Shooting down Russia’s overhyped missiles with Patriots is a win for more than just Ukraine. The war is an ‘intelligence bonanza’ for the West.

Business Insider

Shooting down Russia’s overhyped missiles with Patriots is a win for more than just Ukraine. The war is an ‘intelligence bonanza’ for the West.

Chris Panella – January 5, 2024

The Patriot missile system is a ground-based, mobile missile-defense interceptor deployed by the US.U.S. Army Security Assistance Command
Shooting down Russia’s overhyped missiles with Patriots is a win for more than just Ukraine. The war is an ‘intelligence bonanza’ for the West.
  • Ukraine says it has shot down 25 Russian Kinzhal missiles with Patriot systems since last May.
  • Any such kill improves the Patriot’s accuracy and algorithms, benefiting other users of the system.
  • It’s invaluable intelligence for the West and further highlights the need for more air defenses.

Ukraine’s made good use of its Western-provided Patriot air-defense systems, shooting down plenty of Russian missiles, aircraft, and drones, including some advanced, albeit overhyped, weaponry.

But the intercepts, while a win for Ukraine, are also gathering hoards of data for other Patriot operators, making the system smarter and better. It’s just one example of how the war in Ukraine is, as one missile-defense expert told Business Insider, an “intelligence bonanza.”

And as Ukraine defeats threats, there’s also a growing recognition of the importance of robust air and missile defenses, vital for defending and deterrence and, in Ukraine’s case, survival amid an increase in missile and drone attacks.

On Tuesday, Ukraine said it shot down all 10 of the new Kinzhals fired during a vicious air assault, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine praising the incident as “what heroism supplied with advanced systems looks like.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, too, hailed Western-provided air defenses like Patriots, IRIS-T, and NASAMS for saving “hundreds of lives.”

The reported kills nearly doubled the tally of Kinzhals destroyed in the war. Just Sunday, Ukraine said it had shot down 15 Kinzhal missiles using Patriot batteries since the first recorded intercept last May, which was confirmed by the Pentagon.

Serviceman patrols in front of the Patriot air defence system during Polish military training on the missile systems at the airport in Warsaw, Poland February 7, 2023.
The Patriot air-defence system during Polish military training at the airport in Warsaw, Poland, in February of last year.REUTERS/Kacper Pempel

A Ukrainian Air Force spokesperson, Col. Yurii Ihnat, praised the Patriot’s ability to counter a variety of missile threats. The rate at which the Patriot may have intercepted Kinzhals indicates Ukraine has learned well how to operate its Western air defenses and developed a strong defense against the missile the Russians have touted as an unstoppable hypersonic weapon.

But Ukraine is not the only one benefiting from these engagements. For other Patriot operators, such as the US, new data about how to counter specific threats, such as the Kinzhal, is incredibly useful information.

“Every Ukrainian downing of Russian hypersonic Kh-47M2 Kinzhal with the Patriot missiles will improve the Patriot missile intercept algorithm — and increase accuracy for all Patriot systems, a benefit for the US, the rest of NATO, and other Patriot AD users,” Jan Kallberg, a senior fellow with the Transatlantic Defense and Security program at the Center for European Policy Analysis who was a professor at West Point, posted on X.

That data is valuable for both the US and its NATO allies, giving them a rare opportunity to live test systems and learn more about how not only to engage but also defeat Russian weaponry.

“The larger point is the intelligence bonanza that we are capitalizing on by observing or capturing Russian systems” without actually having any troops on the ground, Tom Karako, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies who’s the director of the Missile Defense Project there, told Business Insider. He said the opportunity was giving the US valuable data on Russia for potential future conflicts.

patriot
US soldiers with the 3rd Battalion of the 2nd Air Defense Artillery Regiment after a routine inspection of a Patriot missile battery at a military base in Gaziantep, Turkey.US Army photo

Russia’s Kinzhal is an advanced air-launched ballistic missile that has been celebrated by Kremlin officials, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, for its “unique flight characteristics,” high speed, maneuverability, and ability to “overcome all existing” and “prospective antiaircraft and antimissile defense systems,” characteristics that supposedly make it unbeatable.

The MIM-104 “Patriot” air-defense battery, an older system that first entered service in the 1980s but has nonetheless been praised by the Pentagon as “one of the world’s most advanced air-defense systems,” arrived on the battlefield in April 2023. The system, once operational, quickly put an end to Russian narratives about the Kinzhal, shooting one down in early May.

Later that month, Ukraine said its Patriot air defenses eliminated six more of these missiles.

The Kinzhal is an advanced capability, but so far, it hasn’t really lived up to its overhyped narrative of being an unstoppable hypersonic missile.

“The Kinzhal doesn’t fit into the category of either a scramjet cruise missile or a hypersonic boost-glide vehicle,” Karako explained.

He added that the term “hypersonic,” when used to refer to the Kinzhal missile, tended to be in a more literal sense, as in it could exceed speeds of Mach 5, or five times the speed of sound.

But while the Kinzhal is going fast, “it doesn’t really constitute sustained and controlled flight in the hypersonic flight regime,” Karako explained, adding that “it’s essentially a somewhat maneuvering ballistic missile.”

Maj. Peter Mitchell, an air-defense officer who’s an instructor at West Point, previously characterized Russia’s Kinzhal as “more akin to a giant lawn dart loaded with explosives,” saying it wasn’t capable of sharp turns or quick changes in flight direction.

That doesn’t mean Ukraine’s reported wins aren’t impressive — or that it’s not a boon for the US and its partners to see Russia use the Kinzhal. Instead, it’s quite the opposite.

Similar to just about any data collected in the war, whether it’s information on how Russia’s operating its Shahed one-way exploding drones, defending against Ukrainian strikes, or pounding Ukrainian defenses, the takeaway is a beneficial one for the West: By helping defend Ukraine, they learn more about how their enemy could fight them in the future.

The Patriot system firing in Greece in November 2017 as part of a NATO exercise.
The Patriot system firing in Greece in November 2017 as part of a NATO exercise.Sebastian Apel/U.S. Department of Defense, via AP

Ukraine’s successes with the Patriot and other Western systems also highlight the enormous importance of air and missile defenses.

While the drone war being fought between Ukraine and Russia has been eye-opening for many armies, including the US, the air campaigns have also reinforced the realization of how much armed forces need robust air defenses.

The successful engagement of “high-end missile threats from a major power like Russia is ratifying and bolstering the demand signal for both the Patriot family and other air defenses more broadly,” Karako said.

During his December visit to Washington to plead for more aid amid Republican roadblocks in Congress, Zelenskyy expressed a dire need for more Patriot batteries in Ukraine. But the demand goes beyond that.

Take, for example, recent news of a handful of NATO nations’ plans to buy 1,000 Patriot missiles or Japan’s landmark decision to remove its self-imposed ban on weapons exports to transfer dozens of missiles to the US. Other air-defense systems, too, have been prioritized, as seen in the US aid packages to Israel in recent months.

“We’re seeing an increased salience and demand for air and missile defense because missiles have become ‘weapons of choice,'” Karako said. He said air and missile defense was not a peripheral concern but rather a central concern.

Houthis launch sea drone to attack ships hours after US, allies issue final warning

Associated Press

Houthis launch sea drone to attack ships hours after US, allies issue final warning

Tara Copp – January 4, 2024

FILE – U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, who heads the Navy’s Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, speaks at an event at the International Defense Exhibition and Conference in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Feb. 21, 2023. The top commander of U.S. naval forces in the Middle East says Yemen’s Houthi rebels are showing no signs of ending their “reckless” attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea. But Vice Adm. Brad Cooper said in an Associated Press interview on Saturday that more nations are joining the international maritime mission to protect vessels in the vital waterway and trade traffic is beginning to pick up. (AP Photo/Jon Gambrell, File)More

WASHINGTON (AP) — An armed unmanned surface vessel launched from Houthi-controlled Yemen got within a “couple of miles” of U.S. Navy and commercial vessels in the Red Sea before detonating on Thursday, just hours after the White House and a host of partner nations issued a final warning to the Iran-backed militia group to cease the attacks or face potential military action.

Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, the head of U.S. Navy operations in the Middle East, said it was the first time the Houthis had used an unmanned surface vessel, or USV, since their harassment of commercial ships in the Red Sea began after the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war. They have, however, used them in years past.

Fabian Hinz, a missile expert and research fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said the USV’s are a key part of the Houthi maritime arsenal and were used during previous battles against the Saudi coalition forces that intervened in Yemen’s war. They have regularly been used as suicide drone boats that explode upon impact.

Most of the Houthis’ USVs are likely assembled in Yemen but often fitted with components made in Iran, such as computerized guidance systems, Hinz said.

At the United Nations, U.S. deputy ambassador Christopher Lu said at a emergency Security Council meeting on Wednesday that Iran has supplied the Houthis with money and advanced weapons systems, including drones, land attack cruise missiles and ballistic missiles. He said Iran also has been deeply involved in planning the Houthis’ attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea.

He said the United States isn’t seeking a confrontation with Iran, but Tehran has a choice.

“It can continue its current course,” Lu said, “or it can withhold its support without which the Houthis would struggle to effectively track and strike commercial vessels navigating shipping lanes through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.”

This raises questions as to whether any action against the Houthis would also address Iran’s role in any way, which could risk widening the conflict.

A statement Wednesday signed by the United States, Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore and the United Kingdom gave the Houthis what a senior Biden administration official described as a final warning.

“Let our message now be clear: we call for the immediate end of these illegal attacks and release of unlawfully detained vessels and crews,” the countries said in the statement. “The Houthis will bear the responsibility of the consequences should they continue to threaten lives, the global economy, and free flow of commerce in the region’s critical waterways.”

Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder would not say whether any military action would follow Thursday’s launch of the sea drone.

″I’ll let the statement speak for itself, which, again, represented many nations around the world and highlighted that if these strikes don’t stop, there will be consequences,” Ryder said.

Since late October, the Houthis have launched scores of one-way attack drones and missiles at commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea. U.S. Navy warships have also intercepted ballistic missiles the Pentagon says were headed toward Israel. Cooper said a total of 61 missiles and drones have been shot down by U.S. warships.

In response to the Houthi attacks, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in December announced Operation Prosperity Guardian, with the United States and other countries sending additional ships to the southern Red Sea to provide protection for commercial vessels passing through the critical Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

Cooper said 1,500 commercial ships have been able to transit safely since the operation was launched on Dec. 18.

However, the Houthis have continued to launch missiles and attack drones, prompting the White House and 12 allies to issue what amounted to a final warning Wednesday to cease their attacks on vessels in the Red Sea or face potential targeted military action.

Cooper said Operation Prosperity Guardian was solely defensive in nature and separate from any military action the U.S. might take if the Houthi attacks continue.

The U.S., United Kingdom and France are providing most of the warships now, and Greece and Denmark will also be providing vessels, he said.

Associated Press writer Jack Jeffery in London and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Not just command post: Russian defense system damaged in Crimea

Ukrayinska Pravda

Not just command post: Russian defense system damaged in Crimea

Ukrainska Pravda – January 5, 2024

Photo: Crimean Wind on Telegram
Photo: Crimean Wind on Telegram

The attack on Russia’s military facilities in occupied Crimea on 4 January destroyed not only a command post but also severely damaged the Russian defense system on the peninsula. Ukraine’s Defense Forces also targeted the new deployment of Shahed kamikaze UAVs on the peninsula.

Source: Nataliia Humeniuk, Head of the Joint Press Centre for Operational Command Pivden (South), in a comment to Suspilne, Ukraine’s public broadcaster

Quote: “Not only was a command post hit, but a serious combat activity took place over the past 24 hours, including severe damage to the defence system on the Crimean Peninsula.”

Details: Humeniuk says this is not the first such case that prompted the Russians to seriously reshape their defence system.

“They are now once again experiencing the same hysteria with relocations, trying to manoeuvre and place both the defence systems and the assets they protect in other places,” the official said.

Furthermore, Humeniuk noted that the Russian military has recently relocated launch sites for the Shahed UAVs. Although they mostly used Cape Chauda before, some launches were recorded near the settlement of Balaklava after several high-impact strikes by the Ukrainian forces.

“This is the focus of the Defence Forces’ efforts, to make the enemy not feel so safe in these areas and to always remember that Crimea is Ukrainian, and we are fighting for it,” she said.

The official also believes that the explosions near the Crimean Bridge are more of a smokescreen, “an attempt to protect this redundant configuration target.”

Quote from Humeniuk: “However, the very concern and fears for its fate are not groundless. Our combat work is ongoing, there are still many sites we need to deal with. And we will definitely report on every tangible result if it is worthy of announcement.”

Details: A resident of the village of Lisnivka, Yevpatoriia district (formerly Sakskyi district), told Suspilne.Krym that he had heard four strong explosions at different intervals late on the evening of 4 January, which shook the windows.

“I heard four explosions at different intervals at night. I heard the first two at 21:30, then two more around 23:00. The explosions were intense, the windows were shaking,” he said.

Background:

  • On 4 January, powerful explosions struck the cities of Yevpatoriia and Sevastopol (Crimea). The traffic on the Crimean Bridge was suspended at the time. One of the Ukrainian missiles hit the command post in Yukharyna Balka airfield in Sevastopol.
  • The Office of Strategic Communications of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine confirmed the damage to the command post in Sevastopol. Mykola Oleshchuk, Commander of the Ukrainian Air Force, praised the Ukrainian pilots and everyone involved in planning the operation in occupied Crimea on 4 January for their “impeccable combat work”.
  • At the same time, the Atesh military partisan movement reported that the Ukrainian forces, following a tip-off from the partisans, also struck a Russian military unit in Yevpatoriia, where the Russians had moved their radar systems.
  • Mikhail Razvozhayev, Russian-appointed sham “governor” of Sevastopol, claimed that one person was injured when the wreckage crashed into a house, and that missile wreckage fell on different streets.
  • In the late evening of 4 January, reports circulated of explosions in the Kerch Strait area, repulsion of attacks near Sevastopol, evacuation of a hundred people, and strikes near the town of Saky.
  • On 4 January, the Russian Defence Ministry claimed that ten missiles had been shot down over Crimea and one drone over the Black Sea, while on the night of 4-5 January, another 36 drones had supposedly been shot down over the peninsula.

Trump lawyer for saying Brett Kavanaugh “quid pro quo part out loud”

Salon

“Unprofessional”: Experts blast Trump lawyer for saying Brett Kavanaugh “quid pro quo part out loud”

Igor Derysh – January 5, 2024

Alina Habba ANNA WATTS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Alina Habba ANNA WATTS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Trump attorney Alina Habba on Thursday suggested that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh would “step up” and rule in favor of the former president because he “fought for” him.

Trump on Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Colorado Supreme Court ruling barring him from the presidential primary ballot under the Constitution’s “insurrectionist” clause. Trump has privately told people that he thinks the Supreme Court will “overwhelmingly” overturn the ruling but has also expressed concern that the conservative justices he appointed “will worry about being perceived as ‘political’ and may rule against him,” according to The New York Times.

Habba echoed Trump’s worries in an interview with Fox News.

“That’s a concern that he’s voiced to me, he’s voiced to everybody publicly, not privately. And I can tell you that his concern is a valid one,” she said. “They’re trying so hard to look neutral that sometimes they make the wrong call.”

But in a later appearance on the network with host Sean Hannity, Habba said the case should be a “slam dunk in the Supreme Court.”

“You know people like Kavanaugh ― who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place ― he’ll step up,” she said. “Those people will step up. Not because they’re pro-Trump but because they’re pro-law. Because they’re pro-fairness, and the law on this is very clear.”

CNN host Phil Mattingly was taken aback as he played the clip on Friday.

“If a Democrat said that about the Justice Department or Merrick Garland or fill-in-the-blank here, there would be an absolute implosion. That’s bonkers,” he said.

“She’s saying the quiet part out loud,” replied panelist Jon Avlon. “She’s saying that Brett Kavanaugh will step up and side with the president because he appointed him. That goes against every basic idea of law and independence of the judiciary. And frankly, it puts Kavanaugh in a bit of a box.”

Legal experts skewered the lawyers’ Fox News remarks.

“That’s not how this works,” tweeted national security attorney Bradley Moss. “Imagine for a second if a lawyer for Clinton, Obama or Biden said this. It’d be a massive scandal at Fox,” he added. 

“Alina Habba saying the quid pro quo part out loud here,” wrote MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang.

“Yet another example of Habba demonstrating how unprofessional she is as an attorney,” national security lawyer Mark Zaid added.

US Supreme Court to hear Trump appeal of Colorado ballot disqualification

Reuters

US Supreme Court to hear Trump appeal of Colorado ballot disqualification

Andrew Chung and John Kruzel – January 5, 2024

FILE PHOTO: Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Trump campaigns in Reno

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear Donald Trump‘s appeal of a judicial decision barring the former president from Colorado’s Republican primary ballot, taking up a politically explosive case with major implications for the 2024 presidential election.

At issue is the Colorado Supreme Court’s Dec. 19 ruling disqualifying Trump from the state’s primary ballot based on language in the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment for engaging in insurrection, involving the Jan. 6, 2021, attack by his supporters on the U.S. Capitol.

The justices took up the case with unusual speed. Trump, the frontrunner for his party’s nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election, filed his appeal on Wednesday. The justices indicated they would fast-track a decision, scheduling oral arguments for Feb. 8. The Colorado Republican primary is scheduled for March 5.

The state court, acting in a challenge to Trump by Republican and unaffiliated voters in Colorado, found him ineligible for the presidency under a constitutional provision that bars anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding public office, barring him from the primary ballot.

The U.S. Supreme Court did not act on a separate appeal of the state court’s decision by the Colorado Republican Party.

The Colorado case thrusts the Supreme Court – whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump – into the unprecedented and politically fraught effort by his detractors to invalidate his campaign to reclaim the White House.

Trump’s spokesperson Steven Cheung praised the court’s decision to hear the case, characterizing the disqualification efforts as “part of a well-funded effort by left-wing political activists hell-bent on stopping the lawful re-election of President Trump this November, even if it means disenfranchising voters.”

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said people in her state and around the United States “deserve clarity on whether someone who engaged in insurrection may run for the country’s highest office.”

Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group representing the challengers to Trump, added, “We’re glad that the Supreme Court will definitively decide whether Donald Trump can be on the ballot. We look forward to presenting our case and ensuring the Constitution is upheld.”

Many Republicans have decried the disqualification drive as election interference, while proponents of disqualification have said holding Trump constitutionally accountable for an insurrection supports democratic values. Trump faces criminal charges in two cases related to his efforts to overturn his 2020 loss to Biden.

Trump also has appealed to a Maine state court a decision by that state’s top election official barring him from the primary ballot under the same constitutional provision at issue in Colorado.

HIGH STAKES FOR SUPREME COURT

While the Colorado case could hamper Trump’s bid to win back the presidency, it also has major implications for the justices. Given the political nature of the dispute, they run the risk of appearing partisan whichever way they lean.

Their action will shape a wider effort to disqualify Trump from other state ballots. Colorado and Maine are Democratic-leaning states. Nonpartisan political analysts forecast that both are unlikely to back a Republican presidential candidate in the general election. But there are efforts underway in other states – including highly competitive Michigan – that could shape the election’s outcome.

The Colorado ruling marked the first time that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment – the so-called disqualification clause – was used to deem a presidential candidate ineligible. Section 3 bars from holding office any “officer of the United States” who took an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States” and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

The amendment was ratified in the aftermath of the American Civil War of 1861-1865 in which Southern states that allowed the practice of slavery rebelled in a bid for secession.

Among other arguments, Trump’s lawyers have said that Section 3 does not apply to U.S. presidents, that the question of presidential eligibility is reserved to Congress, and that he did not participate in an insurrection.

The Colorado court’s decision marked “the first time in the history of the United States that the judiciary has prevented voters from casting ballots for the leading major-party presidential candidate,” Trump’s appeal stated.

The Republican and unaffiliated voters who sued to disqualify Trump from the ballot disagreed. In a filing on Thursday, they emphasized the lower court’s findings that Trump’s intentional “mobilizing, inciting, and encouraging” of an armed mob to attack the Capitol meets the legal definition in Section 3.

“This attack was an ‘insurrection’ against the Constitution by any standard,” they said in the filing.

Trump’s supporters attacked the Capitol in a bid to prevent Congress from certifying Biden’s election victory. Trump gave an incendiary speech before the attack, repeating his false claims of widespread voting fraud.

Biden in a speech in Pennsylvania on Friday cast Trump as a threat to American democracy, one of the themes of his re-election campaign. Biden specifically made reference to Trump’s speech before the Capitol riot, whose three-year anniversary is on Saturday.

(Reporting by John Kruzel in Washington and Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)

“No shame. No decency”: Experts shocked at “weakness” of Trump’s bizarre Supreme Court ballot appeal

Salon

“No shame. No decency”: Experts shocked at “weakness” of Trump’s bizarre Supreme Court ballot appeal

Igor Derysh – January 4, 2024

Donald Trump Scott Olson/Getty Images
Donald Trump Scott Olson/Getty Images

Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday appealed the Colorado ruling barring him from the state’s primary ballot to the Supreme Court.

The Colorado Supreme Court last month found that Trump engaged in an insurrection on Jan. 6 and was barred from appearing on the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — a post-Civil War provision barring insurrectionists from office.

Trump’s lawyers in a filing asked the U.S. Supreme Court to put his name back on the ballot, arguing it would “mark the first time in the history of the United States that the judiciary has prevented voters from casting ballots for the leading major-party presidential candidate.”

Trump’s team called on the court to “return the right to vote for their candidate of choice to the voters,” arguing that only Congress has the authority to determine who is eligible for the presidency.

Trump’s team also disputed that he engaged in insurrection, citing a “long history of political protests that have turned violent.”

Legal experts criticized Trump’s filing starting with the very first line, which noted that it is a “fundamental principle” of the Constitution that “the people should choose whom they please to govern them.”

“No shame. No decency,” tweeted former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, alluding to Trump’s own efforts to disenfranchise voters after his 2020 loss.

“The sort of gall that the brief represents, it’s really, I think, shocking,” former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who served on special counsel Bob Mueller’s team, told MSNBC. “It’s really sort of beyond the pale and legally wrong.”

“Donald Trump is charged with, essentially, disenfranchising, trying to disenfranchise 80 million people,” Weissmann said.

Conservative attorney George Conway went through the indictment on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Thursday.

“This is a bizarre document, and I think it reflects the weakness of Trump’s position,” he said.

“He is throwing stuff up at the wall, or throwing stuff up in a zoo cage, and seeing what would stick,” Conway said, noting that Trump lacks “real appellate advocates” on his legal team and that the filing is effectively “channeling Trump’s narcissism.”

“The third reason, I think, is the fundamental weakness of his position. The fifth point in this brief, point five, Roman numeral five, is he didn’t engage in insurrection. It is not number one. The reason is, it’s because his arguments are very, very weak. If you look at the question in terms of President Trump should be removed from the ballot, it’s kind of a shocking notion to those of us who haven’t lived, until now, in an era where public officials engage in insurrection. But it was familiar to the people who enacted the 14th amendment,” he said.

“When you go through the issues one by one by one, the way lawyers are supposed to, his case looks terrible,” he added.

CNN legal analyst Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor, noted that Trump’s argument that he did not engage in insurrection is a “weak argument.”

“First on the facts but second, the Supreme Court’s not going to touch that,” he said. “They’re not a fact-finder, they don’t do trials. They generally won’t make that kind of finding.”

Honig said it is unclear how the court might look at Trump’s arguments that the matter should be left to Congress or that he was not given due process in the Colorado case.

“And then the fourth argument is this claim that the term ‘officers,’ as it’s used in the insurrection clause, doesn’t include the president. I tend to side with Colorado and [the plaintiffs] on that one. You can carve that up linguistically either way but just [on] common sense, how could it not apply to the president?” Honig questioned. “All of this is new… whatever happens here, we’re all going to learn together.”

Putin’s hypersonic bluster has been exposed by Ukraine’s American Patriots

The Telegraph – Opinion

Putin’s hypersonic bluster has been exposed by Ukraine’s American Patriots

David Axe – January 4, 2024

Russia’s biggest-ever air raids targeting Ukrainian cities have killed scores of Ukrainians, injured many others and traumatized potentially millions in a country that’s bracing for its third year of full-scale war.

But these same air raids were an important reminder that Russian superweapons aren’t always so super. At least, not compared to the best Western air-defenses – especially the American Patriot surface-to-air missile.

On December 29, Ukrainian air defences shot down 114 of 158 drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles the Russians launched at Ukrainian cities. During a second wave of attacks on January 2, the Ukrainians shot down 107 of 134 drones and missiles.

Most notably, Ukrainian missile batteries – Patriots, apparently – shot down 10 of 10 Kh-47M2 Kinzhal hypersonic missiles the Russians fired in the latter raid. Russian president Vladimir Putin once declared the air-launched, maneuverable Kinzhal to be “invincible.”

That was a lie. If anything, it’s one of the easier Russian munitions for the Ukrainians to defeat. And the failure of the Kinzhal has cast doubt over the whole class of hypersonic missiles – any munition that travels at least five times the speed of sound through the atmosphere while maneuvering. In 2018, Putin listed the Kinzhal as one of six Russian “super weapons”, unstoppable by any adversary. It’s clear that in at least one case, he was wrong.

Armies, navies and air forces all over the world are counting on speedy hypersonic missiles to give them a firepower advantage. But unless these pricey weapons perform better than the Kinzhal, their efforts might be misguided.

The 24-foot Kinzhal is an air-launched version of Russia’s first hypersonic missile, the ground-launched Iskander. The Russian air force launches the multi-million-dollar Kinzhals from a small force of specially-modified MiG-31 interceptors.

A Kinzhal ranges as far as 1,200 miles, which is more than a thousand miles farther than the best Ukrainian air-defenses can reach. That impressive range keeps the MiG-31 out of harm’s way, but it does nothing to protect the Kinzhal itself in the final minutes of its flight.

As a Kinzhal approaches within a hundred miles of its target – usually some Ukrainian city – it’s fair game for Ukraine’s Patriot PAC-2 and PAC-3 surface-to-air missiles. Ukrainian Patriots have been swatting down Kinzhals since at least May. But their greatest success came on January 2, when they shot down every Kinzhal in the sky.

Observers have scrutinized videos of the attacks to understand the Kinzhal’s disappointing performance. Disappointing to the Kremlin, that is.

A Ukrainian captured the final seconds of a Kinzhal’s flight on January 2 and helpfully uploaded the video to social media. Because we know how long a Kinzhal is, it’s a straightforward exercise to measure the missile’s speed as it plummeted to the ground. It seems the vaunted missile traveled no faster than Mach 1.9.

The implications are important. While a Kinzhal might speed along at Mach 5 or faster during the most efficient, high-altitude phase of its flight – right after launch – it slows down a lot as it descends and nears its target. As it gets lower and slower, it’s easy pickings for Patriot batteries.

And it’s going to get even easier for air defences to target Kinzhal and similar missiles. Each engagement is a learning opportunity, after all. “Every Ukrainian downing of Russian hypersonic Kh-47M2 Kinzhal with the Patriot missiles will improve the Patriot missile-intercept algorithm,” explained Jan Kallberg, a missile expert with the Center for European Policy Analysis.

A MiG-31 fighter jet of the Russian air force launches the Kinzhal hypersonic missile during a test. The Kinzhal has proven unable to defeat the American Patriot interceptor
A MiG-31 fighter jet of the Russian air force launches the Kinzhal hypersonic missile during a test. The Kinzhal has proven unable to defeat the American Patriot interceptor – Russian Defense Ministry Press Service

This not only improves Ukrainian Patriot batteries, it also benefits Patriots belonging to allied countries. “Data quality is high because it is live-tested,” Kallberg added. “It is not a desk job or theoretical calculation; this is data from a successful intercept.”

In that sense, every Patriot battery or missile reload that Ukraine’s allies donate to the war effort is an investment in their own defenses against hypersonic missiles – and not just Kinzhals. The more Kinzhals the Patriots shoot down over Ukraine, the better the American-made missiles get at intercepting all kinds of hypersonic missiles.

Even Chinese ones. Taiwan, take note.

It remains to be seen whether that argument will sway fickle Western politicians, however. Pro-Russia Republicans in the US Congress have, for months, refused to vote on $61 billion in fresh US military aid to Ukraine – aid that could pay for a lot of Patriot components and reloads.

Ukraine has just three full Patriot batteries, each of which has radars and several launchers. That’s enough to protect just three cities: presumably Kyiv, Kharkiv and Odesa. Ukraine needs additional Patriot batteries, and many more missiles to keep them in action during intensive drone and missile raids.

A consortium of Nato countries including Germany, The Netherlands, Romania and Spain recently signaled its intention to order, from US maker Raytheon, a fresh batch of 1,000 Patriot missiles. The nearly $6-billion order will support a new production line for the missiles in Germany.

It’s unclear whether Ukraine will benefit from this expanded production, however. If Nato is serious about defeating Russia, some of those missiles should go to Ukraine, where air-defenders are fighting a winning battle against Russia’s “invincible” hypersonic missiles.

Putin to grant citizenship to foreigners who sign 1-year contract with Russian army

Ukrayinska Pravda

Putin to grant citizenship to foreigners who sign 1-year contract with Russian army

Ukrainska Pravda – January 4, 2024

Vladimir Putin
Stock photo: Getty Images

Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a decree granting Russian citizenship to foreign nationals who signed a contract with the Russian Armed Forces during the war against Ukraine, as well as to their family members.

Details: Russian media and the document on the portal of legal acts

Quote from the decree: “To establish that the following may apply for Russian citizenship: foreign citizens who have signed a contract for military service in the Russian Armed Forces or in military formations during the period of the special military operation [as Russians call the war in Ukraine – ed.].”

Details: The contract must be concluded for a period of at least one year.

Family members of foreigners who have signed a contract with the Russian defence ministry will also be eligible for Russian citizenship. This includes spouses, children and parents.

The decree reportedly comes into force on the day of its publication.

The Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta (New Newspaper) pointed out that Putin already signed a similar decree in September 2022.

The difference between the decrees lies in the timeframe for reviewing the application. In the previous version, it was three months, while in the new version, it is only one.

Also, the old version of the document stated that the applicant must have served in the Ministry of Defence for at least six months. The new version does not contain this clause.

The publication writes that the new document cancels the previous one.

Background:

Russian media: Blackouts reported in Moscow following energy facility fire

The Kyiv Independent

Russian media: Blackouts reported in Moscow following energy facility fire

Martin Fornusek – January 4, 2024

A fire erupted in a substation in Russia’s capital on Jan. 4, causing electricity and heating outages in dozens of multi-story buildings amid freezing temperatures, Russian media reported.

The cause of the fire has not been reported. The incident took place only a few days after Russian attacks against Kyiv Oblast left 260,000 Ukrainian citizens temporarily without power.

The Russian Telegram news channel Mash reported that the fire erupted at a substation in northeastern Moscow at around 6 a.m. local time, causing outages in the municipal districts of Otradnoye, Bibirevo, as well as Northern and Southern Medvedkovo.

The temperature in the affected buildings had reportedly dropped to 10-15 degrees Celsius. According to Russian media, the night of Jan. 4 was the coldest in Moscow since the beginning of winter, with the temperatures dropping to minus 27.1 degrees.

At around 8:46, Mash reported that the fire had been extinguished and utility workers were working on site.

Most houses were switched to a backup circuit, the state-owned news agency RIA Novosti reported at around 9:10 a.m., adding that some 40 buildings will be connected within the next two hours.

US and allies continue discussions on transfer of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine — Kirby

The New Voice of Ukraine

US and allies continue discussions on transfer of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine — Kirby

The New Voice of Ukraine – January 4, 2024

The US continues discussions with its allies on the transfer of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine
The US continues discussions with its allies on the transfer of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine

The United States, along with its allies, is still in discussions regarding the transfer of frozen Russian assets to Ukraine, White House National Security Council Coordinator John Kirby said during a press briefing on Jan. 3.

While the focus is currently on supporting Kyiv in countering Russian aggression, the U.S. is still engaged in conversations “with our partners about what the post-war reconstruction and recovery in Ukraine should look like.

Read also: Air Force & men willing to die vs terrible leadership and morale – the White House on Russia’s army

“But obviously our main focus right now is to help them counter Russian aggression,” Kirby said.

The U.S., in collaboration with the EU, is exploring legal avenues to redirect $300 billion of Russian assets for the reconstruction and other needs of Ukraine, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Oct. 5.

Read also: ‘If you think the price is high now’ – Kirby outlines price U.S. will pay if Ukraine loses war

The Group of Seven (G7) is approaching the possibility of seizure of Russian assets for transfer to Ukraine, the Financial Times wrote on Dec. 16.

The United States, which had not previously publicly supported the idea of confiscation, told its G7 allies that it had found the funds to seize assets “in accordance with international law.”

“G7 members may take action to confiscate Russia’s sovereign assets as a retaliatory measure to end Russia’s aggression,” said the U.S. document, which was distributed to G7 committees.

Blinken and UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron held a telephone conversation to discuss support for Ukraine, the State Department reported on Jan. 2.

Ukraine will continue to resist Russia with the resources it has and does not have an alternative action plan while waiting for Western aid, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba told CNN on Jan. 3.