Hurricane Milton is set to pass directly right over my house. I’m ready.

Hurricane Milton is set to pass directly right over my house. I’m ready.

Hurricanes are an unfortunate lifestyle that Floridians have embraced.

Sean Kernan – October 7, 2024

Two kids playing in street
Me and a friend helping a flooding vehicle after a storm.

I was a young boy, living with my grandparents in a brick, sturdy home, that my grandfather built by hand. The morning before the storm came in, I helped him board up our windows.

I leaned into his ladder with all of my weight, keeping it sturdy as he stood at the top, swinging his hammer to bolt on another board.

“Do these boards even help?” I asked, adding to my endless list of questions.

“Yes, dang it. Now hold that ladder,” he said, getting frustrated with a loose board.

“It’s going to be a strong storm,” he growled. “You need to toughen up and be prepared to help me when it hits. Anything can happen.”

Grandpa was born in the Great Depression, and had this gruff way about him, that wasn’t always pleasant, but was underscored by caring and love, no matter how harsh he seemed.

“But it rains here all the time Grandpa. We got a big storm before, and – “

“Not like this one,” he said, interrupting me before I could finish.

Hurricane Andrew hit us directly that night. People forget how apocalyptic the storm was, with winds stronger than that of Hurricane Katrina. It certainly lived up to its reputation with us.

The wind picked up in the wee hours that night, with thin drops pelting our house sideways like pellets. I stared out the window intermittently that night, noticing the branches and leaves moving side to side, then up and down. Sometimes, they’d bend far to one side in the wind, stuck in that position like the tree was stretching its limbs before a workout.

I slept for one hour before I heard a huge explosion outside. A transformer had blown as a power line came down. The house heated up within minutes, sending an intrusive thick blanket of humidity crawling into the house, reminding us that the storm wasn’t our only problem. Losing your power in August in Florida could feel like a death sentence. Unfortunately, it was, for some. Our power wouldn’t return for two days.

The wind grew and grew. The sound of rain hitting the house also grew louder, as the droplets began sounding like bullets hitting the brick walls. Our roof creaked in agony, like a giant ship at sea, struggling to stay afloat during a storm.

Eventually, the wind was so strong that the seams on our windows, and other small cracks in our structure, started to whistle and scream like a banshee haunting the building. That part scared me more than anything else. Not even the vibrating brick walls terrified me as much as that howling. I can still hear it.

At 4 AM, I heard my grandmother calling out to me, “Sean. Help me.” Feeling panicked, I rushed out into the dining room, which was pitch black. Shuffling my feet, attempting to remember every minor obstacle, I inched forward and saw a figure on the floor, her form crumpled on the ground. Terror set upon me and, for a moment, I thought my grandmother was dead. She’d clearly fallen.

“Help me get up, Sean,” she said, meekly from the floor.

My towering grandfather suddenly loomed in the kitchen, his dark form behind me. Inexplicably, he seemed angry at grandma, saying, “What are you doing down there Vivian! Get up!”

“She fell grandpa!” I said, pleadingly.

Grandma shouted up, “What do you think I’m doing? Looking for pennies? You fool!”

The stress of the situation had gotten to everyone. I was unsettled that night, though not terrified. An hour later, I heard the sound of groaning wood from my bedroom, which grew progressively louder until I heard a large collapsing sound. Peeking through my blinds, I saw a huge tree in our backyard, with a five foot wide trunk that had been pulled sideways.

The storm wasn’t the first or last I’d experience, but was certainly the strongest.

The morning came, and I stepped outside to see a different neighborhood. Across the street, one neighbor’s entire roof was peeled off, like a giant had come and lifted it, while looking for people to snack on.

The street was littered with shingles and branches. Small pieces of debris that had once been part of our homes blew in the wind. The air was eery and still — a striking contrast to the night before.

A neighbors car was impaled with a large branch, right through the front of the driver’s side window. It brought home how dangerous these storms could be.

The streets weren’t even flooded either. Only a few puddles here and there. If you live in Florida long enough, you learn that every hurricane is its own monster, a howling feral beast with invisible hands. Some unleash torrents of rain, turning streets into rivers. Others, like Andrew, wielded the wind like a weapon, ripping through everything in sight with brutal force.

I walked through our circular neighborhood, eventually bumping into other boys I knew. Our childlike capacity for play kicked in, and we spent hours climbing over uprooted trees, walking on branches that were once far too high for our reach.

In an instant, we forgot the chaos and devastation, and started having fun in that moment, as only a child can.

There was an enormous live oak, which was more than a hundred years old, and had been turned horizontal. I got up on it, and began working my way to what was formerly the top branch, which stood nearly 40 meters.

As I balance beamed my way over a high branch, I heard a deep voice, “Hey you! Kid! Get down from there!”

A fireman, in full attire, was standing below the knocked down tree, holding an axe. Behind him, was a huge black truck, that was quickly filling with branches. These rescue crews were working their way through the neighborhood, checking homes and clearing roads.

And so ended our day of play in the apocalyptic landscape around us. Sadly, many families lost so much that day, including loved ones who were ripped from their lives. Perhaps it was a blessing that I was young, and not capable of comprehending the loss so many were experiencing. It’s hard to even conceive of that pain as I look back now upon our neighborhood.

A reflection on the current threat

I was born in Florida and have lived here most of my adult life. There’s a silent pact you make when moving here. You know what it entails, and that storms are an inevitability.

Recently, I’ve been getting many heartfelt messages. I live in Tampa, where a storm is barreling down upon us. As of my writing this, the storms path is aimed directly over my house, only a few days from now.

Author map.
My home is the X.

The worst part of moments like this isn’t fear per se, but more the uncertainty. You just want to know one way or the other if it is going to hit. You also get into this weird mindset where you are watching the radar, wishing to move the storm north or south, which would inevitably hit another city instead. It isn’t a conscious wish for the demise of another, but an odd though many peers and I experience.

If it does hit, this would be the fifth direct hit hurricane I’ve experienced, on top of the many others that have grazed us. My mindset as a boy was more that of fear of my physical health. Today, I tend to worry more about damage to my property, and the health of those around me. I know that my home is sturdy and strong, but many homes are not. They stand to lose much. Because property insurance has become so extraordinarily expensive, many can’t afford it. I’m currently in evacuation Zone C, and waiting to see what the updates entail.

Another hurricane is upon us. These storms become a sort of lifestyle choice for us Floridians. Even when hurricanes aren’t hitting, we get massive storms slamming into us on the regular.

Alas, we move here knowing what to expect. We leave a few chips on the poker table. The comforting smell of salty air carries the subtle promise of chaos, the grim possibility that mother nature shall return to remind us who is queen.

To those of you in the path, please be safe. Listen to your evacuation orders. Your life is more important than your home.

I’m a former financial analyst turned writer out of sunny Tampa, Florida. I began writing eight years ago on the side and fell in love with the craft. My goal is to provide non-fiction story-driven content to help us live better and maximize our potential.

Why experts are so scared of Hurricane Milton

The Hill

Why experts are so scared of Hurricane Milton

Tara Suter – October 7, 2024

The nation’s eyes are on Florida as Hurricane Milton seems poised to strike the state this week — nearly two weeks after experiencing the destruction of Hurricane Helene.

Residents of the Sunshine State are no strangers to hurricanes, but experts are sounding the alarm over Milton. The storm rapidly intensified into a Category 5 hurricane Monday, only one day after it officially became a hurricane, and “is expected to grow in size and remain an extremely dangerous hurricane when it approaches the west coast of Florida on Wednesday,” according to the National Hurricane Center (NHC).

Here’s why experts are concerned about the storm.

Rapid intensification

The storm officially became a hurricane Sunday, according to the NHC, and on Monday, it had already intensified into a Category 5 hurricane. Rapid intensification, per the NHC, is when “the maximum sustained winds of a tropical cyclone” rise “at least 30 knots in a 24 hour period[.]” Thirty knots is equal to just below 35 miles per hour (mph).

“This is what rapid intensification looks like, going to sleep to a meh category 1 hurricane & waking up to a monster category 5 with 160 mph winds,” CNN meteorologist Elisa Raffa said in a post on the social platform X Monday that featured maps with Milton.

“Truly mind-boggling & scary,” Raffa continued in her post. “This is the trend as our oceans continue to trap heat & fuel stronger storms.”

The science nonprofit Climate Central noted Milton’s rapid intensification in a thread on X Monday, stating that oceans rising in temperature “due to human-caused climate change, are fueling stronger tropical cyclones.”

“#Milton rapidly intensified over sea surface temperatures in the Western Gulf of Mexico, which have been made hundreds of times more likely to be anomalously warm due to climate change,” Climate Central said later in the thread.

A Florida meteorologist who recently got emotional when talking about the severity of Milton said that the Gulf of Mexico, where the storm is currently located, has waters that are “so incredibly hot.”

“You know what’s driving that, I don’t have to tell you … global warming, climate change leading to this and becoming an increasing threat,” John Morales said.

Risk of damage

The NHC said in a forecast discussion Monday that “Milton is expected to grow in size and remain an extremely dangerous hurricane when it approaches the west coast of Florida on Wednesday.”

“A large area of destructive storm surge will occur along parts of the west coast of Florida on Wednesday,” the agency continued. “This is an extremely life-threatening situation, and residents in those areas should follow advice given by local officials and evacuate immediately if told to do so.”

Beyond the storm surge, the NHC also said that possibly “devastating hurricane-force winds are expected along portions of the west coast of Florida where a Hurricane Warning is in effect” and that zones “of heavy rainfall will impact portions of Florida today well ahead of Milton, with heavy rainfall more directly related to the system expected later on Tuesday through Wednesday night.”

“This rainfall will bring the risk of considerable flash, urban, and areal flooding, along with the potential for moderate to major river flooding,” the agency continued.

Bryan Bennett, a Tampa-area meteorologist, said in a post on X Monday that Milton “COULD BE OUR KATRINA,” referencing the cataclysmic 2004 storm that caused mass destruction in New Orleans.

“Winds rotate counterclockwise around a hurricane,” Bennett said. “If the storm makes landfall in Pasco [County] or Pinellas [County], not only will it significantly flood [Clearwater] & St. Petersburg, but much of south Tampa, MacDill [Air Force Base], & downtown Tampa may go underwater.”

Bennett also said when the storm makes landfall, “winds are going to be sustained around 125, gusting to 155 mph,” adding that a wind speed at “150 mph wind is strong enough to take off a roof and damage exterior walls of a well built home.”

“I typically try to keep my message calm & low key,” Bennett said in his post. “But, the potential devastation that this storm may cause is the reason for my concern/worry for my home -Tampa Bay. That is also why I am pushing for so many people to please evacuate.”

Donald Trump Goes Off the Rails With Claim That Some Races Have Murder Gene

Daily Beast

Donald Trump Goes Off the Rails With Claim That Some Races Have Murder Gene

Emell Derra Adolphus – October 7, 2024

Win McNamee
Win McNamee

Donald Trump revealed an unhinged eugenics theory Monday, claiming during a morning rant that some migrants have “bad genes” that make them predisposed to committing murder.

Trump spent a good chunk of an interview on the The Hugh Hewitt radio show slamming the policies of his political opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, and baselessly accused her of wanting to install a communist government.

Trump and GOP Make BS Migrant Claim Amid FEMA Hurricane Shortfall

“She wants to [do] government housing. She wants to go into government feeding. She wants to feed people. She wants to feed people governmentally,” he said as host Hugh Hewitt listened without saying a word. “She wants to go into a community party-type system. When you look at the things that she proposes, they’re so far off. She has no clue.”

Trump then attacked Harris’ handling of illegal immigration—despite her pushing back against his claims of a “crisis”—and alleged that she was letting people into the country with “bad genes.”

“How about allowing people to come to an open border, 13,000 of which were murders, many of them murdered far more than one person, and they are not happily living in the United States,” he said. “And now a murderer, I believe this, it’s in their genes.”

He added, “We got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”

Throughout his presidential campaign, Trump has shown a fascination with genes—using the topic often during discussions of immigration to suggest some people are more superior than others.

During a 2020 campaign speech in Minnesota, Trump told a majority white crowd of his supporters that they have “good genes” and seemed to suggest that immigration and racism challenges in America comes down to genetic differences, reported the New York Times.

“A lot of it is about the genes, isn’t it, don’t you believe?” said Trump. “The racehorse theory, you think we’re so different? You have good genes in Minnesota.”

Donald Trump says there are ‘a lot of bad genes’ among migrants in the US

Reuters

Donald Trump says there are ‘a lot of bad genes’ among migrants in the US

Gram Slattery and Kristina Cooke – October 7, 2024

FILE PHOTO: Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. president Donald Trump holds a rally in Juneau

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what’s in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

By Gram Slattery and Kristina Cooke

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said on Monday there are “a lot of bad genes” in the United States, while discussing murders allegedly committed by immigrants living illegally in the United States.

“How about allowing people to come to an open border, 13,000 of which were murderers,” Trump said in an interview with conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt, while discussing the immigration policies of his Democratic opponent in the Nov. 5 election, Vice President Kamala Harris.

“Many of them murdered far more than one person, and they’re now happily living in the United States. You know, now a murderer, I believe this, it’s in their genes. And we got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”

The former president has frequently attacked migrants on the campaign trail, particularly those who have been implicated in crimes. At times, he has used dehumanizing language, and he has increasingly turned to extremely graphic depictions of the crimes even though a range of studies show immigrants do not commit crime at a higher rate than native-born Americans.

Trump appeared to be referring to a letter from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to Republican Representative Tony Gonzales, released last month, which showed that 13,099 people have been convicted of homicide who are on ICE’s “non-detained docket.” That docket includes various types of immigrants who entered the country legally and illegally.

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security called those statistics misleading.

“The data in this letter is being misinterpreted,” the spokesperson wrote in an email. “The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this Administration. It also includes many who are under the jurisdiction or currently incarcerated by federal, state or local law enforcement partners.”

In a statement, the Trump campaign defended his comments, saying he was speaking only about murderers, not immigrants.

“President Trump was clearly referring to murderers, not migrants,” said Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt. “It’s pretty disgusting the media is always so quick to defend murderers, rapists, and illegal criminals if it means writing a bad headline about President Trump.”

The White House condemned Trump’s remarks.

“That type of language is hateful, it’s disgusting, it’s inappropriate and it has no place in our country,” White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre said.

(Reporting by Gram Slattery in Washington, additional reporting by Kristina Cooke and Jarrett Renshaw, editing by Ross Colvin and Rod Nickel)

Trump attacks Harris’ economic plans, says she ‘wants to feed people governmentally’

Business Insider

Trump attacks Harris’ economic plans, says she ‘wants to feed people governmentally’

Bryan Metzger – October 7, 2024

  • Trump gave a rambling response when discussing Kamala Harris’ economic proposals.
  • He said that she “wants to feed people governmentally.”
  • Trump also said that some immigrants have “bad genes” and are predisposed to murder.

In a Monday morning interview, former President Donald Trump made a series of outlandish and false claims about Vice President Kamala Harris’ economic proposals.

“She wants to go into government housing,” Trump said on The Hugh Hewitt Show. “She wants to go into government feeding. She wants to feed people. She wants to feed people governmentally. She wants to go into a communist party type of a system.”

It’s unclear what Trump meant by “government feeding,” and a Trump spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The comment came after Hewitt, a conservative radio host, noted that Harris has proposed giving $25,000 in down-payment assistance to first-time homebuyers, a policy that some economists have warned would spike demand and raise prices.

“That’s going to drive the prices up, yeah,” Trump said. “Your price is going to be $100,000 dollars more now.”

More broadly, Harris has proposed working with the private sector via tax incentives to build three million more homes, despite the former president’s suggestion that she “wants to go into government housing.”

‘We’ve got a lot of bad genes in our country’

Moments later, Trump pivoted toward immigration, arguing that some immigrants have “bad genes” and are predisposed to murder.

“You know, now a murderer, I believe this, it’s in their genes,” Trump said. “And we’ve got a lot of bad genes in our country right now.”

It’s the latest example of Trump using inflammatory rhetoric to describe some immigrants. Last year, he said that some immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the country, which was seen by many as a reference to racial purity.

Trump also claimed on Monday that Harris has allowed “people to come through an open border, 13,000 of which were murderers.” He was apparently referring to recently released data from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) indicating that more than 13,000 noncitizens in the US who have been convicted of homicide, either in the US or other countries.

The Department of Homeland Security has said that data is being misinterpreted, and that “the data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more.”

Trump: immigrants bringing ‘bad genes’ into US

AFP

Trump: immigrants bringing ‘bad genes’ into US

Frankie Taggart – October 7, 2024

Donald Trump -- pictured at the US-Mexico border on August 22, 2024 south of Sierra Vista, Arizona -- has a history of divisive racial rhetoric (Rebecca Noble)
Donald Trump — pictured at the US-Mexico border on August 22, 2024 south of Sierra Vista, Arizona — has a history of divisive racial rhetoric (Rebecca Noble)Rebecca Noble/GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/Getty Images via AFPMore

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what’s in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

Republican White House hopeful Donald Trump said Monday that illegal immigrants were bringing “bad genes” into the United States, doubling down on previous inflammatory rhetoric about migrants poisoning the blood of the country.

Trump was criticizing his Democratic presidential rival Vice President Kamala Harris in a radio interview when he brought up government figures showing there were thousands of immigrants in the United States who were not in federal immigration detention, despite homicide convictions.

“You know now, a murderer — I believe this — it’s in their genes. We’ve got a lot of bad genes in our country right now,” former president Trump told conservative host Hugh Hewitt.

The White House swiftly condemned Trump’s comments as “vile.”

“That type of language is hateful, it’s disgusting, it’s inappropriate, and has no place in our country,” Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters.

“This comes from the same vile statements that we’ve heard about (how) migrants poison the blood, that’s disgusting.”

Jean-Pierre added: “We’re going to continue to forcefully reject this kind of vile, disturbing, hateful, hateful speech.”

Trump was misconstruing data released in September by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.

The figures cover a period spanning decades, including when Trump was president, and also don’t include people incarcerated in places other than ICE facilities — in state, local or other federal facilities, for example.

– Election issue –

Illegal immigration into the United States, especially over the southern border with Mexico, is a major issue in the November 5 US presidential election.

Polls show it remains a major vulnerability for Harris, with border crossings having risen to record highs at the end of 2023 under President Joe Biden, whom she replaced as the Democratic standard-bearer in July.

But US media reported Monday that migrant apprehensions at the US-Mexico border fell 75 percent year-on-year in September — to the lowest level since the Trump administration — citing Department of Homeland Security statistics.

Trump, who is neck-and-neck with Harris in nationwide and swing-state polling ahead, has spent much of his campaign demonizing both undocumented immigrants and those in the United States legally.

During a rally last month, the 78-year-old former reality TV star said Harris should be prosecuted over Biden’s border policies and called illegal immigrants “animals,” out to “rape, pillage, thieve, plunder and kill.”

“They will walk into your kitchen, they’ll cut your throat,” he said.

And he repeatedly threatened legal Haitian residents in Ohio with deportation, falsely accusing them of eating locals’ pets.

Trump — the oldest major-party White House candidate in history and the first convicted felon to run — accused immigrants of “poisoning the blood of our country” in December in a phrase that earned him comparisons to Adolf Hitler.

Donald Trump wants to reinstate a spoils system in federal government by hiring political loyalists regardless of competence

The Conversation

Donald Trump wants to reinstate a spoils system in federal government by hiring political loyalists regardless of competence

Sidney Shapiro, Wake Forest University and Joseph P. Tomain, University of Cincinnati – October 5, 2024

Then-President Donald Trump standing underneath a portrait of Andrew Jackson in November 2017. <a href=
Then-President Donald Trump standing underneath a portrait of Andrew Jackson in November 2017. Oliver Contreras – Pool / Getty Images

If elected to serve a second term, Donald Trump says he supports a plan that would give him the authority to fire as many as 50,000 civil servants and replace them with members of his political party loyal to him. Under this plan, if he eventually deemed those new employees disloyal, he claims he could fire them too.

The United States has tried such a plan before.

As we write in our book “How Government Built America,” newly elected President Andrew Jackson, after he took office in 1828, fired about half the country’s civil servants and replaced them with loyal members of his political party.

The result was not only an utterly incompetent administration, but widespread corruption.

Swearing allegiance

Jackson’s actions that rewarded political loyalists and punished enemies were a dramatic departure from what the founders had envisioned by establishing an independent civil service whose members were literally pledged to uphold the country’s laws.

In passage of its very first law, on June 1, 1789, Congress required newly appointed federal officials to take the oath of office to uphold the laws of the country and faithfully carry out their duties.

Congress also passed conflict-of-interest legislation at that time to prevent employees from making decisions based on personal financial considerations.

While oaths may have less significance today, they were regarded as significant personal commitments in the 18th and 19th centuries. The U.S. Constitution, for example, contains an oath of office for the president, and it specifies that members of Congress and other federal officials “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this Constitution.”

When President George Washington – and the next five U.S. presidents – hired a new employee, reputations mattered. Each of the presidents looked at how an appointee’s neighbors regarded him and whether he had been elected to local office, an indication that the man – and they were all men – was competent and an honest employee.

That’s not what Jackson, the nation’s seventh president, and his system aimed to do; he wanted loyalists in government jobs.

The spoils system

While the first presidents were concerned with the competence and honesty of civil service employees, Jackson quickly set aside those concerns.

Instead of hiring those who wanted to work for the public interest and the good of the nation, Jackson employed members of his political party who pledged to march in lockstep with him and his policies. This became known as the “spoils system.”

Like Trump, Jackson also had a version of the “deep state” that he opposed. He claimed that the appointment process was aristocratic and blocked the appointment of the ordinary people he represented. He also insisted that experience and competence were unnecessary.

A cartoon depicts a statue of a man riding a pig with the words 'To the Victors goes the Spoils'
A cartoon of President Andrew Jackson atop a pig depicts his spoils system, which rewarded party members with government jobs. Bettmann / GettyImages

Jackson was quite wrong about some of his political appointments.

One of his worst was Samuel Swartwout, a longtime Army friend and political sycophant. Jackson named him to two consecutive terms as collector of customs at New York, where he served from 1829 through 1837.

Considered a plum assignment, the job at the time was the highest paid in federal government and involved collecting taxes and fees on imported goods that arrived in the nation’s busiest port.

But a congressional investigation showed that Swartwout had stolen a little more than US$1.2 million during his tenure, or about $40 million in today’s dollars.

Swartwout had fled to London, but he returned to the U.S. after he was assured that he would not face criminal charges.

Jackson also learned that his power to influence federal agencies with high-level appointments was limited. Such was the case with the U.S. Postal Service.

As a slaveholder, Jackson was disturbed by the mailing of antislavery flyers in 1835 by the American Anti-Slavery Society. Fearing the flyers would lead to a Black insurrection, Jackson instructed his postmaster general, Amos Kendall, an enslaver himself, to fix their problem by limiting the mailings and asking Congress to prohibit the U.S. Postal Service from mailing all abolitionist material.

Congress refused, citing freedom of speech and expansion of presidential authority as the main reasons.

Long after Jackson had left the White House, Congress, between 1864 and 1883, debated making “merit” a key condition of hiring new employees, but nothing happened until after a disgruntled office seeker assassinated President James Garfield.

Congress then passed the Pendleton Act in 1883, which established the merit appointment system still used today. It also put a virtual end to a system that allowed whichever party that won the White House to reward its supporters with tens of thousands of jobs.

A limited exception

Currently, most of the nearly 3 million federal employees are appointed using merit-based hiring that relies on competitive exams. They cannot be fired except for a limited set of reasons, such as poor performance or misconduct.

But the law exempts about 4,000 federal employees whose appointment requires the Senate’s advice and consent and who have been determined by the president to hold a “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making or policy-advocating character.”

The idea is to give a new president the capacity to influence his policymaking by hiring top-level federal officials.

An old picture shows a crowd of people in front of the White House in 1829.
People seeking government jobs crashed the White House on the day of Andrew Jackson’s inauguration. Library of Congress

The plan that Trump supported would extend the president’s authority under the previous exemption to hire and fire tens of thousands of civil servants without regard to merit.

In short, he intends to reestablish the spoils system.

This is no idle threat.

Near the end of his administration, then-President Trump signed an executive order establishing a new job classification within the government’s career civil service called Schedule F for “employees in confidential, policy-determining, policy-making or policy-advocating positions.”

Under that designation, employees would lose virtually all of their civil service protections and could be fired without cause. It’s unclear how much effect Trump’s order had on the federal government because it was enacted two weeks before the 2020 election and was in effect for only a few months.

Shortly after taking office, President Joe Biden reversed Trump’s order.

A thankless task

In our view, if political loyalty replaces merit as the basis of key federal appointments, Americans can expect government to be less competent – as Andrew Jackson learned during his administration.

While this might not matter to those who regard government as unimportant to the country – or worse, the enemy of the country – our book “How Government Built America” tells a much different story about the thousands of federal employees who provide everything from health services to protection from natural disasters.

Not every civil servant is a great employee, nor is every employee of private industry.

But there is ample proof that government works because of the many people behind the scenes in Washington and across the country who serve the American people – and uphold their oaths of office.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Sidney ShapiroWake Forest University and Joseph P. TomainUniversity of Cincinnati

Read more:

Sidney Shapiro is affiliated with the Center for Progressive Reform. .

Joseph P. Tomain does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Your left-leaning ‘protest vote’ is much worse than useless. It will reelect Trump

Miami Herald – Opinion

Your left-leaning ‘protest vote’ is much worse than useless. It will reelect Trump | Opinion

Jeremy Fryberger – October 4, 2024

Imagn Images file photos

In recent months, the 2024 presidential election campaign has included more twists than a Chubby Checker tribute tour. Yet, at least one thing remains constant: When it comes to third-party candidates, older voters — and plenty of younger ones — have seen this story play out before.

In 2016, for example, an extraordinary number of centrists and left-leaners who normally would have supported the Democratic Party‘s presidential nominee — but who had been influenced by decades of disinformation against Hillary Clinton — instead chose Jill Stein or Gary Johnson (or simply didn’t vote). Some even championed the Republican candidate. Thus, many such third-party supporters, “protest votes” and no-shows not only wasted their ballots, but very much assisted putting Donald Trump and his cohort into the White House.

In 2000, Americans similar to those noted above backed not Democratic Party nominee Al Gore, but third-party option Ralph Nader — or just stayed home. And, in light of that election’s incredibly narrow outcome, these specific voters undeniably helped kick-start the eight-year George W. Bush administration — which included the 9/11 terror attacks, the commencement of two foreign wars and the Great Recession, which lasted from December 2007 to June 2009.

Were Bush or Trump even the second choices of these particular third-party or no-show voters? For almost all, it seems the answer is a resounding no — another reminder that elections are not games.

Meanwhile, aside from the relatively rare occurrence of a third-party presidential candidate joining a major party president’s Cabinet, it remains true in our country that the sole period during which third-party candidates (and their supporters) can influence Democratic or Republican policy positions is only before the general election. Yet, once November arrives — or whenever one casts a general election ballot — a third-party vote does nothing but distort the general election race.

As such, citizens who don’t live in one of the few places with ranked-choice voting and choose a third-party presidential option in November (or who don’t participate) will once again not only squander the moment — many of these voters will also inadvertently help their least-preferred candidate become president. And this time, that winning candidate could be a pathological lying, nonstop grifting, constantly crime-ing, twice impeached, quadruple indicted (so far), justice obstructing, society defrauding, court corrupting, national security compromising, alliance crushing, U.S. military disparaging, authoritarian loving, democracy dismantling, fascism-adjacent, anti-woman, sexual abusing, serial philandering, rabidly racist, white supremacist and nationalist, religiously bigoted and intolerant (but nonreligious), anti-science, environment destroying, always whining, vengeance seeking malignant narcissist and convicted felon (which, by the way, says nothing — or perhaps everything — about his 40-year-old running mate who would take charge if a certain 78-year-old couldn’t finish his term).

While none but men have led our nation throughout the U.S. presidency’s 235-year history — 45 of them white, and one African-American — citizens this year have the opportunity to elect not just our first woman president. And Kamala Harris would not be just our first Asian-African-American president, but a spectacularly qualified and prepared Asian-African-American woman president. Don’t miss this chance to be part of it.

Regardless, while tens of millions of Americans recognize the third party trap for what it is, every voter should trust history and avoid wasting their vote on any candidate who won’t possibly win — or even influence policy — yet could clear a path for another candidate and presidency that these very same voters want least of all.

Jeremy Fryberger is an architect living in Ketchum, Idaho, with his wife, their two children and dog.

What’s the healthiest fish to eat? Here are 4 types dietitians recommend — and what they say you should avoid.

Yahoo! News

What’s the healthiest fish to eat? Here are 4 types dietitians recommend — and what they say you should avoid.

Lauren Manaker – October 3, 2024

Top down image of four salmon darnes on a white long oval serving ceramic plate on a wooden table. It rests on a bed of samphire. Lemon slices garnish the fish.
Salmon gets the stamp of approval from dietitians. But what other types of fish should you be eating? (Getty Creative)Catherine Falls Commercial via Getty Images

When it comes to healthy eating, you will be hard-pressed to find a health care provider who isn’t a fan of the tip to “eat more fish.” But, as a registered dietitian, I often remind clients that not every fish is considered a nutritional powerhouse. And while some types of fish are perfectly fine to eat frequently, others should be consumed with caution.

So what are the healthiest fish options you should be stacking on your plate, and what should you be skipping? Read on for the seafood scoop.

What are the health benefits of eating fish?

Many varieties of fish, particularly cold-water oily fish like salmon, are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, “healthy” fats that support heartbrain and eye health.

Furthermore, fish is a source of high-quality protein while being lower in saturated fat, making it a smart choice for those seeking to maintain a balanced diet. It’s also packed with important nutrients such as vitamin D, selenium and iodine, which support immune function, bone health and thyroid regulation.

Regular fish consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of conditions such as coronary heart disease. Additionally, some data links fish consumption to improved mood and a reduced risk of depression among certain populations.

Despite the health benefits associated with regular fish consumption, many Americans aren’t eating enough. While the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends eating 8 ounces, or about two servings, of seafood (which includes fish and shellfish) per week, it notes that nearly 90% of Americans don’t meet that target.

What’s the healthiest fish to eat?

While most fish are excellent additions to a healthy and balanced diet, some stand out as “best” choices for various reasons. Here are four to try.

Salmon

“One of the healthiest fish is salmon, as it is high in health-promoting omega-3 fats,” Melissa Mitri, a registered dietitian, nutrition writer and owner of Melissa Mitri Nutrition, tells Yahoo Life. “Salmon is very nutrient-dense, providing a generous amount of protein, healthy fats, vitamins and minerals in a small portion.” That includes vitamins such as B12 and D and minerals like selenium, which support immune function and bone health.

It’s worth noting that wild salmon contains more protein and potassium — which is great for managing blood pressure — than farm-raised varieties. “Salmon is also low in mercury, a heavy metal that can be toxic to the nervous system and various organs in large amounts,” adds Mitri.

Farmed trout

Farmed trout is a healthy choice due to its rich content of omega-3 fatty acids, which support heart health and reduce inflammation,” according to Mascha Davis, a registered dietitian nutritionist and author of Eat Your Vitamins. “It is also a great source of high-quality protein, [which is] essential for muscle growth and repair. Furthermore, it provides important micronutrients, including vitamin D and selenium, which contribute to overall well-being.”

Davis notes that there have been concerns about fish farming, also known as aquaculture. But she points to “significant advances” in the practice that have made it “more sustainable and cleaner.” Says Davis: “In the U.S., numerous farmed trout operations grow fish in fresh spring water, provide high-quality feed and ensure ethical care for the fish.” One easy way to ensure your farmed fish choices are responsibly raised and free from antibiotics is to look for an Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) label on your product.

Sardines

Sardines are also rich in omega-3 fatty acids. They are a low-mercury fish option thanks to being small and low on the food chain, which limits their mercury accumulation compared with larger predatory fish. This makes them a safer choice for regular consumption, especially for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women and young children.

Choosing sardines with bones (they are soft and edible!) provides an extra boost of calcium, contributing to bone health.

Atlantic mackerel

Mackerel contains essential nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids. It is also a good source of protein, B vitamins and minerals such as selenium and potassium.

Why eat Atlantic mackerel in particular? Compared with other types of mackerel, such as king mackerel, Atlantic mackerel has a notably lower mercury concentration, making it a more health-conscious option.

What fish should I limit?

By and large, most fish, particularly oily varieties, is great for you. But there are considerations that should be made when it comes to consuming fish raw, or eating a type with a high mercury level. (And, of course, anyone with a shellfish allergy should avoid anything within that group.)

High-mercury fish

Mercury is a heavy metal that can accumulate in fish tissue. Consuming high levels of it can lead to serious health issues, including neurological and developmental problems. According to the Food and Drug Administration, limiting mercury is crucial for children and anyone who might become pregnant or breastfeeding.

Some high-mercury fish to avoid or limit include:

  • Shark
  • Swordfish
  • Marlin
  • King mackerel
  • Tilefish
  • Bigeye tuna
Raw fish

Consuming raw fish can pose health risks due to potential contamination with parasites, bacteria or viruses often eliminated through cooking. These pathogens can lead to foodborne illnesses when consumed. Certain individuals, including pregnant women, young children, older adults and people with weakened immune systems, should avoid eating raw fish due to their increased susceptibility to illness.

However, healthy people can generally eat raw fish safely if it is sushi grade, sourced from reputable suppliers and handled properly to prevent contamination. Moreover, certain fish, like salmon and tuna, are deemed safer to consume raw after being frozen at specific temperatures to kill parasites.

Eating too much fish

Eating fish is generally considered healthy. But consuming too much fish can lead to potential health risks, primarily due to the accumulation of mercury and other environmental contaminants in certain fish types. It is important to maintain a balanced intake by choosing fish lower in mercury, like salmon, sardines and trout, and following dietary guidelines to ensure a healthy, varied diet.

How can I get more fish into my diet?

Ready to reap the health benefits of eating fish? Here are some tips to help you hit that two-servings-a-week guidance. (And for anyone who doesn’t like the taste of fish, Mitri suggests starting with a “more neutral-tasting fish” like cod and going from there.)

  • Start with breakfast: Don’t limit fish to dinner. Add smoked salmon or trout to your morning scrambled eggs or avocado toast.
  • Experiment with tacos: Fish tacos are an easy and delicious way to add more fish to your diet. You can use grilled, baked or even canned fish as a filling.
  • Snack on fish: Sliced salmon with cream cheese on whole-grain crackers or tuna-stuffed cucumber boats provide a tasty and nutritious alternative to traditional snacks.
  • Include fish in soups and stews: This is an excellent way to enhance flavor and nutrition. Make a seafood chowder or add chunks of fish like cod or haddock to vegetable soup for a hearty meal.
  • Upgrade your sandwiches: Try a grilled fish sandwich with your favorite topping, or make a tuna melt for a quick and satisfying meal.

To maximize the health benefits of fish, opt for cooking methods like baking, grilling or steaming rather than frying your fish, which can add unhealthy fats. When seasoning or cooking, limit the use of butter and use healthier alternatives like olive oil or lemon juice to enhance flavor. Consider the overall composition of your meal by balancing your fish with a variety of colorful vegetables and whole grains, ensuring a well-rounded intake of essential nutrients and fiber.

Lauren Manaker is a dietitian and author.


🥗 Healthy eating

trump will tell any lie, no matter who it harms; his latest victims are those from hurricane Helene. Trump claims Hurricane Helene response ‘going even worse’ than Katrina

The Hill

Trump claims Hurricane Helene response ‘going even worse’ than Katrina

Brett Samuels – October 3, 2024

Former President Trump on Thursday repeatedly attacked Vice President Harris and the Biden administration’s response to Hurricane Helene by claiming that the federal response so far has been worse than Hurricane Katrina in the latest instance of him turning a natural disaster into a political advantage.

Trump held a rally with supporters in Saginaw, Mich., where he repeatedly claimed the federal government did not have enough funds to respond to the devastation in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina because the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had spent its money on migrants, a notion the White House pushed back heavily on.

“There’s nobody that’s handled a hurricane or storm worse than what they’re doing right now,” Trump said. “Kamala spent all her FEMA money, billions of dollars, on housing for illegal migrants. Many of whom should not be in our country.”

The White House spent the last 24 hours pushing back on Republicans who echoed similar, unsubstantiated claims.

“This is FALSE. The Disaster Relief Fund is specifically appropriated by Congress to prepare for, respond to, recover from, and mitigate impacts of natural disasters,” White House spokesperson Angelo Fernández Hernández said in a statement. “It is completely separate from other grant programs administered by FEMA for DHS.”

Biden has also called on Congress to return from recess to pass additional funding to assist with the recovery efforts. The House and Senate are not due to return to Washington until after the election.

Despite that, Trump went on to call the federal response to Helene “the worst response in the history of hurricanes.”

“A certain president, I will not name him, destroyed his reputation with Katrina,” Trump said, referring to former President George W. Bush. “And this is going even worse. She’s doing even worse than he did.”

The Biden administration has deployed more than 4,800 federal officials to support response efforts, and the president directed the deployment of up to 1,000 troops to assist in North Carolina’s recovery.

President Biden traveled Wednesday to North Carolina to tour storm damage, and he visited Florida and Georgia on Thursday to do the same. He was notably not joined by either Republican governor of either state. Harris traveled to Georgia on Wednesday and is expected to visit North Carolina in the coming days.

The federal government has also been working with states to provide housing assistance for those who need it and to restore power amid widespread outages. Biden has approved major disaster declarations for Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia to free up additional resources.

Trump has spent much of the week attacking his political opponents for the response to Hurricane Helene, which killed more than 200 people across multiple states. It is the deadliest storm since Hurricane Katrina, which caused nearly 1,400 fatalities.

It’s only fed Trump’s history of politicizing responses to natural disasters.

He repeatedly feuded with officials in Puerto Rico as multiple hurricanes hit the island in 2017, the first year he was in office when he claimed without evidence that Democrats had inflated the death toll from Hurricane Maria to make him look bad.

Trump in 2019 insisted Alabama could bear the brunt of Hurricane Dorian, which ultimately landed on the East Coast. In making his claim, Trump used a marked-up projection map produced by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration that conflicted with information given by weather forecasters.

During devastating wildfires in California in 2018, E&E News reported Thursday that White House officials had to show then-President Trump voter data to convince him to release funding for California wildfire victims, hesitating to give money to a blue state.

“You can’t only help those in need if they voted for you,” Biden posted on the social platform X in response to the report. “It’s the most basic part of being president, and this guy knows nothing about it.”