assault on political norms.

“No one knows more about the importance of our presidents respecting separation of powers and showing restraint than former presidents,” Democratic strategist Joel Payne told The Hill. “Given Trump’s ongoing power grab, those voices and perspectives of our ex-presidents would be critical to the public discourse at this moment.”

His stance was echoed by unnamed former senior Obama aide.

“I don’t know what they’re waiting for,” the insider told The Hill. “The time isn’t when Trump ignores court rulings. The time is now.”

Donald Trump arrives to welcome Marc Fogel back to the United States after being released from Russian custody, at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. / Al Drago / Getty Images
Donald Trump arrives to welcome Marc Fogel back to the United States after being released from Russian custody, at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. / Al Drago / Getty Images

Since entering office on Jan. 20, Trump has given his critics plenty of fodder. He has installed loyalists in key administration positions, flouted the Constitution by issuing brazen executive orders, and fired thousands of federal employees (with Elon Musk’s help).

On Wednesday, Trump went as far as to refer to himself as a “king.”

All three of the Democratic presidents had been unsparing in their previous criticism of Trump.

In his farewell address, Biden warned that “an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power, and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms.”

He emphasized the importance of staying “engaged” in the Democratic process.

Meanwhile, Obama and his wife Michelle Obama were two of Kamala Harris’ highest-profile surrogates during the 2024 campaign.

A month after Trump’s election, Obama gave a speech about the “increasing willingness on the part of politicians and their followers to violate democratic norms, to do anything they can to get their way.”

Obama did dip his toes into Trump criticism earlier this month, posting on X a New York Times op-ed slamming Trump and Musk’s push to end the U.S. Agency for International Development.

“USAID has been fighting disease, feeding children, and promoting goodwill around the world for six decades,” he wrote. “As this article makes clear, dismantling this agency would be a profound foreign policy mistake – one that Congress should resist.”

Otherwise, it’s been crickets.

Although Bush has seemed to cast indirect criticism at Trump and MAGA Republicanism, he has long refrained from explicit rebukes of his party member.

“It’s out of respect to the office,” a former Bush aide told The Hill. “It’s just not his style.”

In the past, presidents in general have steered clear of openly criticizing their successors—seemingly as sign of deference.

To that point, Democratic strategist Lynda Tran told The Hill that “in the age of Trump, it’s more important than ever that we respect and adhere to long-standing traditions,” like past presidents avoiding public debates with the sitting commander in chief.

She urged “faith in the other branches of government.”

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President George W. Bush, former First Lady Laura Bush and former President Barack Obama attend the inauguration of Donald Trump in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Donald Trump takes office for his second term. / Pool / Getty Images
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President George W. Bush, former First Lady Laura Bush and former President Barack Obama attend the inauguration of Donald Trump in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Donald Trump takes office for his second term. / Pool / Getty ImagesMore

Meanwhile, Susan Del Percio, a Republican strategist who doesn’t support Trump, said that there would be no upside to criticism from the presidents.

“They can’t, and they know it,” she said. “If they lend their voices to the conversation, they’ll just be taken down by Trump. If they speak out, it’ll be for the history books, not to affect the Trump presidency now.”

More in Politics
Daily Beast: Trump Sends Resolute Desk for Touch-Up After Musk’s Son Seemingly Wiped a Booger on It

Some people believe trump is gay and had a love affair with putin: Anthony Scaramucci Hints at Putin and the KGB’s Mystery ‘Hold’ Over Trump

Daily Beast

Anthony Scaramucci Hints at Putin and the KGB’s Mystery ‘Hold’ Over Trump

Isabel van Brugen – February 21, 2025

Anthony Scaramucci answers reporters' questions.
Chip Somodevilla / Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Anthony Scaramucci expressed concerns about his old boss Donald Trump and his “weird” relationship with Vladimir Putin on Friday.

Scaramucci, who briefly served as Trump’s White House communications director in 2017, discussed Trump’s approach to the Russian president during an episode of “The Rest Is Politics US” podcast with co-host Katty Kay.

Kay teased that the discussion would explore what leverage Russian Putin might have over Trump, and asked Scaramucci why he thinks Trump is now pinning the blame for the war on Ukraine.

“My silence is because what I really think is not in the mainstream,” Scaramucci replied. “And so what I really think, if I end up saying it on our podcast, people will say, OK, I’m being absurd. OK, so—but I think there’s a hold on him.”

Scaramucci did not elaborate on what he believes that “hold” might be, adding only: “I don’t know why it’s like this. [H.R.] McMaster couldn’t figure it out, [James] Mattis couldn’t figure it out, [John] Kelly couldn’t figure it out.”

The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for comment.

A little over a month into his second term, Trump has done a 180 on Washington, D.C.’s stance on the three-year-old war in Ukraine. He has blamed Kyiv for starting the conflict, cast doubt on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s legitimacy, downplayed Russia’s war aims, and backtracked on U.S. support for Kyiv.

Tensions between Trump and Zelensky escalated further this week when Trump took to Truth Social, calling the Ukrainian leader a “dictator without elections.” He demanded wartime elections in Ukraine, despite the fact that martial law—imposed in response to Putin’s invasion—has prohibited them from taking place.

Scaramucci said he and other officials in Trump’s first administration would talk about Trump’s relationship with Russia.  / Anadolu / Getty Images
Scaramucci said he and other officials in Trump’s first administration would talk about Trump’s relationship with Russia. / Anadolu / Getty Images

Scaramucci didn’t hold back—he called Trump’s relationship with Putin “weird” and blasted him for pushing Kremlin narratives.

“It’s the 30th day in, he’s literally reciting Putin talking points at press conferences,” said Scaramucci.

Kay asked Scaramucci if he and other officials would talk about Trump’s relationship with Russia during his first administration.

Wake Up MAGA Voters, You’re About to Get Crapped On: Trump’s Commerce Secretary Confirms Plan to Gut Medicare—and More

The New Republic

Trump’s Commerce Secretary Confirms Plan to Gut Medicare—and More

Malcolm Ferguson – February 20, 2025

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s billionaire buddy turned commerce secretary, has confirmed that the administration was simply lying to MAGA supporters about not touching Social Security and Medicare.

“Back in October … I flew down to Texas, got Elon Musk to [set up DOGE], and here was our agreement: that Elon was gonna cut a trillion dollars of waste fraud and abuse,” Lutnick told Jesse Waters of Fox News Wednesday night. “We have almost $4 trillion of entitlements, and no one’s ever looked at it before. You know Social Security is wrong, you know Medicaid and Medicare are wrong. So he’s gonna cut a trillion and we’re gonna get rid of all these tax scams that hammer against America and we’re gonna raise a trillion dollars of revenue.”

Just last week, President Trump promised that “Social Security won’t be touched, other than if there’s fraud or something. It’s going to be strengthened. Medicare, Medicaid—none of that stuff is going to be touched.”

Fast forward a week, and he endorsed House Republicans’ budget plan, which is expected to make an $880 billion cut to Medicaid to pay for tax cuts for the rich.