Musk defends Doge and cuts on Fox News: ‘Almost no one has gotten fired’

The Guardian

Musk defends Doge and cuts on Fox News: ‘Almost no one has gotten fired’

Nick Robins-Early – March 27, 2025

<span>Elon Musk at the inauguration ceremony of Donald Trump.</span><span>Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/AFP/Getty Images</span>
Elon Musk at the inauguration ceremony of Donald Trump.Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/AFP/Getty Images

Elon Musk and seven members of his so-called “department of government efficiency” sat down for a rare interview on Thursday evening on Fox News, defending their efforts amid public backlash and concern over cuts to key government agencies.

Over the course of an hour-long sit-down with host Bret Baier, Musk and team members repeatedly attempted to assuage fears over Doge’s targeting of agencies such as the Social Security Administration. Musk also downplayed the number of government employees his initiative has targeted in cuts, saying it was a small percentage of the overall government workforce and others left voluntarily.

“Basically almost no one has gotten fired,” Musk claimed. His initiative has planned to lay off or offer buyouts to 100,000 federal employees, although courts have ordered thousands of workers to be reinstated after finding they were illegally fired.

Related: Doge shutters federal workplace mediator agency after Trump order

Musk and his team at Doge have rapidly accumulated power across federal agencies since inauguration day. They have led the dismantling of USAID, the world’s largest single source of humanitarian aid, as well as fired thousands of government workers. Doge staffers and Musk allies have also gained access to sensitive government data, as well as been placed in key positions at major government agencies.

Doge staffers took turns during the interview framing their efforts as vital to the survival of the government and claiming their overhaul would help Americans. Asked about a Washington Post report that cuts at the Social Security Administration caused the agency’s website to repeatedly crash and resulted in long waits, Musk claimed that he would keep the website online and increase benefits.

“Legitimate recipients of social security will receive more money not less money,” Musk said. “Let the record show that I said this.”

Other members of Doge touted their previous experience working as tech executives, claiming that they could import ideas from Silicon Valley and private enterprises into government.

“We really believe that the government can have an Apple Store-like experience,” said Joe Gebbia, a Doge team member who co-founded Airbnb.

The Fox News interview on Thursday took place as nationwide protests are planned against Musk at Tesla showrooms this coming weekend. Doge is also facing nearly two dozen lawsuits that allege Musk and his team acted without legal authority while violating privacy and transparency laws. He has reacted to the legal pushback and judges’ rulings against the Trump administration by calling on Congress to impeach justices and radically overhaul the judicial system.

Many Doge members have also come under individual public and media scrutiny for their youth and lack of experience in government. Their behavior at agencies has drawn additional criticism from federal employees, who have reported that Doge staffers have siloed themselves off from other workers, hidden their names on video calls and set up Ikea beds to sleep inside federal buildings.

Several Doge workers have already become involved in scandals surrounding their suitability to work with sensitive government systems that affect millions of people. Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old listed as a “senior adviser” at the state department, previously provided tech support to a cybercrime gang, according to a Reuters investigation.

Another Doge staffer who was given access to treasury department systems, 25-year-old Marko Elez, resigned following a Wall Street Journal report that found he was linked to a social media account that made numerous posts that advocated for racism and eugenics. Musk held a poll on X asking if Elez should return, however, and he was reinstated later that month at the Social Security Administration.

Along with Doge’s group of young engineers, several of Musk’s top executives from his private businesses have also shifted over to his government work. Steve Davis, who helped facilitate Musk’s mass layoffs at X and became president of his Boring Company in 2018, is reportedly running Doge’s daily operations. Davis sat beside Musk during the interview on Thursday.

Polling shows that the majority of American voters disapprove of Musk’s initiative, with attitudes to Doge largely divided along partisan lines. Musk’s own favorability among Americans is similar, according to a Pew Research Center survey taken in late January which found Americans overall hold a more negative view of the Tesla CEO.

Musk previously appeared on Fox Business earlier this month to tout Doge’s achievements, as well as claim that he was planning on doubling the team’s staff. He has also been extremely active boasting about Doge’s cost-cutting efforts on X, the social media platform that he owns, although there has been very little public transparency into how the initiative is operating and what savings it is actually making. Analyses of Doge’s public “wall of receipts” website have found it full of errors and the site has deleted billions in claimed savings from its ledger without explanation.

In the same interview, Musk said he was running his slew of businesses, which include X, SpaceX and Tesla, “with great difficulty” because of his work with the Trump administration. Musk has lost some $100bn from his personal fortune due to a slump in Tesla’s stock this year.

Toward the end of the segment, Baier showed part of an additional one-on-one interview with Musk in which he was asked about calling the Arizona senator Mark Kelly a “traitor” for visiting Ukraine. Musk appeared to double down on his attack, saying that Kelly’s credentials as navy combat veteran and former astronaut didn’t matter if he “put the interests of another country above America”.

Musk’s unpopular DOGE piles up legal losses, so Trump targets federal judges

USA Today – Opinion

Musk’s unpopular DOGE piles up legal losses, so Trump targets federal judges

Chris Brennan, USA TODAY – March 24, 2025

To hear President Donald Trump and his unhinged hatchet man Elon Musk tell it, the Department of Government Efficiency is hard at work, successfully rooting out waste, fraud and corruption in federal agencies.

To hear federal judges tell it – DOGE has repeatedly violated the U.S. Constitution and other federal laws and regulations that govern how employees can be fired from their jobs and how their agencies can be dismantled.

Trump and Musk rattle off plenty of claims about DOGE but turn hostile when asked for specifics. The judges go a different route, establishing long legal paper trails with orders and rulings that clearly spell out the law and their logic.

That leaves Trump and Musk looking like grifters in a frenetic con job designed to bewilder us with unprecedented dismemberment of our government. A prime tactic in that grift – melt down in tantrums each time a judge stymies the action.

Fired federal employees are being ordered back onto the payroll. Discriminatory exclusions for transgender members of the military have been put on hold. Canceled contracts are being restored.

DOGE keeps losing in court, so Trump keeps lying about judges

In just the past week, judges have blocked DOGE from what was derided as a “fishing expedition” to rummage through personal information about taxpayers in the Social Security database, stopped what was called the “likely unconstitutional” firings of U.S. Agency for International Development employees, and questioned whether Musk’s leadership of DOGE is unconstitutional.

Opinion: Trump revives ‘with us or against us,’ labeling anything he opposes ‘terrorism’

Trump, long known for explosive outbursts against judges who don’t rule as he likes, popped off again Thursday in a social media post, decrying “Radical Left Judges” blocking DOGE and other administration efforts.

One problem there – judicial data collected and tracked by Adam Bonica, an associate professor of political science at Stanford University, completely debunks that. Using “judicial ideology” measures he helped develop, Bonica found that 76% of the judges who have ruled against Trump were liberals, while 88% were centrists and 50% were conservative.

“The Trump administration portrays judicial opposition as purely partisan, but the data reveals a starkly different reality: judges from across the ideological spectrum are ruling against administration policies at remarkable rates,” Bonica wrote in a post Thursday on his website, On Data and Democracy. “This cross-ideological judicial resistance suggests deeper institutional concerns about executive overreach rather than mere partisan motivations.”

Let’s be honest. Trump and Musk don’t care about our laws.

Trump and Musk couldn’t care less about the constitutional requirement for coequal branches of government, with the president, Congress and the judiciary sharing the power to keep each other in check.

With the losses piling up, Musk is now donating to Republican members of Congress open to impeaching judges for just doing their jobs after spending $288 million last year to help Trump with the presidency.

As of March 15, at least 46 judicial rulings have gone against Trump since he took office and sicced DOGE on the government, according to a tracker regularly updated by The New York Times.

Opinion: Trump is openly defying court orders. When will elected Republicans care?

Trump tries to have it both ways, wailing about judges while bragging that “DOGE has been an incredible success.”

DOGE’s website has become a running joke, with post after post claiming massive cuts that are quickly scrutinized and then debunked.

Musk’s gang of interns, some now raking in six-figure government salaries to report to an unelected billionaire bureaucrat, just delete the debunked posts and throw up new, just as shady, claims.

Trump thinks Supreme Court will be safe space for his lawlessness
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Marine One at the White House on March 21, 2025.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Marine One at the White House on March 21, 2025.

Trump looks to be working from a short-term and long-term plan here.

First, he wants these low-level court challenges to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, where the 6-3 hard-right conservative majority last year issued him a free pass on alleged criminal behavior. Trump always wants more. Now he wants the Supreme Court to say he can abolish government agencies established by Congress and ignore judges who try to stop him.

Second, Trump wants to permanently distort the culture of American public service, to make working for the government an unsustainable economic option, discouraging would-be federal applicants.

New polling shows that’s not so popular. A Fox News poll found that 65% of the people surveyed March 14-17 are extremely or very concerned that DOGE operates with “not enough thought or planning.” Those surveyed are not so impressed with Musk, with 58% disapproving of his DOGE work while 40% approve.

Blueprint, a polling firm aligned with the Democratic Party, found that 54% disapprove of Musk’s performance while 38% approve.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who dealt Trump his immunity free pass last year, felt compelled last week to rebuke the president for demanding the impeachment of a federal judge who ordered a stop to a slapdash deportation plan that sent Venezuelans to a prison in El Salvador.

Trump didn’t care for that, lashing out Thursday in a social media post that demanded that Roberts “fix this toxic and unprecedented situation” – which is how an American president sees a coequal branch of government dutifully doing its work.

He wants this fight to reach the Supreme Court. And, as always, this is not just about winning for Trump. He wants to twist and contort the American government so that, going forward, it just looks too scary to dare fight him at all.

Apparently musk and trump don’t have enough racist white folks to support his MAGANAZI 2025 plans: 67,000 white South Africans have expressed interest in Trump’s plan to give them refugee status

Associated Press

67,000 white South Africans have expressed interest in Trump’s plan to give them refugee status

Gerald Imray – March 20, 2025

FILE – White South Africans demonstrate in support of U.S. President Donald Trump in front of the U.S. embassy in Pretoria, South Africa, Feb. 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay, File)
FILE – White South Africans demonstrate in support of U.S. President Donald Trump in front of the U.S. embassy in Pretoria, South Africa, Feb. 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay, File)
President Donald Trump waves from the stairs of Air Force One upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Monday, March 17, 2025. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)

CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — The United States Embassy in South Africa said Thursday it received a list of nearly 70,000 people interested in refugee status in the U.S. under President Donald Trump’s plan to relocate members of a white minority group he claims are victims of racial discrimination by their Black-led government.

The list was given to the embassy by the South African Chamber of Commerce in the U.S., which said it became a point of contact for white South Africans asking about the program announced by the Trump administration last month. The chamber said the list does not constitute official applications.

Trump issued an executive order on Feb. 7 cutting U.S. funding to South Africa and citing “government actions fueling disproportionate violence against racially disfavored landowners.”

Trump’s executive order specifically referred to Afrikaners, a white minority group who are descendants of mainly Dutch and French colonial settlers who first came to South Africa in the 17th century. The order directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to prioritize humanitarian relief to Afrikaners who are victims of “unjust racial discrimination” and resettle them in the U.S. under the refugee program.

There are approximately 2.7 million Afrikaners in South Africa, which has a population of 62 million. Trump’s decision to offer some white South Africans refugee status went against his larger policy to halt the U.S. refugee resettlement program.

The South African government has said that Trump’s allegations that it is targeting Afrikaners through a land expropriation law are inaccurate and largely driven by misinformation. Trump has posted on his Truth Social platform that Afrikaners were having their farmland seized, when no land has been taken under the new law.

The executive order also criticized South Africa’s foreign policy, specifically its decision to accuse Israel of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza in a case at the United Nations’ top court. The Trump administration has accused South Africa of supporting the Palestinian militant group Hamas and Iran and taking an anti-American stance. The U.S. has also expelled the South African ambassador, accusing him of being anti-America and anti-Trump.

An official at the U.S. Embassy in the South African capital, Pretoria, confirmed receipt of the list of names from the South African Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. but gave no more detail.

Neil Diamond, the president of the chamber, said the list contains 67,042 names. Most were people between 25 and 45 years old and have children.

He told the Newzroom Afrika television channel that his organization had been inundated with requests for more information since Trump’s order and had contacted the State Department and the embassy in Pretoria “to indicate that we would like them to make a channel available for South Africans that would like to get more information and register for refugee status.”

“That cannot be the responsibility of the chamber,” he said.

Diamond said only U.S. authorities could officially register applications for resettlement in the U.S. The U.S. Embassy in South Africa said it is awaiting further instructions on the implementation of Trump’s order.

My Old Friend Is Helping Elon Musk Destroy America

Rolling Stone

My Old Friend Is Helping Elon Musk Destroy America

Adam Green – March 20, 2025

I once took refuge from my political day job by attending laugh-filled game nights at the home of a person now firing tens of thousands of federal workers.

For Steve Davis, Elon Musk’s right-hand man at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), life has always been a game. A puzzle to be solved regardless of a larger vision or set of values.

But sadly, as I told The New York Times, my friend who was once a fun outside-the-box thinker is now a drone — blindly subservient to a corrupt billionaire on a self-enriching power trip.

Even worse for millions of Americans, Steve’s current tunnel vision doesn’t allow him to challenge the obvious flaw in the game handed to him by Musk. This game only gives points for cutting dollars in the federal budget, even if greater financial costs — plus the cost of human pain — are transferred to American families and businesses.

Most Americans have never heard of the guy hurting their lives. Here is what Americans should know about Steve Davis, especially Republican members of Congress caught between the ideal of “government efficiency” and the enormous pushback that their constituents are expressing every day.

Steve is eccentric. His former Washington, D.C. apartment looked like a start-up, with a ping pong table and beverage machine to delight guests. He once threw a dinner party that included a squire announcing people at the door, a magician, and playful Justin Bieber plates.

I passed on the opportunity to invest what Steve described as “fun money” in his bar, called Thomas Foolery. Customers could shoot each other with squirt guns and drink prices were left to a game of chance. Shockingly, the bar failed quickly.

Steve would shun political talk, saying, “I know nothing about politics.”

He was more interested in playing games with friends long into the night. He often created new rules, respecting those who were quick enough to keep up and throwing barbs at those who stumbled.

He was the lone Washington staffer for Elon Musk’s SpaceX for years. In order to get his first engineering job, Musk reportedly required Steve to reduce the cost of a $120,000 item. Steve got it down to $3,900. (Whether that new part ultimately transferred costs to customers is unreported.)

Friends were barely ever reminded of Steve’s employment — an exception being at a yearly scavenger hunt he threw at Mr. Yogato, his yogurt shop where people won discounts by doing dances, knowing song lyrics, and answering Seinfeld trivia. Winning scavenger teams received items that had been launched into space or won Tesla test drives.

I last heard from Steve in 2023 and don’t remember seeing him in person since 2018, when he departed Washington for Texas to be closer to SpaceX’s rocket launch site. The few times I engaged Steve about Musk a decade ago, their relationship seemed distant. But that changed, as did his innocent gamesmanship.

A recent book called Character Limit reports that Musk worked with many sycophants, but Steve “took it even a tad further” and “idolized” Musk.

He eventually became Musk’s loyal fixer. Steve described his relationship with Musk as “Look here, Davis, get this done!”

When Steve ran into regulatory roadblocks, Musk reportedly berated Steve and threatened to fire him — traumatic game rules that Steve would clearly carry with him. When asked about his vision of colonizing space, Steve said that vision question “is for the Elons of the world. I just want to see [the rocket] go up” — a scary automaton attitude when applied to the current Trump administration.

After Musk bought Twitter, Steve reportedly slept in Twitter headquarters with his newborn baby. According to court filings, as Twitter fired thousands of workers and refused to pay them money they were owed, Steve pushed workers to violate rent contracts and demanded they violate local permitting laws — all to meet Musk’s cost-cutting goal.

When Musk turned to investing hundreds of millions in Donald Trump’s candidacy, Davis moved to Pennsylvania. The games quickly began with an arguably illegal million-dollar daily giveaway to swing-state voters and handouts of $47 for signers of a petition.

A tragedy in this moment is that Steve’s loyalty to Musk is blinding him from seeing what’s before his eyes: The rules of the DOGE game are ridiculous. They increase inefficiency, and they make people’s lives worse.

Suppose it costs $10 to fill a giant pothole. This fix could prevent thousands of dollars in damage for family cars and business delivery trucks. That’s the definition of efficiency and a great use of government money for the common good. But in Musk’s DOGE game, the only thing that counts is reducing costs on the government’s balance sheet — not actually saving money for Americans.

Similarly, DOGE is firing thousands of Social Security employees, closing Social Security phone support lines, and shutting down many Social Security offices.

For millions of grandparents, this likely means checks get delayed, new applicants have trouble registering, and seniors with walkers have to physically travel long distances for the chance to get help securing their earned benefits.

Those who depend on their retirement checks to survive will suffer from increased medical bills when they cannot afford to eat or buy their medicine. Taxpayers will pay these bills via Medicare.

Adding further absurdity to the “efficiency” game, DOGE is neutering the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which stops banks and credit card companies from ripping off Americans. The CFPB has already saved Americans over $20 billion, not one iota of which gets counted in the rules of the DOGE game. (This move conveniently shoots the financial watchdog just as Elon Musk enters the financial services industry — certainly efficient for at least one billionaire.)

Add in cuts to aviation safety, food inspection, nutrition assistance for kids, veterans health care, Medicaid, and clean water. As author Ezra Klein said recently, “Efficiency of what?… I want efficiency towards an end. Towards a vision of the future that isn’t terrible.”

But Steve is focused on the game, the puzzle of it all — not the vision.

I’ve received messages of genuine sadness from those who knew Steve during more innocent times. What’s truly heartbreaking to us is that the old Steve Davis — the brilliant, creative Steve Davis — could be doing inspiring work if he had the self-assuredness to question Musk’s rules.

Picture the games that giant corporations and the ultra-wealthy play to avoid taxes, leaving the rest of us paying more. Picture congressional insider stock trading, the bloated military budget, and the corporate welfare that flows when government insiders turn into lobbyists. Picture the price gouging by credit card companies, banks, health insurance companies, and at the grocery store. Heck, even picture the millions of hours Americans lose at red traffic lights with bad timers.

Much of this could be solved by a smart engineer leveraging technology, including artificial intelligence. If solving these problems were the game, Steve’s mind could raise quality of life for millions.

But instead, we have artificial intelligence of the worst kind. Brilliance blinded by loyalty. A game out of control. And every day Donald Trump turns the keys over to Elon Musk, who then hands them to my once friend, Americans are the losers.

Adam Green is Co-Founder of the Progressive Change Institute.

More in U.S.
The Hill: California Democrats invite EPA head to witness cross-border sewage crisis firsthand
HuffPost: JB Pritzker Reveals The Talk Show Stunt Trump Wanted In Exchange For COVID Equipment

China executes four Canadians, Ottawa says

UPI

China executes four Canadians, Ottawa says

Darryl Coote – March 20, 2025

UPI
Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly, seen here speaking before the United Nations in 2023, told reporters on Parliament Hill on Wednesday that China has executed four Canadians. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI

March 20 (UPI) — China has executed four Canadians, according to Ottawa’s foreign affairs minister, who condemned Beijing for not heeding their calls for leniency.

Little is known about the executions. China’s embassy in Ottawa has yet to respond to UPI’s request for comment.

Melanie Joly, Canada’s foreign affairs minister, told reporters on Parliament Hill following a cabinet meeting Wednesday that the four people executed were dual Chinese and Canadian citizens. She said their executions were related to drug charges.

“We strongly condemn the executions that did happen against Canadians in China,” she said.

Joly said she had been following the situation “very, very closely” for months and had personally asked Beijing for leniency, as had former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he was still office.

“We made sure to press on China how much we needed to make sure that, ultimately, these Canadians would be safe,” she said.

Teams in Canada and China are supporting the families of those executed, she said, adding, “We will continue to engage with China, as we’ll continue to not only strongly condemn but also ask for leniency for other Canadians that are facing similar situations.”

She would not say how many other Canadians were facing the death penalty in China, citing requests from their families to keep information private.

It was not clear when the executions occurred.

China leads the world in executions, according to Amnesty International, which believes Beijing carries out thousands every year.

In a statement Wednesday, the international human rights organization chastised Beijing for the executions and praised Ottawa for condemning China’s actions while calling on it to do more to protect its citizens abroad

“We are devastated for the families of the victims, and we hold them in our hearts as they try to process the unimaginable,” Ketty Nivyabandi, secretary general of Amnesty International Canada, said in a statement.

“Our thoughts also go to the loved ones of Canadian citizens whom China is holding on death row or whose whereabouts in the Chinese prison system are unknown. They deserve answers and justice, not the sickening worry they have been subjected to because of years of separation and uncertainty.”

The Canada-China relationship has been publicly fraught for years.

In 2018, Canada arrested Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of Chinese telecom giant Huawei, at the request of the United States, where she was wanted on a slew of charges, including money laundering.

China, seemingly in retaliation, arrested two Canadians, Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, on espionage charges. However, they were released in September 2021, days after Meng reached a deal with U.S. prosecutors that facilitated her return to China.

More in World
AP: Zelenskyy and Putin have agreed to a limited ceasefire, but implementation is work in progress
CNN: London’s mayor: ‘Clearly a link’ between Trump and Americans wanting to become Brits

DOGE and Musk’s USAID shutdown probably violated the U.S. Constitution

Mashable

DOGE and Musk’s USAID shutdown probably violated the U.S. Constitution

Mashable – March 19, 2025

A message appears on the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) website on February 5, 2025 in San Anselmo, California.
Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what’s in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

A U.S. federal judge has ruled that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) likely violated the Constitution “in multiple ways.” While this doesn’t mean USAID is back up and running, the order does put a temporary halt to DOGE head Elon Musk‘s plans to scrap the agency.

SEE ALSO: Elon Musk killing USAID would hurt America’s future. Here’s why.

In an 68-page opinion filed in the Maryland District Court on Tuesday, judge Theodore Chuang granted a preliminary injunction preventing DOGE from further dismantling USAID. A vital foreign aid organisation, USAID offered humanitarian assistance to other countries on behalf of the U.S. government, including disaster and poverty relief. Unfortunately, billionaire Musk apparently considered such spending wastefulshutting down USAID, reportedly reducing a workforce of over 10,000 to 611, and abruptly cutting off billions in foreign aid shortly after President Donald Trump’s inauguration.

The temporary injunction doesn’t restore USAID to what it was prior to DOGE’s intervention. However, it does mean that DOGE cannot fire any more USAID employees, end its contracts or grants, or shut down its offices and IT systems. The court further ordered DOGE to reinstate all current USAID employees’ access to their email, payments, security, and other electronic systems, as well as restore deleted emails.

Why was DOGE shutting down USAID potentially unconstitutional?
Supporters of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAid) rally on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol on February 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Supporters of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAid) rally on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol on February 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Credit: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

The case was brought by 26 USAID employees and contractors, some of whom the court noted had been stranded overseas without vital security software or funds for basic living expenses when DOGE shut down USAID’s systems. In his ruling, Chuang agreed with the plaintiffs’ assessment that Musk and DOGE violated the U.S. Constitution on more than one occasion, finding that their case was likely to succeed.

Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that the Constitution’s Appointments Clause was breached because Musk operated as an Officer of the United States without being appointed as such.  The defense refuted this, claiming that Musk was merely acting in an advisory capacity, and wasn’t the one actually calling the shots. Chuang found this unconvincing.

“To deny [this claim] solely on the basis that, on paper, Musk has no formal legal authority relating to the decisions at issue, even if he is actually exercising significant authority on governmental matters, would open the door to an end-run about the Appointments Clause,” wrote Chuang.

“Musk’s public statements and posts on X, in which he has stated on multiple occasions that DOGE will take action, and such action occurred shortly thereafter, demonstrate that he has firm control over DOGE…. [T]he present record supports the conclusion that Musk, without having been duly appointed as an Officer of the United States, exercised significant authority reserved for an Officer…”

The plaintiffs further argued that Musk and DOGE breached the separation of powers because USAID is a federal agency that can only be created or abolished by Congress. As such, DOGE’s shutdown of USAID allegedly exceeded the authority of the executive branch to encroach upon the legislative branch. Chuang also considered this argument strong.

“Congress has made clear through statute its express will that USAID be an independent agency, and that it not be abolished or substantially reorganized without congressional approval,” said Chuang. “[Musk and DOGE’s] present actions to dismantle USAID violate the Separation of Powers because they contravene congressional authority relating to the establishment of an agency.”

Predictably, Musk quickly took to X to decry the rulingquestioning Chuang’s integrity as well as sharing and agreeing with posts claiming a “judicial coup.” He did not specifically address any of the legal and factual issues raised in the case.

The White House has also alleged a political motivation for the judgement, confirming that it will appeal the decision. Appearing to employ a “no you” approach to the situation, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly bizarrely accused Chuang of breaching the separation of powers himself, claiming that “rogue judges are subverting the will of the American people in their attempts to stop President Trump from carrying out his agenda.” Under U.S. law, the judiciary has the power to assess the constitutional validity of federal laws as well as the actions of the executive branch.

Elon Says He’s ‘Never Done Anything Harmful.’ Americans Disagree

Rolling Stone

Elon Says He’s ‘Never Done Anything Harmful.’ Americans Disagree

Nikki McCann Ramirez – March 19, 2025

Elon Musk, who is leading Donald Trump’s unprecedented purge of the federal workforce, claimed it doesn’t make sense that people dislike him because he’s only ever “done productive things” and has “never done anything harmful.”

Americans — to an ever increasing proportion — disagree. As tens of thousands of federal employees and their families wait in limbo to see if they will retain (or regain) their jobs, the economy takes a downturn, entitlement programs are cut or crippled, and international aid is slashed with devastating consequences, Musk and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are pissing off a lot of people. A slew of recent polling has found that an increasing majority of Americans view the billionaire and his hack-and-slash treatment of the government negatively, even if they support major reforms.

On Tuesday, a federal judge found that Musk and DOGE “likely violated the United States Constitution in multiple ways” when they shuttered the U.S. Agency for International Development, America’s foreign aid bureau, and terminated thousands of employees.

Later that day, Musk appeared on Fox News and discussed a recent string of protests as well as attacks and vandalism against Tesla vehicles and dealerships — claiming it’s happening because he and DOGE are uncovering fraud.

“It turns out, when you take away people’s, you know, the money they’re receiving fraudulently, they get very upset, and they basically want to kill me because I’m stopping their fraud, and they want to hurt Tesla because we’re stopping this, this terrible waste and corruption in the government,” Musk said, adding: “Bad people will do bad things.”

Of course, Musk and DOGE have found exceedingly little fraud. They have, however, helped purge tens of thousands of federal workers, threatening the stability of essential government services like Social Security — while also moving to make it harder for seniors to access their benefits.

At one point in the interview, Musk — who recently threatened to fire every federal worker who ignores his HR emails — demanded more empathy from Democrats amid the attacks on Tesla. “It’s really come as quite a shock to me that there’s this level of hatred and violence from the left,” he told Sean Hannity. “I thought the left Democrats were supposed to be the party of empathy, the party of caring, and yet they’re burning down cars. They’re firebombing dealerships. They’re firing bullets into dealerships.”

He continued: “Tesla is a peaceful company. We’ve never done anything harmful. I’ve never done anything harmful. I’ve only done productive things. So I think we just have a deranged — there’s some kind of mental illness thing going on here, because this doesn’t make any sense.”

Former employees of Musk’s companiesgovernment regulators, several of his ex-partners, his children, and the virtual sea of people being negatively affected by Musk’s work as an unelected shadow-president might disagree with the notion that the billionaire has “never done anything harmful,” and some are making themselves heard.

On Tuesday, Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) was confronted by furious constituents at a town hall in his home district, including with questions about Musk’s conflicts of interests. Musk’s company SpaceX has received billions in contracts from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Trump administration is moving to incorporate Starlink, Musk’s satellite internet business, throughout the federal government.

“What makes you think that [Musk] has no conflict of interest?” one person asked Flood. “Do you think he would cut that before he would cut our Medicare or our Social Security or our jobs?”

Flood responded that he remained in full “support [of] Elon Musk, and the Department of Government Efficiency.” To which the room exploded into a chorus of boos and jeers against the Nebraska representative.

Flood is not the only lawmaker facing furious voters, to the point that earlier this month the National Republican Congressional Committee advised members of the GOP to just stop holding town halls. GOP leaders have — as is routine these days — accused critics of being paid protesters as a way of dismissing their constituents’ concerns. Musk has capitalized on the allegation.

“There are larger forces at work as well,” he told Hannity on Tuesday, speaking about the Tesla attacks and protests. “I don’t know who’s funding it and who’s coordinating it, because this is, this is crazy. I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Hannity lamented that the people who worked for Tesla could potentially “lose their jobs.” Yet neither he nor Musk bothered to spare an empathetic thought for the thousands of Americans DOGE rendered unemployed the last two months, and the potentially devastating domestic and international ramifications of his corrupt political project.

More in Politics
The Daily Beast: White House Handed Intel Blowing Up Trump’s Key Claim about Russia
The Independent: Another federal judge accuses Trump of flouting his court order — this time over federal firings

Trump’s bluntness powered a White House comeback. Now his words are getting him in trouble in court

Associated Press

Trump’s bluntness powered a White House comeback. Now his words are getting him in trouble in court

Chris Megerian and Lindsay Whitehurst – March 19, 2025

President Donald Trump greets Ireland’s Prime Minister Micheál Martin as he arrives at the West Wing of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, March 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Elon Musk flashes his t-shirt that reads “DOGE” to the media as he walks on South Lawn of the White House, in Washington, Sunday, March 9, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk speak to reporters near a red Model S Tesla vehicle on the South Lawn of the White House Tuesday, March 11, 2025, in Washington. (Pool via AP)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump’s shoot-from-the-lip style kept Americans on the edge of their seats during last year’s campaign. But now that he’s speaking as a president and not as a candidate, his words are being used against him in court in the blizzard of litigation challenging his agenda.

The spontaneity is complicating his administration’s legal positions. Nowhere has this been clearer than in cases involving his adviser Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency, the driving force in his efforts to downsize and overhaul the federal government.

The latest example came earlier this week when U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang ruled that Musk had likely violated the Constitution by dismantling the United States Agency for International Development.

The lawsuit turned on the question of whether the billionaire entrepreneur had overstepped his authority. Justice Department lawyers and White House officials insist that Musk is merely a presidential adviser, not the actual leader of DOGE.

But Trump has said otherwise — in speeches, interviews and public remarks — and Chuang quoted him extensively in his decision.

Trump most notably boasted of creating DOGE during his prime-time address to a joint session of Congress and said it was “headed by Elon Musk.” Republicans gave Musk a standing ovation, and he saluted from the gallery above the House chamber.

“Trump’s words were essential, central and indispensable,” said Norm Eisen, one of the lawyers for USAID employees who filed the lawsuit. “His admissions took what would have been a tough case and made it into a straightforward one.”

The looseness with words is a shift from predecessors like Democratic President Barack Obama, who used to say that he was careful because anything he said could send troops marching or markets tumbling.

Trump has no such feeling of restraint, and neither do other members of his Republican administration such as Musk.

Chuang, who is based in Maryland and was nominated by Obama, also cited social media posts from Musk, who writes frequently on X, the platform that he owns.

For example, Musk posted “we spent the weekend feeding USAID to the woodchipper” on Feb. 3. The agency was being brought to a standstill at that time, with staff furloughed, spending halted and headquarters shut down.

“Musk’s public statements and posts … suggest that he has the ability to cause DOGE to act,” Chuang wrote in his ruling.

Harrison Fields, principal deputy press secretary at the White House, said Trump was fulfilling his campaign promise “to make the federal government more efficient and accountable to taxpayers.”

“Rogue bureaucrats and activist judges attempting to undermine this effort are only subverting the will of the American people and their obstructionist efforts will fail,” he said.

Anthony Coley, who led public affairs at the Justice Department during Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration, said statements involving civil litigation were always coordinated between his office and the West Wing.

“The words could be used to support what we’re doing or undermine what we’re doing,” he said. “It’s a carefully choreographed effort to make sure there was no daylight between what was said in the court of public opinion and what could ultimately play out in the court of law.”

In comparison to how things were done in the past, Coley said, Trump has a “ready-fire-aim approach of doing business.”

Trump doesn’t usually let legal disputes force him to turn down the volume. During a criminal investigation over his decision to keep classified records at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida after leaving the White House in 2021, Trump spoke extensively about the case in an interview with Fox News.

Longtime defense lawyers were startled because defendants are usually encouraged to keep mum while facing an indictment. But the situation panned out for Trump. His legal team delayed the case, and the special counsel’s office dropped the charges after Trump won the election last November — presidents can’t be prosecuted while in office.

DOGE has been the focus of nearly two dozen lawsuits. It’s often prevailed so far in cases involving access to government data, where several plaintiffs have struggled to convince judges to block the organization’s actions.

But it’s also run into challenges, such as a lawsuit over whether DOGE must comply with public records requests. The Trump administration asserted in court that DOGE is part of the White House, meaning it’s exempt.

Judge Christopher Cooper, also nominated by Obama, disagreed, siding with a government watchdog group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW.

“Musk and the President’s public statements indicate that USDS” — the original acronym for the organization that was renamed as DOGE — “is in fact exercising substantial independent authority,” wrote Cooper, who is based in Washington.

Cooper concluded that DOGE can “identify and terminate federal employees, federal programs, and federal contracts. Doing any of those three things would appear to require substantial independent authority; to do all three surely does.”

He ordered DOGE to start responding to requests about the team’s role in mass firings and disruptions to federal programs. The administration unsuccessfully asked the judge to reconsider, saying the judge “fundamentally misapprehended” the agency’s structure.

The cases are still in their early stages, and the novel legal questions they’re raising will take time for the courts to consider, said Michael Fragoso, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and former chief counsel to Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

“What Elon does on Twitter is not necessarily what DOGE does,” he said. “My hope would be courts take the time to sift between those two.”

Just because Musk claims credit online for deep agency cuts, that doesn’t necessarily translate to DOGE having authority in the eyes of the law, Stanford Law School professor Michael McConnell argued in a recent debate on the issue.

DOGE is recommending changes, he said, but it’s the agency heads who are actually putting them into effect.

More in Politics
The Independent: Republican senators want Elon Musk and DOGE to stay away from Social Security, according to new report
The Daily Beast: White House Handed Intel Blowing Up Trump’s Key Claim about Russia
Politico: If Trump Defies the Courts, Here’s What a Judge Can Do

DOGE Wants to Cripple Social Security Phone Services

Rolling Stone

DOGE Wants to Cripple Social Security Phone Services

Nikki McCann Ramirez – March 18, 2025

Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is planning to restructure the Social Security Administration’s phone support services in a move that could force millions of seniors to require in-person services from the already understaffed agency.

According to a leaked memo obtained by Popular Information and later reported by Axios, Acting Deputy SSA Commissioner Doris Diaz proposed adding additional online identity verification to Social Security claims processing in an effort to clamp down on alleged payment fraud. In reality, Social Security fraud is quite rare, affecting less than 1 percent of payments between 2015-2022. By Diaz’s own admission, the additional identity verification could cause increased wait times, and potentially delay or deny services to vulnerable seniors.

In the leaked memo, Diaz suggests that the SSA use “current internet identity proofing, for agency benefits claims and direct deposit changes done over the phone. For instances where a customer is unable to utilize the internet ID proofing, customers will be required to visit a field office to provide in-person identifying documentation.”

Social Security recipients are already required to go through an identity verification process if they utilize the agency’s phone service, and discrepancies are typically resolved by mailing copies of identifying documents to the SSA for verification. A former SSA official told Axios that the memo was crafted at DOGE’s request.

Requiring in-person verification would, as Diaz herself wrote, result in “75,000-85,000 additional visitors per week” to SSA offices, “longer wait times and processing time,” “increased challenges for vulnerable populations,” a higher demand for “resources, staff, and systems updates,” and “increased costs for identity proofing services and potential budget shortfalls.”

Sounds awful, so why do it? Well, the most likely result would be that thousands of people — either through delays, roadblocks, or inability to access in-person services — will stop receiving social security payments. Fewer payments mean less spending on Social Security, and that’s ultimately the Trump administration’s goal.

Last week, amid rumors that SSA telephone services would be cut off entirely, the agency issued a press release stating that phone services would remain available. “SA is increasing its protection for America’s seniors and other beneficiaries by eliminating the risk of fraud associated with changing bank account information by telephone,” the agency wrote.

DOGE’s incursion into the SSA has already wreaked havoc on the agency. Musk has accused the program of being “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time,” and falsely claimed that millions of payments are going out to dead individuals who are over 120 years old. Ten SSA field offices have already been shut down by DOGE, and Musk is floating over $700 billion in cuts to entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicaid, Medicaid.

As previously reported by Rolling Stonethe Trump administration is also planning to offload the cost of overpayments and other errors made by SSA officials onto the seniors who receive them. Earlier this month, interim SSA chief Leland Dudek announced that the agency would be increasing the amount of money it withheld from social security recipients who had been overpaid from 10-100 percent — potentially their entire check. For the millions of elderly Americans who rely on social security to make ends meet, an error made by the government could result in a devastating penalty.

Essentially, the Trump administration’s plan to cut back on Social Security seems to be focused on making it more difficult to access benefits, and increasing the amount of money they can withhold from recipients.

Questions also remain about what kind of access Musk and DOGE have to the troves of sensitive personal data housed and managed by the SSA. In February, Acting Social Security Commissioner Michelle King stepped down from her post after refusing to provide representatives from DOGE access to systems containing sensitive recipient data. Similar conflicts have taken place at other agencies, including the treasury.

On Tuesday, top Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued a letter demanding that Musk and the Trump administration comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for “details on who really is in charge at DOGE, the scope of its authority to shutter federal agencies and get rid of more than 100,000 federal employees, the extent of its access to the government’s most sensitive databases, and whether DOGE is serving the interests of the American people or the interests of Mr. Musk’s companies and his foreign customers.”

“By filing these FOIA requests, which every American has the right to make in order to demand transparency from our government,” wrote Ranking Members Gerald Connolly (D-Va.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). “The President, Mr. Musk, and DOGE can and will be held accountable to the American people, the original and ultimate source of all sovereign power in the United States of America.”

Proposed Trump policy could force thousands of citizens applying for Social Security benefits to verify their identities in person

Fortune

Proposed Trump policy could force thousands of citizens applying for Social Security benefits to verify their identities in person

Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez – March 18, 2025

U.S. President Donald Trump (left) and Elon Musk speak in the White House on March 14, 2025.

Trump’s Social Security Administration proposed a major change that could force thousands of people every week to show up at a shrinking list of field offices before they can receive benefits.

In an effort to combat fraud, the SSA has suggested that citizens applying for Social Security or disability benefits over the phone would also need to, for the first time, verify their identities using an online program called “internet ID proofing,” according to an internal memo viewed by the Washington Post.

If they can’t verify their identity online, they will have to file paperwork at their nearest field office, according to the memo sent last week by Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations Doris Diaz to Acting Social Security Commissioner Leland Dudek.

The memo acknowledged the potential change could force an estimated 75,000 to 85,000 people per week to seek out field offices to confirm their identities and could lead to “increased challenges for vulnerable populations,” “longer wait times and processing time,” and “increased demand for office appointments,” the memo read, according to the Post.

The change would disproportionately affect older populations who may not be internet savvy, and those with disabilities. Claimants seeking a field office will also have fewer to choose from, as more than 40 of 1,200 are estimated to close, the New York Times reported, citing advocacy group Social Security Works. The list of offices slated to close is based on an unreliable list released by DOGE, according to Social Security Works. Elon Musk’s DOGE has also said it will cut 7,000 of the SSA’s 57,000 employees.

The White House and the Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

The SSA previously considered scrapping telephone service for claims, the Post reported, but backtracked after a report by the outlet. Regardless, the SSA said claimants looking to change their bank account information will now need to do so either online or in-person and could no longer do so over the phone.

Almost every transaction at a field office requires an appointment that already takes months to realize, according to the Post. 

The White House has repeatedly said it will not cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits, and has said any changes are to cut back on fraud. A July 2024 report from the Social Security Administration’s inspector general estimated that between fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2022, the SSA sent out $8.6 trillion in disbursements. Fewer than 1% of the disbursements, or $71.8 billion worth, were improper payments, according to the report.

Acting Social Security Commissioner Dudek said for phone calls, the agency is “exploring ways to implement AI—in a safe, governed manner in accordance with” guidance from the Office of Management and Budget “to streamline and improve call resolution,” according to a Tuesday memo obtained by NBC News.

Dudek mentioned in the memo that the agency has been frequently mentioned in the media, which has been stressing out employees.

“Over the past month, this agency has seen an unprecedented level of media coverage, some of it true and deserved, while some has not been factual and painted the agency in a very negative light,” he wrote. “I know this has been stressful for you and has caused disruption in your life. Personally, I have made some mistakes, which makes me human like you. I promise you this, I will continue to make mistakes, but I will learn from them. My decisions will always be with the best intentions for this agency, the people we serve, and you.”