Florida Ex-Felons Can Finally Register to Vote

“This Is What Democracy Is All About”: Florida Ex-Felons Can Finally Register to Vote

It could lead to the largest expansion of new voters since the Voting Rights Act.

By Ari Berman                January 8, 2019

Desmond Meade fills out a voter registration form with his wife, Sheena, at the Supervisor of Elections office on January 8.John Raoux/AP

On Tuesday morning, Desmond Meade went down to the the Orange County elections office in Orlando, Florida, and registered to vote for the first time in decades. Since being released from prison, where he was held on a gun possession charge, in 2005, Meade had been unable to vote because of a Florida law preventing ex-felons from casting a ballot even after they’d paid their debt to society.

In 2018, Meade—now president of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition (FRRC)—led the effort to pass a ballot initiative overturning the felon disenfranchisement law. It passed on November 6 with 64 percent of the vote. The initiative, known as Amendment 4, went into effect Tuesday morning.

“It was a very, very emotional moment,” Meade said on Facebook after he submitted his voter registration form, his eyes welling up with tears. He was surrounded by his wife and kids and wore a “Let My People Vote” t-shirt. “Across the state of Florida, our democracy is being expanded. That’s a great thing.”

View image on Twitter

Steven Lemongello: Desmond Meade, who led the years-long effort to return the right to vote to 1.4 M former felons in Florida, registered this morning at the Orange County elections office

Amendment 4 automatically restores voting rights to people with felony records who have completed their full sentences, except those convicted of murder or a sexual offense. Before it passed, Florida was one of only four states that prevented ex-felons from voting, which blocked 10 percent of Floridians from casting a ballot, including 1 in 5 African Americans. The enactment of Amendment 4 could lead to the largest increase in new voters in the state since the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The passage of Amendment 4 was particularly remarkable given that Florida elected a Republican senator and a Republican governor in 2018 who both opposed restoring voting rights to ex-felons. Amendment 4 attracted significant support from Republicans in Florida, even as their party invested heavily in making it harder to vote nationwide. In a huge expansion for voting rights, eight states approved ballot initiatives in 2018 to make it easier to vote and harder to gerrymander.

A huge and improbable coalition supported Amendment 4, ranging from the American Civil Liberties Union to the Christian Coalition to the Koch brothers’ political network. “We are fighting just as hard for that person that wishes he could vote for Donald Trump as that person who wanted to vote for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton,” Meade told me when I visited Florida in August. “We don’t care about how a person may vote. What we care about is that they have the ability to vote. That is our compass.”

Meade’s own story was equally remarkable, as I reported for Mother Jones:

On a muggy August day in 2005, Desmond Meade stood in front of the railroad tracks north of downtown Miami and prepared to take his life. He’d been released from prison early after a 15-year sentence for gun possession was reduced to three years, but he was addicted to crack, without a job, and homeless. “The only thing going through my mind was how much pain I’d feel when I jumped in front of the oncoming train,” Meade said. “I was a broken man.”

But the train never came, and eventually Meade walked two blocks to a drug treatment center and checked himself in. He got clean, enrolled in school, and received a law degree from Florida International University in 2014. Meade should have been the archetypal recovery success story­—­“[God] took a crackhead and made a lawyer out of him,” as he put it. But he’s not allowed to practice law. And when his wife ran for the Florida House of Representatives in 2016, he couldn’t vote for her. “My story still doesn’t have a happy ending,” he said. “Because despite the fact that I’ve dedicated my life to being an asset to my community, I still can’t vote.”

Meade’s unlikely partner in the felon restoration effort was Neil Volz, a former chief of staff for Republican Rep. Bob Ney of Ohio and a top lobbyist for onetime superlobbyist Jack Abramoff. Volz was a GOP power broker in Washington until Abramoff’s pay-for-play lobbying scheme unraveled and Volz pled guilty in 2006 to conspiring to corrupt public officials. He lost the right to vote when he moved to Florida afterward, and registered for the first time in over a decade on Tuesday.

View image on Twitter

Neil Volz: Today…no words. Grateful to God and everyone who has fought to protect our ability to vote!

“Year by year, when you don’t have the vote, you really take on an appreciation for having the ability to vote,” Volz, who’s now the political director for FRRC, told me after he registered at the Lee County elections office in Fort Myers. Similar stories of ex-felons registering across the state circulated widely on social media.

View image on Twitter

Andrew Pantazi: Corri Moore, 42, was one of the first people downtown to register to vote today. He said he lost his right to vote about 14 years ago for a felony charge of driving with a suspended license. He most regrets not getting to be a part of the historic 2008 election of Barack Obama.

“Thousands of people are registering to vote today,” Volz said. “It’s a real acknowledgement of the sacredness of democracy that’s happening in front of our eyes.”

Some top Republican officials in Florida, however, have sought to delay the implementation of Amendment 4. New GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis, who officially took office on Tuesday, said in December that the Florida Legislature, which does not convene until March, should pass “implementing language” before Amendment 4 took effect. Voting rights groups countered that the amendment was “self-executing” and “the Legislature does not need to pass implementing legislation in order for the amendment to go into effect.” Though new registrants are being processed today, the Legislature could still make the implementation of the law more restrictive when it convenes in the spring.

Paul Lux, president of the Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections, told me that election officials in Florida had received no guidance from the state on how to comply with Amendment 4. “What we’ve heard is nothing,” he said. He said county supervisors, who oversee voter registration, would register new voters as required by the new law. “I am not aware of any supervisors who have said they won’t take registration forms,” Lux said. Meade and Volz said they were not aware of anyone being turned away from registering. “They were letting people register and celebrating with us,” Meade said of election officials.

View image on Twitter

Steve Bousquet: Craig Aiken, 43, who did time for drug possession, registered to vote in Jacksonville Tuesday. “A second chance to be human,” he said of Amendment 4, which Florida voters approved in November.

Meade invited DeSantis to celebrate with returning citizens (his preferred term for ex-felons) who were registering today, noting that over 1 million DeSantis supporters also voted for Amendment 4. “We have a governor who campaigned on abiding by the rule of law, and this is the law now,” he said.
View image on Twitter

Zac Anderson: North Port resident Alan Rhyelle is the first convicted felon to register to vote under Amendment 4 in Sarasota County. He was waiting in the parking lot by 7:15 a.m.. Busted for growing pot to help his daughter struggling with prescription meds after car accident.

We must get big money out of politics!

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders

January 15, 2019

Big money continues to corrupt American politics, creating a vicious cycle that funnels more wealth and power to those at the top and eroding our democracy. via Robert Reich

Why We Must Get Big Money Out of Politics

Big money continues to corrupt American politics, creating a vicious cycle that funnels more wealth and power to those at the top and eroding our democracy. via Robert Reich

Posted by U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders on Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Big Pharma Killed My Son!

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders

January 13, 2019

A mother should never have to bury her son because of the hideous greed of pharmaceutical companies. This has got to stop.

Big Pharma's Greed Is Killing Americans

A mother should never have to bury her son because of the hideous greed of pharmaceutical companies. This has got to stop.

Posted by U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders on Sunday, January 13, 2019

Inside one community’s battle against environmental racism

Sierra Club shared a post

January 13, 2019

Inside one community’s battle against environmental racism

St. James Parish in Louisiana — also known as “cancer alley” — is a textbook case of environmental racism, where toxic industry ends up near communities of color.

Inside one community's battle against environmental racism

Welcome to ‘Cancer Alley,’ a predominantly black area in Louisiana that's experiencing the dire effects of chemical pollution.

Posted by Consider It on Wednesday, January 2, 2019

“Wildlife and The Wall.”

The River and the Wall

“Wildlife and The Wall.” A short film showing some of the ecological and wildlife impacts of a border wall.

This is some of the pristine landscape where Trump wants to build a wall.

Tell the Senate to pass the House spending bills and the #TrumpShutdownhere:

Wildlife and The Wall

"Wildlife and The Wall." A short film showing some of the ecological and wildlife impacts of a border wall.

Posted by The River and the Wall on Friday, March 23, 2018

Research details the ‘rapid increase in homelessness’ in certain U.S. cities

Yahoo Finance

Research details the ‘rapid increase in homelessness’ in certain U.S. cities.

Adriana Belmonte       January 14, 2019

Across some of the biggest U.S. cities, rent prices are continuing to rise for lower-income Americans. Meanwhile, an estimated 553,000 people experienced homelessness in 2018, according to Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) data.

And a recent Zillow study — which estimated the number of homeless people in America to be closer to 661,000 — found a specific correlation between rent affordability and the rate of homelessness at a certain threshold: “Communities where people spend more than 32 percent of their income on rent can expect a more rapid increase in homelessness.”

Alexander Casey, a policy advisor on Zillow’s Economic Research team, explained to Yahoo Finance that “15% of the U.S. population lives in areas where a staggering 47% of the homeless population lives. And these are areas where rents are 29% higher on average than the rest of the U.S. And most of these communities are already past this 32% tipping point.”

High rent in America can contribute to a homelessness crisis. (Photo: Courtesy of Zillow)

New York City, Los Angeles, and Seattle stand apart

Zillow researchers clustered different communities together based on “how they’re experiencing rising poverty rates, existing homelessness, homelessness rates, and declining affordability.” The places where people are most at risk of homelessness, according to the study, included New York, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Boston, “which all have crossed the 32 percent affordability threshold.”

The three U.S. cities with the most homeless people in 2018 were New York (78,676), Los Angeles (49,955), and Seattle (12,112), according to the most recent HUD data. A 2016 Wall Street Journal report highlighted that while overall homelessness in America was declining, the homeless population in these cities and others had risen rapidly since 2010.

Fashionistas pose for photographs in front of a homeless man outside Moynihan Station following a showing of the Rag & Bone Spring/Summer 2013 collection during New York Fashion Week September 7, 2012. (Photo: REUTERS/Lucas Jackson)

 

“We attribute a great majority of homelessness to rent affordability,” Megan Hustings, interim director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, told Yahoo Finance. She added that gentrification plays a big role in it, along with public housing developments in urban areas being torn down and the overall “continuous decline of affordable housing units.”

In June 2018, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) received widespread criticism after an Associated Press analysis found that a proposed HUD plan would raise the rent of low-income tenants by about 20%. (Due to the ongoing government shutdown, HUD could not be reached for comment about public housing developments.)

An AP analysis that a 2018 proposal from HUD would have made the issue of high rent in America even worse, especially for children. (Graphic: AP)
High rent in America is a fact of life these days

“We’ve seen rent rising,” Casey said. “Why is that? Can we disentangle that? You start to realize the story of rent affordability and homelessness doesn’t read the same in every single community.”

Over the last five years, the U.S. median rent has risen 11%. As a result, renters earning the national median income have spent 28.2% of their earnings on a rental. According to Zillow, that is significantly “above the 17.7% that median-income households buying a typical home today spend on their monthly mortgage payment.”

When rent affordability exceeds 22%, according to the study, that leads to more people in that community experiencing homelessness. And any increase in rent affordability beyond 32% “leads to a faster-rising rate of homelessness — which could mean a homelessness crisis, unless there are mitigating factors within a community,” Zillow reported.

A good example, according to Casey, is in Houston, Texas. The researchers looked at trends in the city’s rising rent prices and chronic high poverty rates.

High rent in America can be relative to individual cities. (Photo: Courtesy of Zillow)

 

“You see that homelessness rates are significantly lower to similar peer communities in Houston,” Casey said. “The model helps identify Houston as an example as a place of: ‘Here’s other peer communities where national policy folks might want to start to look to see what lessons can be learned. What kind of policies are they implementing?’”

According to National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC)’s Out of Reach 2018 report, a full-time worker earning the federal minimum wage of $7.25 “needs to work approximately 122 hours per week for all 52 weeks of the year, or approximately three full-time jobs, to afford a two-bedroom rental home at the national average fair market rent.”

And, the report stated, in no state “can a worker earning the federal minimum wage or prevailing state minimum wage afford a two-bedroom rental home at fair market rent by working a standard 40-hour week.”

A group of homeless people sleep in the courtyard of the Midnight Mission in Los Angeles. Experts say high rent in America impacts certain cities differently. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
‘The problem is that there’s just so much poverty’

Although it may seem that raising the minimum wage is the solution to fixing this rent affordability issue, Casey argues that may not be the case.

“Los Angeles is a fascinating example,” Casey said. “In L.A., the rent affordability there is really off the charts, no matter how you measure it. Even if you’re a person in L.A. who’s earning the typical income, it’s going to be pretty stretched to afford even a modest-priced rental in that area.

Casey continued: “So what I think L.A. really speaks to is that even if you raised incomes for people that are the most vulnerable to becoming homeless to a significant degree, there just isn’t the availability of housing for them, where you might think in a different city, there are some cheaper rental options available. The problem is that there’s just so much poverty, so few resources, that even if there’s a place that wouldn’t require that much money’s rent every month, that money isn’t there.”

High rent in America can be relative. (Photo: Courtesy of Zillow)
‘The interconnected web of the housing market’

Casey, like Hustings, said that gentrification is a significant factor.

“When we think about gentrification, we think about displacement spillover from one area to the other,” Casey said. “As rent increases that outpaces someone’s income, they’re probably not the people that are going to be experiencing homelessness. They’re just going to rent at a cheaper price.

“But, the fact that data is available at the median and changes for the median income renter are predictive to homelessness rates is just a really powerful illustration of something I think a lot of people fail to recognize,” Casey said, “which is the interconnected web of the housing market. If changes to affordability is affecting someone at the median income level, they might restitute, replace, and bump people down further and further.”

Casey added: “Gentrification is a topic that illustrates how interconnected the rental market is, and that changes to rental prices to one person is kind of a trickle-down effect.”

‘Illustrative for policymakers to bring to Washington’
On an unseasonably cold day, a homeless person tries to stay warm at the entrance of a subway station near the White House in Washington January 20, 2016.  High rent in America ultimately goes back to D.C. (Photo: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

 

Casey concluded that there were several key takeaways from the report.

“This research has helped identify that it’s not going to be a one-size-fits-all solution, and that each of these markets are dealing with very different types of problems,” he said. “In one market, there are things that need to be done in terms of increasing the supply of affordable housing because even with income-based subsidies, and even with vouchers or tenant support, there haven’t been the number of units to help house people.”

He continued: “In other places, there might be units available but they’re sub-standard and there needs to be substantial resources put to the rehabilitation of affordable housing stock. In other places, housing might be decently affordable relatively, and it’s a matter of providing vouchers or income subsidies to families. And still, in other places, there are a wide variety of these types of approaches. Flexibility can be implemented in more local solutions.”

As for the future, Casey hoped policymakers used this kind of research to tackle the nuance of the issue.

“This has helped be illustrative for policymakers to bring to Washington to show we might have different problems here than folks over here,” he said, “and we can shape responses accordingly.”

Adriana is an associate editor for Yahoo Finance.

Did Trump keep his promise to revive the coal industry?

CNN Replay
Did Trump keep his promise to revive the coal industry?

January 7, 2019

More coal-fired power plants have closed under President Trump than in Barack Obama‘s first term. Bill Weir travels to Pennsylvania for a #RealityCheck on the coal industry.

Did Trump keep his promise to revive the coal industry?

More coal-fired power plants have closed under President Trump than in Barack Obama's first term. Bill Weir travels to Pennsylvania for a #RealityCheck on the coal industry.cnn.it/2SBuxnU

Posted by CNN Replay on Monday, January 7, 2019

7 Truths About Immigration!

Robert Reich

January 8, 2018

As Trump crows about immigration in prime time, here are 7 facts about immigration in under 70 seconds.

Help spread this video to combat Trump’s barrage of lies.

7 Truths About Immigration (In Under 70 Seconds)

As Trump crows about immigration in prime time, here are 7 facts about immigration in under 70 seconds. Help spread this video to combat Trump's barrage of lies.

Posted by Robert Reich on Tuesday, January 8, 2019

It’s True: trump Is More Dishonest Than Other Politicians!

Esquire

It’s OK to Say the President Is More Dishonest Than Other Politicians. It’s the Truth.

America’s Fact-Checkers met the Trump Oval Office Challenge with good work and Both Siderism.

By Jack Holmes      January 9, 2019

President Trump Addresses The Nation On Border Security From The Oval OfficeGetty ImagesPool

We were blessed last night as, like a legendary but aging rock band that’s on tour supporting a feckless new album, President Trump just played the hits in his big Oval Office speech. El Jefe mostly trotted out the same old fabrications from his rallies, as he portrayed undocumented immigrants as violent criminals (they do not commit more crimes than native-born Americans) and suggested The Wall would pay for itself, because drugs and trade deals. He did not, thankfully, declare a state of emergency and embark on a campaign to abuse the power vested in him for nakedly political gain. Also, he calmly read aloud from the teleprompter, which apparently sent his aides over the moon. The bar just got ten feet lower.

It was also a decent evening for The Fact-Check Industry. The Washington Post published a fact-check “cheat sheet” before the speech, which was useful and effective because it operated on the premise—based on a huge body of evidence—that the president would repeat his standard false claims about the situation at the border, and offered viewers a way to cope. Across the board, networks sought to assess the truth of the president’s claims right after he finished. CNN hosted the Toronto Star‘s Daniel Dale, the LeBron of the genre, in the immediate postgame to point out the reheated falsehoods he’d served up. This was better than trotting out Rick Santorum, whom CNN pays to defend the president no matter what he says or does. That came later.

But alas, the night was not immune to some of the structural issues afflicting The Media and its coverage of Our National Discourse.

AP Fact Check: Democrats put the blame for the shutdown on Trump. But it takes two to tango. Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion for his border wall is one reason for the budget impasse. The Democrats refusal to approve the money is another.
https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/media:2fdeb2d130024112846cb96733e4ce32/400.jpeg
AP FACT CHECK: Trump and the disputed border crisis

WASHINGTON (AP) — In his prime-time speech to the nation, President Donald Trump declared a border crisis that’s in sharp dispute, wrongly accused Democrats of refusing to pay for border security and…       apnews.com

The impulse to grant Both Sides legitimacy in every single argument, regardless of whether their claims are tethered to reality, dies very hard indeed. Perhaps more accurately, the drive to avoid accusations of bias from the right is immortal. It is a simple fact that Donald Trump, American president, shut down the government. He said he was going to shut down the government:

Embedded video

David Mack: Trump gives the Democrats the best soundbite they could possibly hope for: “Yes, if we don’t get what we want…I will shut down the government. … I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down. I’m not going to blame you for it.”

And then he did.

The person responsible for “the budget impasse,” then, is Donald Trump. He created the impasse by refusing to sign any bill that did not fund The Wall. Senate Republicans passed a funding bill in December to keep government open, and Speaker Paul Ryan was ready to bring it to a vote in the then-Republican House. But it did not include Wall funding, and Rush Limbaugh started saying bad things about Donald Trump on the television. So Trump went nuclear.

Never mind that a majority of Americans reject The Wall, and Trump campaigned on building it to combat a supposed “invasion” at the southern border in the 2018 midterms only to see his party to get trounced. He has no mandate to Build The Wall, yet he took the government hostage and demanded $5.7 billion to release it. In the AP’s assessment, the other side is equally responsible for refusing to pay the ransom.

US-POLITICS-BORDER-TRUMP-CONGRESS

 

This intriguing logic was evident elsewhere. When Democrats took control of the House last week, they passed a funding bill very similar to the Senate Republican bill from December, though it split Homeland Security funding into a separate, stopgap bill. This would allow Senate Republicans to vote to reopen the government with assurance the border-security debate would be revisited in the shorter term. Some House Republicans voted with Democrats to pass it. In other words, this would have reopened the government largely on the terms initially agreed to by both sides before Trump threw a hissy-fit.

For the fact-checkers at NBC News, however, this was a “provocation:”

The facts: House Democrats did pass spending bills to re-open government as their first act upon taking control of the chamber. But the bills were more of a provocation than real legislation; Democrats knew they would not be taken up by the Senate or signed by Trump. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in no uncertain terms that any bill that didn’t have obvious support from the White House and Senate majority would not come to his floor for a vote.

“The Senate will not waste its time considering a Democratic bill which cannot pass this chamber and which the president will not sign,” McConnell said.

Notice how this entire thing is framed around the premise of Mitch McConnell’s statement, which might even not be true on the bare facts. If McConnell put the House bill up for a vote, is he positive that four Republicans wouldn’t vote with Democrats to pass it? Or is the risk that could happen the reason he refuses to put it up for a vote? NBC doesn’t ask this question—they accept his claim at face value, even though two Senate Republicans broke the line last week. As the president’s ally, McConnell does not want a bill to pass both houses of Congress without Wall funding, because then Trump will be forced to veto it and very clearly illustrate the reality of the situation: that the president is the one keeping the government shut down.

President Trump Addresses The Nation On Border Security From The Oval Office

 

NBC is right that Democrats knew the bill they passed wouldn’t pass the Senate, but they were only sure of that because McConnell said he wouldn’t allow a vote on it. That doesn’t preclude the House bill from being “real legislation”: they passed a bill similar to one the Republican Senate had previously passed, and which Trump was ready to sign until the right-wing pundits came knocking on his TV screen with pitchforks.

Notice that this Fact-Check by a Neutral, Unbiased Media Referee is making value judgments on what’s “real legislation” and what’s a “provocation,” and framing the discussion based on the prerogatives of the Senate Majority Leader. It’s enough to make you wonder whether people who very closely follow current events form opinions about what’s happening, and those opinions at least subliminally impact how they discuss those events. To the extent being neutral and unbiased is possible, it is not always the same as being honest and fair.

Checking whether what any politician of any party says is true is a vitally important function of journalism, but it is not necessary to always find that Both Sides Are Fudging. In this case, it’s something of a performance, to show the Democratic response to Trump’s predictable parade of nonsense has also been Subjected to Scrutiny. It feels like an attempt to even the scales. After all, NBC fact-checked three more claims from The Response in that article. It found two to pretty much be accurate. In the fourth instance, NBC suggested Schumer’s characterization of The Wall as 30-feet high did not do justice to Candidate Trump’s inane ramblings, which sometimes put it as high as 65 feet. Is this serious? It’s hard to tell.

Elsewhere, The New York Times dinged Schumer for suggesting the shutdown was hurting “millions of Americans,” as a Fact-Checker suggested only 800,000 federal workers have been furloughed. But Schumer didn’t say federal workers, he said Americans, and the Times‘ own reporting indicates he is probably right. Regardless, those 800,000 workers have families. It’s OK to say the president is more dishonest than other politicians. It’s the truth, and he and his allies will attack you either way.

President Trump will not answer any more questions from Mueller

Reuters

 By Karen Freifeld, Reuters      January 9, 2018